Play and Learning?: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Treatment of Play in Relation to Learning in Australian and New Zealand Early Childhood Curricula Frameworks
Free accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2020
Play and Learning?: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Treatment of Play in Relation to Learning in Australian and New Zealand Early Childhood Curricula Frameworks
The role of play in early childhood settings has become a global issue due to coordinated policy trends that privilege early learning, academic foci and formalised assessments amid a broader economic and investment agenda. This paper undertakes a critical discourse analysis of the Australian and New Zealand national early childhood curricula frameworks in order to examine the treatment of play and learning as they relate to one another. The analysis revealed that curriculum documents from both Australia and New Zealand drew on lifelong learning ideological frames to present a view of play as an activator of learning, where learning is interpreted as observable and recognisable academic processes. It was found that the agency attributed to the child in play and learning processes was central to how the role of the adult was interpreted, with implications for the play opportunities that children may encounter.
AdamsonE., & BrennanM. (2014). Social Investment or Private Profit? Diverging Notions of ‘Investment’ in Early Childhood Education and Care. International Journal of Early Childhood, 46(1), 47–61.
AlcockS. (2013). Searching for Play in Early Childhood Care and Education policy. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies; Heidelberg, 48(1), 19–33.
4.
AlexanderS. (2016). Questions Hanging over the Update of Te Wh?riki. Child Forum. https://www.childforum.com/.
BallS. J. (2003). The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
7.
BarblettL., KnausM., & Barratt-PughC. (2016). The Pushes and Pulls of Pedagogy in the Early Years: Competing knowledges and the erosion of play-based learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(4), 36–43.
8.
BradburyA. (2019). Datafied at Four: the role of data in the ‘schoolification’ of early childhood education in England. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 7–21.
9.
Brennan. (1998). The Politics of Australia Child Care: philanthropy to feminism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrennanD. (2014). The Business of Care: Australia's Experiment with the Marketisation of Childcare. In MillerC. & OrchardL. (Eds.), Australian public policy: Progressive ideas in the neoliberal ascendency (pp. 151–167). Public Policy.
11.
BrookeE., BlaiseM., & EdwardsS. (2014). Introduction. In BrookE., BlaiseM., & S. Edwards (Eds.), The sage Handbook of Play and Learning in Early Childhood (pp. 1–4). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
CampbellS. (2015). Feeling the Pressure: Early childhood educators’ reported views about learnign and teaching phonics in Australian prior-to-school settings. Australasian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38(1), 12–26.
14.
CarneyS. (2009). Negotiating Policy in an Age of Globalisation: Exploring Educational “Policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal, and China. Comparative Education Review, 53(1), 63–88.
15.
DaviesB., & BanselP. (2007). Neoliberalism and Education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751.
DuhnI. (2010). ‘The Centre is My Business’: Neo-Liberal Politics, Privatisation and Discourses of Professionalism in New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.49.
Early Childhood Council. (2017). Council Welcomes New Curriculum - with One Big Reservation. http://www.scoop.co.nz.
20.
EwingR. (2018). Exploding some of the Myths about Learning to Read: A review of research on the role of phonics. nsw Teachers Federation.
21.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
22.
FaircloughN. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed). Longman.
23.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Taylor & Francis [cam].
24.
FarquharS. (2008). Early Childhood Care and Education: From advocacy to institution. In CarpenterV. (Ed.), Nga kaupapa here: Connections and contradictions in education (pp. 46–56). Cengage Learning.
25.
FarquharS. (2015). New Zealand Early Childhood Curriculum: The politics of collaboration. Journal of Pedagogy, 6(2), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0013.
26.
FessehaE., & PyleA. (2016). Conceptualising Play-based Learning from Kindergarten teachers’ PerspectivesInternational Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1174105.
27.
GiardielloP., GeraldineL., & HargreavesA. (2019). Te Wh?riki. In McLeodN. & GiardielloP. (Eds.), Empowering Early Childhood Educators: International pedagogies as provocation (pp. 157–174). Routledge.
GrieshaberS., & RyanS. (2018). The Place of Learning in the Systematization and Standardization of Early Childhood Education. In HallG. E., QuinnL. F., & D. M. Gollnick (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning (1st edition, pp. 257-277). John Wiley & Sons.
30.
HunkinE. (2016). Deploying Foucauldian Genealogy: Critiquing ‘quality’ reform in early childhood policy in Australia. Power and Education, 8(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743815624114.
31.
HunkinE. (2018). Whose Quality? The (mis)uses of Quality Reform in Early Childhood and Education Policy. Journal of Education Policy, 33(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1352032.
32.
HunkinE. (2019). Being Seen and Being Changed: a story of ‘quality’ Early Childhood Education and the Global Education Reform Movement. In GasperM. & GibbsL. (Eds.), Thinking About Pedagogy in Early Education Series: Policy Intersecting Pedagogy. (Vol. 6, pp. 193-209). Routledge.
