This article builds on recent retheorizations of politics as increasingly rearticulated through resistant projects, rejection of the political commons, and fissures that reveal new forms of political worldmaking in the 21st century. Moving between ethnography of online and offline supporters of the French far-right, the article demonstrates how French partisans of the RN and allied far-right movements, perhaps increasingly, are rendering themselves in/visible: That is, there is reluctance to disclose support of the French far-right in face-to-face and public spaces, while political self-disclosure and “openness” flourishes in the anonymity that online spaces provide. But rather than understanding this as straightforward case of extremism-gone-online, I argue that there are important dialogical articulations, and imbrications, between (anonymous) online and (face-to-face) offline political participation that raise questions about correlations among publicness, visibility, citizenship, and democracy. The article reviews critiques of the public sphere while arguing for its cultural embeddedness in especially French understandings of politics and especially a particular “democratic doxa” implying panoptical visibility. It moves to complicate these conceptions of publicness with ethnographic evidence from a far-right chat room in which anonymous participants claim to constitute a more authentic French public, juxtaposing face-to-face ethnography of a far-right town in southern France. In so doing, the article identifies the ways in which offline and online politics in today’s France seem to converge, rather than diverge, challenging scholars to contemplate whether visibility remains central to democratic and electoral processes, or whether we must better account for in/visible political world-making in today’s France and beyond.
AbélèsM (1989) Jours Tranquilles en 89: Ethnologie Politique d'un Département Français. Paris: Odile Jacob.
2.
AciksozSC (2024) Ethnographic betrayals: Secrecy, loyalty, and sovereignty in the field.Current Anthropology65(S26): S1–S195.
3.
AndersonBR (2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Rev. ed. New York: Verso.
4.
ArendtH (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
ArendtH (1963) On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.
6.
ArendtH (1969) On Violence. New York: Harvest Books.
7.
AsadTFernandezJWHerzfeldM, et al. (1997) Provocations of European ethnology.American Anthropologist99(4): 713–730.
8.
AsheSDBusherJMacklinGWinterA (eds) (2020) Researching the Far Right: Theory, Method and Practice. New York: Routledge.
9.
BanksAJHicksHM (2016) Fear and implicit racism: Whites’ support for voter ID laws.Political Psychology37(5): 641–658.
10.
BarnesR (2018) Uncovering Online Commenting Culture: Trolls, Fanboys and Lurkers. New York: Springer.
11.
BenhabibS (1996) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BlaserMde la CadenaM (2017) The uncommons: An introduction.Anthropologica59(2): 185–193.
13.
BlauA (2021) Defending instrumental rationality against critical theorists. Political Research Quarterly74(4): 1067–1080.
14.
BleeKM (2007) Ethnographies of the far right.Journal of Contemporary Ethnography36(2): 119–128.
15.
BoellstorffT (2008) Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. (trans. by Nice R). Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
17.
BowenJR (2007) Why the French Don't Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
BowenJR (2010) Can Islam be French? Pluralism and Pragmatism in a Secularist State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
BowieK (2008) Standing in the shadows: Of matrilocality and the role of women in a village election in northern Thailand.American Ethnologist35(1): 136–153.
20.
ChakrabartyD (2008) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
ChakravarttyPRoyS (2017) Mediatized populisms| Mediatized populisms: Inter-Asian Lineages—Introduction. International Journal of Communication11: 20.
22.
ColemanS (2013) How Voters Feel. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
CurlewAE (2019) Undisciplined performativity: A sociological approach to anonymity. Social Media + Society5(1): 1–15.
24.
DeVoreJ (2022) Between shame and a shared world: Toward a democratized theory of heterodoxical awareness.Anthropological Theory22(1): 52–77.
25.
DossaS (1989) The Public Realm and the Public Self: The Political Theory of Hannah Arendt. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
26.
FeldmanG (2022) Sovereignty as new beginnings: Action beyond the liberal subject, among undercover police investigators in Europe, for example.Anthropological Theory22(3): 317–337.
27.
FernandoML (2014) The Republic Unsettled: Muslim French and the Contradictions of Secularism. Durham: Duke University Press.
28.
FishAMurilloLNguyenL, et al. (2011) Birds of the Internet: Towards a field guide to the organization and governance of participation. Journal of Cultural Economy4(2): 157–187.
29.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (trans. Sheridan A). New York: Vintage Books.
30.
FraserN (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.Social Text25/26: 56–80.
31.
GarrigouA (2017) L'idolâtrie électorale. In: L'OBS (Dossiers du Nouvel Observateur). Paris: Groupe Le Monde, 58–61.
GiolC (2017) Les réseaux de la colère. In: Dossiers du Nouvel Observateur. Paris: Groupe Le Monde, 22–24.
34.
HabermasJ (1994) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans. Burger T and Lawrence F). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
HenningerN (2019) ‘I gave someone a good death’: Anonymity in a community of Reddit's medical professionals.Convergence 26(7): 1673–1689.
36.
HirschkindCde AbreuMJACaduffC (2017) New media, new publics? An introduction to supplement 15.Current Anthropology58(S15): S3–S12.
37.
HolmesDR (2000) Integral Europe: Fast-capitalism, Multiculturalism, Neofascism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
HolmesDR (2019) Fascism at eye level: The anthropological conundrum.Focaal84: 62–90.
39.
HolstonJCaldeiraTPR (1998) Democracy, law, and violence: Disjunctions of Brazilian citizenship. Comparative Studies in Society and History40(4): 691–729.
