Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Schooling today is steeped in a material-discursive community of achievement. Its ubiquity has become such that terms to qualify and quantify learning through achievement, for example high performing, average, below grade level, underachieving, lack of growth, and so on, and the technologies for identifying and treating the conditions of its construction have come to dominate the material and lived experiences of those in US schooling institutions. In this paper, I hope to tell the story of achievement as a productive material-discursive system that has been circulated as a scientific “truth” of nature and development and that has produced the subject of “the student” who is simultaneously the object of study and the site of administration and regulation of achievement theory-practice and technologies. The extensive body of work from critical psychologist and poststructural feminist researcher Valerie Walkerdine on developmental psychology, neoliberalism, and the humanist subject will guide my inquiry into the role that power/knowledge has played in the construction of “truths” about children that has produced, regulated, and repeated achievement in schools, and, consequently, theory-practices of teaching and learning. I will also consider how humanist and neoliberal discourses complicate and contribute to the overall apparatus of achievement. I will invite posthuman feminist questions that will serve as a path toward a (re)conceptualization of learning within and beyond achievement-structured confines.

Keywords

achievement poststructural feminist neoliberalism posthumanism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arribas-Ayllon

Walkerdine

(2017). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In: Willig C and Stainton-Rogers W (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, pp.110–123. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

(2007) High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher 36(5): 258–267.

(2013) Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in US education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 12(2): 7–20.

Baker

(1999) The dangerous and the good? Developmentalism, progress, and public schooling. American Educational Research Journal 36(4): 797–834.

Ball

(2004). Education for Sale! The Commodification of Everything? Annual Education Lecture. London, England: London Institute of Education.

Barad

(2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831.

Boldt

Leander

(2017) Becoming through ‘the break’: A post-human account of a child’s play. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 17(3): 409–425.

Bové

(1990) Discourse. In: Lentricchia

McLaughlin

(eds) Critical Terms for Literary Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.50–65.

Braidotti

(2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

10.

Butler

(1995) For a careful reading. In: Benhabib

Butler

Cornell

, et al. (eds) Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.127–143.

11.

Deleuze

(1994) Difference and Repetition. Patton

(trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Original work published 1968.

12.

Foucault

(1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York, NY: Vintage Books. Original work published 1975.

13.

Francis

Mills

(2012) Schools as damaging organisations: Instigating a dialogue concerning alternative models of schooling. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 20(2): 251–271.

14.

Franklin-Phipps

Rath

(2019). In Kuby

Spector

Thiel

(eds) Posthumanism and Literacy Education: Knowing/Becoming/Doing Literacies. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.142–155.

15.

Henriques

Hollway

Venn

, et al. (1984) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. New York, NY: Routledge.

16.

Jones

(2013) Literacies in the body. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56(7): 525–529.

17.

Kuby

(2017) Rhizomes and intra-activity with materials: Ways of disrupting and reimagining early literacy research, teaching, and learning. In: Iorio

Parnell

(eds) Meaning Making in Early Childhood Research. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.146–165.

18.

Kuhn

(2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (4th ed.). Chicago, IL; London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.

19.

Leander

Boldt

(2013) Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research 45(1): 22–46.

20.

Lenz Taguchi

(2010) Going Beyond the Theory/practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-Active Pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.

21.

Lenz Taguchi

(2014) New materialisms and play. In: Brooker L, Edwards S and Blaise M (eds) Sage Handbook of Play and Learning in Early Childhood. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, pp.79–90.

22.

McNeil

(2002) Contradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized Testing. New York, NY: Routledge.

23.

Murris

(2016) The Posthuman Child: Educational Transformation through Philosophy with Picturebooks. New York, NY: Routledge.

24.

Olsson

(2020) Lekta and literacy in early childhood education: Entwinements of idealism and materialism. In: Toohey

Smythe

Dagenais , et al. (eds) Transforming Language and Literacy Education: New Materialism, Posthumanism and Onto-Ethics. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.72–90.

25.

Osgood

Giugni

Scarlet

(2015) Putting posthumanist theory to work to reconfigure gender in early childhood: When theory becomes method becomes art. Global Studies of Childhood 5(3): 346–360.

26.

Schmeichel

Sharma

Pittard

(2017) Contours of neoliberalism in US empirical educational research. Curriculum Inquiry 47(2): 195–216.

27.

Sharma

(n.d.). Neoliberalism: An Introduction. Neoliberalism guide for educators. Retrieved August 7, 2023, from http://neolib.uga.edu/neoliberalism-introduction.php

28.

Sleeter

(2002) State curriculum standards and the shaping of student consciousness. Social Justice 29(4): 8–25.

29.

Spector

(2015) Meeting pedagogical encounters halfway. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 58(6): 447–450.

30.

Spivak

(1974). Translator’s preface. In: Spivak

(trans.) J. Derrida, Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp.ix–xc.

31.

St. Pierre

(2000) Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13(5): 477–515.

32.

St. Pierre

(2011) Refusing human being in humanist qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin

Giardina

(eds) Qualitative Inquiry and Global Crisis. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp.40–55.

33.

Thiel

(2015) Vibrant matter: The intra-active role of objects in the construction of young children’s literacies. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 64(1): 112–131.

34.

Thiel

Jones

(2017) The literacies of things: Reconfiguring the material-discursive production of race and class in an informal learning centre. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 17(3): 315–335.

35.

Venn

(1984) The subject of psychology. In: Willig C and Stainton-Rogers W (eds) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London, UK: Sage Publications, pp.119–152.

36.

Walkerdine

(1984) Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education. In: Willig C and Stainton-Rogers W (eds) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London, UK: Sage Publications, pp.153–202

37.

Walkerdine

(1988) The Mastery of Reason: Cognitive Development and the Production of Rationality. London, UK: Routledge.

38.

Walkerdine

(1993) Beyond developmentalism? Theory & Psychology 3(4): 451–469.

39.

Walkerdine

(1998) Counting Girls Out. London, UK; Bristol, PA: Routledge.

How does achievement exist? Putting achievement sous rature and inviting new questions about teaching and learning

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References