33.
JohnsonJ., E. (2014). Play Provisions and Pedagogy in Curricular Approaches. In BrookerE., BlaiseM., & S. Edwards (Eds.), The sage Handbook of Play and Learning in Early Childhood (pp. 180–191). Sage Publications.
34.
Leach-McGillD. (2018). The Impact of Policy on Early Childhood Education and Care Professionals Working in Integrated Service Settings. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia). http://hdl.handle.net/11343/214752.
LingardB. (2010). Policy Borrowing, Policy Learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.
37.
MaraD. (1998). Implementation of Te Wh?riki in Pacific Island Centers. Final Report to the Ministry of Education. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
38.
MayH. (2009). Politics in the Playground: The world of early childhood in New Zealand (Rev. ed., [2nd ed.]). Otago University Press.
39.
McGuinnP. (2016). From No Child Left behind to the Every Student Succeeds Act: Federalism and the Education Legacy of the Obama Administration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw014.
40.
MellorE. (1990). Stepping Stones: The development of early childhood services in Australia. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
41.
Ministry of Education. (2017). Te whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington Learning Media.
42.
MossP. (2014). Transformative Change and Real Utopias in Early Childhood Education: A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality. Routledge.
43.
MossP., DahlbergG., GrieshaberS., MantovaniS., MayH., PenceA., RaynaS., SwadenerB. B., & VandenbroeckM. (2016). The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development's International Early Learning Study: Opening for debate and contestation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949116661126.
44.
MundyK., GreenA., LingardB., & VergerA. (2016). Handbook of Global Education Policy. Wiley Blackwell.
45.
NeaumS. (2016). School Readiness and Pedagogies of Competence and Performance: Theorising the troubled relationship between early years and early years policy, International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1205970.
46.
NuttallJ. (2018). Engaging with Ambivalence: The Neglect of Early Childhood Teacher Education in Initial Teacher Education Reform in Australia. In Wyatt-SmithC. & AdieL. (Eds.), Innovation and Accountability in Teacher Education: Setting Directions for New Cultures in Teacher Education (pp. 155–169). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2_10.
47.
OECD. (2004). Starting Strong: Curricula and pedagogies in early childhood education and care - five curriculum outlines. oecd.
48.
OECD. (2006). Starting Strong ii: Early Childhood Education and Care. oecd.
49.
OECD. (2019). The International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study - The study.http://www.oecd.org/.
50.
OrtlippM., ArthurL., & WoodrowC. (2011). Discourses of the Early Years Learning Framework: constructing the early childhood professional. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(1), 56–70.
51.
OsgoodJ. (2006). Deconstructing Professionalism in Early Childhood Education: Resisting the Regulatory Gaze. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2006.7.1.5.
52.
RataE. (2008). The Politics of Educational Equality. In CarpenterV., JessonJ., RobertsP., & M. Stephenson (Eds.), Ng? kaupapa here: Connections and contradictions in education (pp. 36–46). Cengage.
53.
Learning.Roberts-HolmesG. (2014). The ‘Datafication’ of Early Years Pedagogy: ‘if the teaching is good, the data should be good and if there's bad teaching, there is bad data’. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 302–315.
54.
SamulessonI. P., & PramlingN. (2014). Children's Play and Learning and Developmental Pedagogy. In BrookerE., BlaiseM. & EdwardsS. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Play and Learning in Early Childhood (pp. 169–179). Sage Publications.
SmithK., TesarM., & MyersC. Y. (2016). Edu-capitalism and the Governing of Early Childhood Education and Care in Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610615625165.
57.
StoverS. (2016). The Educationalising of Early Childhood in Aotearoa New Zealand: Tracking “free play” 1940s-2010. Paedagogica Historica, 52(5), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2016.1170709.
58.
Sutton-SmithB. (2001). The Ambiguity of Play. Harvard University Press.
59.
UrbanM. (2015). From ‘Closing the Gap’ to an Ethics of Affirmation: Reconceptualising the Role of Early Childhood Services in Times of Uncertainty. European Journal of Education, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12131.
60.
WasmuthH., & NiteckiE. (2017). Global Early Childhood Policies: The impact of the global education reform movement and possibilities for reconceptualization. Global Education Review, 4(2), 1–17.
61.
WestbrookF. (2018). Shifting Tectonic Plates of Key Discourses in New Zealand Early Childhood Education Policy (1989-2017): A critical discourse analysis at the dawn of change (Masters thesis, The University of Waikato). https://hdl.handle.net/10289/12079.
62.
WoodE. (2014). The Play-Pedagogy Interface in Contemporary Debates. In BrookerE., BlaiseM. & EdwardsS. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Play and Learning in Early Childhood (pp. 145–156). Sage Publications.
63.
WoodrowC., & PressF. (2007). (Re)Positioning the Child in the Policy/Politics of Early Childhood. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00328.x.