40.
IgounetVJarousseauV (2017) L’Illusion Nationale. Deux Ans d’Enquête dans les Villes FN. Paris: Les Arènes.
41.
JungeB (2020) ‘Our Brazil has become a mess’: Nostalgic narratives of disorder and disinterest as a ‘once-rising poor family from Recife, Brazil, anticipates the 2018 elections.The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology24(4): 914–931.
42.
KaiserJ (2021) Localized hatred: The importance of physical spaces within the German far-right online counterpublic on Facebook. In: UdupaSGagliardoneIHervikP (eds) Digital Hate: The Global Conjuncture of Extreme Speech. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 211–225.
43.
KalbD (2009) Conversations with a Polish populist: Tracing hidden histories of globalization, class, and dispossession in postsocialism (and beyond).American Ethnologist36(2): 207–223.
44.
KeltyC (2005) Geeks, social imaginaries, and recursive publics.Cultural Anthropology20(2): 185–214.
45.
KlugeANegtO (2016) Public Sphere and Experience: Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. New York: Verso Books.
46.
KochI (2017) When politicians fail: Zombie democracy and the anthropology of actually existing politics.The Sociological Review65(1): 105–120.
47.
KoelbleTALipumaE (2008) Democratizing democracy: A postcolonial critique of conventional approaches to the ‘measurement of democracy.’. Democratisation15(1): 1–28.
MahmudL (2014) The Brotherhood of Freemason Sisters: Gender, Secrecy, and Fraternity in Italian Masonic Lodges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
MazzarellaW (2019) The anthropology of populism: Beyond the liberal settlement.Annual Review of Anthropology48: 45–60.
51.
Miller-IdrissC (2009) Blood and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
52.
Miller-IdrissC (2017) The Extreme Gone Mainstream: Commercialization and Far Right Youth Culture in Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
53.
Miller-IdrissC (2020) Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54.
MouffeC (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?Social Research66(3): 745–758.
55.
Noelle-NeumannE (1984) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
PaiH-H (2016) Angry White People: Coming Face-to-Face with the British Far Right. London: Zed Books.
57.
PapiS (2012) Islam, laïcité et commensalité dans les cantines scolaires publiques. Ou comment continuer à manger ensemble “à la table de la République.Hommes & Migrations1296: 126–135.
58.
PasiekaA (2016) Reenacting ethnic cleansing: People's history and elitist nationalism in contemporary Poland. Nation and Nationalism22(1): 63–83.
59.
PasiekaA (2019) Anthropology of the far right: What if we like the ‘unlikeable’ others?Anthropology Today1(35): 3–6.
60.
PearceC and Artemesia (2011) Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
PerrinoS (2015) Performing extracomunitari: Mocking migrants in Veneto Barzellette.Language in Society44(2): 141–160.
62.
PerrinoS (2017) Recontextualizing racialized stories on YouTube.Narrative Inquiry27(2): 261–285.
63.
PosteroNElinoffE (2019) Introduction: A return to politics.Anthropological Theory19: 3–28.
64.
PrzybylskiL (2020) Hybrid Ethnography: Online, Offline, and In Between. New York: Sage.
65.
RabinowP (1989) French Modern: Norms and Forms of the Social Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
RileyEJ (2019) The politics of terànga: Gender, hospitality, and power in Senegal.PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review42(1): 110–124.
67.
RiordanMA (2017) Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect in text messages.Journal of Language and Social Psychology36(5): 549–567.
68.
RosanvallonPArmanetF (2017) Vers une démocatie post-électorale. In: Dossiers du Nouvel Observateur. Paris: Groupe Le Monde, 90–93.
69.
ShoshanN (2016) The Management of Hate: Nation, Affect, and the Governance of Right-Wing Extremism in Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
70.
SiinoCSoussiSA (2017) Zones grises du travail au Nord et au Sud: dynamique de globalisation ou logiques locales?Revue Interventions économiques, Papers in Political Economy58: 1–16.
71.
SilversteinPA (2004) Algeria in France: Transpolitics, Race, and Nation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
72.
SilversteinPA (2005) Immigrant racialization and the new savage slot: Race, migration, and immigration in the new Europe.Annu. Rev. Anthropol34: 363–384.
73.
SzombatiK (2018) The Revolt of the Provinces: Anti-gypsism and Right-Wing Politics in Hungary. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
74.
ThorleifssonC (2017) Disposable strangers: Far-right securitisation of forced migration in Hungary.Social Anthropology25(3): 318–334.
75.
UdupaS (2018) Enterprise Hindutva and social media in urban India.Contemporary South Asia26(4): 453–467.
76.
Urquizu-SanchoI (2006) The non-declared vote in the surveys: The Spanish case in the 1980s.Electoral Studies25(1): 103–128.
77.
van der MeerTWGvan DethJWScheepersPLH (2009) The politicized participant: Ideology and political action in 20 democracies.Comparative Political Studies42(11): 1426–1457.
78.
VincentS (2018) The rise and irrelevance of the state: Political views from a peasant community of the 2016 Peruvian presidential election.PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review41(2): 247–261.
79.
WarnerM (2002) Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture14(1): 49–90.
80.
WoganP (2001) Imagined communities reconsidered: Is print-capitalism what we think it is?Anthropological Theory1(4): 403–418.
81.
WoolleyDR (2016) PLATO: The emergence of on-line community. In: MalloyJ (ed) Social Media Archeology and Poetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 103–120.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
