Abstract
This critical literature review examines how young children's right to refuse participation is conceptualized within early childhood education (ECE) research. Guided by childism, the review analyzes 26 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2025 to evaluate whether children's refusals are recognized as legitimate participation and how they are framed within curriculum, choice-making, play, and adult–child power relations. The analysis found that refusal-as-participation is largely absent across the literature: most studies made no mention of refusal or treated it as disengagement or misbehavior, while only a small subset explicitly recognized refusal as an expression of children's agency. Curriculum and choice contexts overwhelmingly positioned refusal as a problem to be resolved; play offered more space for refusals, but they remained inconsistently supported; and power dynamics often overshadowed or redirected refusals rather than acknowledging them. These findings reveal a persistent gap between theoretical commitments to participation rights and their enactment in ECE settings. Implications include the need for explicit conceptual recognition of refusal within participatory frameworks; structural conditions that enable children to decline participation without penalty; and rights-respecting pedagogies that honor refusal as an expression of children's dignity, boundaries, and humanity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
