The concept of bricolage was formulated by Lévi-Strauss in The Savage Mind to provide an analogy for how mythical thought works. In the following decades, scholars have frequently deployed the concept, not only in anthropology, but also in sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Inheriting Lévi-Strauss's structuralism, French-speaking scholarship has tended to emphasize the structural patterns or constraints of bricolage, while English-speaking scholars have shown more interest in the individuality, subjectivity, or contingency of bricolage. This article seeks to integrate the merits of both strands of scholarships, transcend the collectivist/individualistic divisions, and develop bricolage into a multidimensional concept: Bricolage is a generative principle of regulated improvisation responding to restrictive or limited conditions. My ethnographic study of Kitchen God worship in one region of China shows that the entire process of creating bricolage is an individual embodiment of collective structure. Although bricolage is a product of structure intended to reproduce the structure, it can occasionally affect or change the structure. Thus, it is an important micro mechanism for culture change.
AllainMMadariagaA (2020) Understanding policy change through bricolage: the case of Chile’s renewable energy policy. Governance33(3): 675–692.
2.
AltglasV (2014) From Yoga to Kabbalah: Religious Exoticism and the Logics of Bricolage. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AmitaK (2023) From anthropology to artistic practice: how bricolage has been used in the twentieth century as an ideal model of engagement with the world. Journal of Human Values29(1): 48–57.
4.
BakerTMinerSEesleyT (2003) Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving, and improvisational competency in the founding process. Research Policy32(2): 255–276.
5.
BakerTNelsonR (2005) Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 329–366.
6.
BastideR (1970) Mémoire collective et sociologie du bricolage. L’Année Sociologique21(3): 65–108.
7.
BentzenJ (2013) Origins of religiousness: the role of natural disasters. Discussion Paper No. 13-02, Copenhagen: Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2221859
8.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BourdieuP (1992) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
10.
BredonJMitrophanowI (1966) The Moon Year: A Record of Chinese Customs and Festivals. New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp.
11.
CampicheR (2003) L’individualisation constitue-t-elle encore le paradigme de la religion en modernité tardive?Social Compass50(3): 297–309.
12.
ChaoE (1999) The Maoist shaman and the madman: ritual bricolage, failed ritual, and failed ritual theory. Cultural Anthropology14(4): 505–534.
13.
CiborraC (1996) Teams, Markets and Systems: Business Innovation and Information Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
De CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California.
15.
De CerteauM (1987) La Faiblesse de Croire. Paris: Édition du Seuil.
16.
DikötterF (2010) Mao’s Great Famine-The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962. New York: Walker & Co.
17.
DomenicoDHaughHTraceyP (2010) Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(4): 681–703.
18.
DubouleDWilkinsS (1998) The evolution of bricolage. Trends in Genetics14(2): 54–59.
19.
GarudRKarnøeP (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy32: 277–300.
20.
GoossaertVPalmerD (2011) The Religious Question in Modern China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
HaoT (2003) The Kitchen God, the Earth God, and the City God: A Study on Chinese Folk Deities. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.
22.
HassenforderEBaroneS (2019) Institutional arrangements for water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development35(5): 783–807.
23.
HullH (1991) Networks & bricolage: a prolegomenon to a history of twentieth-century American Academi Jurisprudence. The American Journal of Legal History35(3): 307–322.
24.
HungC (2010) The anti-unity sect campaign and mass mobilization in the early People’s Republic of China. The China Quarterly202: 400–420.
LiuZ (2020) State-building encounters popular religion: Pingxiang, 1912–1978. PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
34.
LizardoO (2004) The cognitive origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour34(4): 375–401.
SchoenhalsM (1996) China’s Cultural Revolution, 1966–1969: Not a Dinner Party. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
42.
ShalleyEHittAZhouJ (2015) Introduction: psychological bricolage: integrating social identities to produce creative solutions. In: ShalleyEHittAZhouJ (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. New York: Oxford University Press.
SmithS (2006) Talking toads and chinless ghosts: the politics of “superstitious” rumors in the People’s Republic of China, 1961-1965. The American Historical Review111(2): 405–427.
The Jiefang Daily (1964) Changyi guoyige geminghuade chunjie. The Jiefang Daily, 1 February.
47.
The Ministry of Culture Party Committee, Wenhuabu dangzu (1997) Wenhuabu dangzu guanyu tingyan ‘guixi’ de qingshi baogao. In: The Literature Research Office of the Chinese Communist Party Central Political Bureau (ed) Jianguo yilai zhongyao wenxian xuanbian. Beijing: Zhongyang Wenxian Press, pp.248–251.
WeickE (1998) Introductory essay: improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science9(5): 543–555.
50.
WilderMHowlettM (2014) The politics of policy anomalies: bricolage and the hermeneutics of paradigms. Critical Policy Studies8(1): 183–202.
51.
YangM (2015) Shamanism and spirit possession in Chinese modernity: some preliminary reflections on a gendered religiosity of the body. Review of Religion and Chinese Society2: 51–86.
