This paper develops an interdisciplinary perspective that connects free improvisation with cultural psychology. Free improvisation is positioned as a central element of the creative process, defined by spontaneity and generative potential. To improvise is to create the new in real time, generating alternative interpretations and opening pathways to novel possibilities. Observing an improviser reveals how new ideas emerge through embodied, expressive action. This practice engages meaning-making processes in the present moment, fosters interpersonal connection, and suggests directions for future action. By integrating musical practices with cultural theories of human development and creativity, the paper seeks to offer a renewed understanding of improvisation as both an artistic and psychological phenomenon. The discussion contributes to a growing field of research that conceptualizes creativity as a social, situated, and embodied process, shaped by cultural tools and social interaction. Furthermore, it encourages a conceptual shift away from static, individualistic models of creativity toward a more dynamic, relational, and process-oriented perspective. Musical improvisation is presented as a vivid expression of human creativity, reflecting the complexities of everyday social interactions and artistic expression.
BaileyD. (1992). Improvisation: Is nature and practice in music. The British Library National Sound Archive.
3.
BakhtinM. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
4.
BakhtinM. (1999). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BakhtinM. (2008). Dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (HolquistM., edit. C. Emerson & M. Holquist, translated). University of Texas Press.
6.
BjerstedtS. (2014). Storytelling in jazz improvisation: Implications of a rich intermedial metaphor. [s.l.]. [Doctoral dissertation]. Lund University.
BoeschE. E. (2007). Culture–individual–culture: The cycle of knowledge. In LonnerW. J.HayesS. A. (Eds.), Discovering cultural psychology: A profile and selected readings of Ernest E. Boesch (pp. 201–212). Information Age Publishing. ISBN: 9781607526070, 1607526077.
9.
BrancoA. U. (2016). Values and their ways of guiding the psyche. In ValsinerJ.MarsicoG.ChaudharyN.SatoT.DazzaniV. (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being: The Yokohama manifesto (pp. 225–244). Springer.
10.
BrancoA. U. (2021). Hypergeneralized affective-semiotic fields: The generative power of a construct. In WagonerB.ChristensenB. A.DemuthC. (Eds.), Culture as process: A tribute to Jaan Valsiner (pp. 143–152). Springer.
11.
BrancoA. U. (2023). Creativity, self-development and human values: A dialogical perspective on promoting a democratic world. In Neves-PereiraM. S.PinheiroM. A. (Eds.), A dialogical approach to creativity (pp. 109–133). Palgrave Editors.
12.
BrancoA. U.ValsinerJ. (1997). Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychology & Developing Societies, 9(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133369700900103
13.
CallinghamA. E. (2007). Spontaneous music: The first generation British free improvisers. (PhD thesis. University of Sheffield. The University ofHuddersfield). https://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/4659/
14.
CanonneC. (2016). Du concept d’improvisation à la pratique de l’improvisation libre. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 47(1), 17–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43869452
15.
CiacchiM. (2019). Improvisação livre e forma: Processo criativo entre estímulos e efeitos. [Doctoral dissertation]. Universidade Federal da Paraíba.
16.
CorbinA. (1998). Village bells: Sound and meaning in the 19th-century French countryside. New York: Columbia Press.
17.
CostaR. (2003). O músico enquanto meio e os territórios da livre improvisação. [Doctoral dissertation]. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP).
GaskellG. (2003). Entrevistas individuais e grupais. In BauerM. W.GaskellG. (Orgs.), Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som. Um manual prático. (pp. 64–89). Vozes.
23.
GlăveanuV. P. (2010a). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007
GlăveanuV. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528
26.
GlăveanuV. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Springer.
27.
GlăveanuV. P. (2015a). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.94
28.
GlăveanuV. P. (2017). The creative self in dialogue. In KarwowskiM.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The creative self. Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 117–135). Academic Press–Elsevier.
29.
GlăveanuV. P. (2021). The possible: A sociocultural theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 2021.LCCN 2020027041.
30.
GlăveanuV. P. (2015b). Unpacking the triad of creativity, culture, and development: An exercise in relational thinking. In Ai-Girl tan Christoph Perleth. Creativity, culture, and development (pp. 13–28). Springer Science Business Media Singapore.
31.
GuidoM. (2017). Studies in historical improvisation from cantare super librum to partimenti. Routledge.
32.
Lopes de OliveiraM. C. S. (2023). Como os seres humanos se desenvolvem? A perspectiva da Psicologia Cultural. In Neves-PereiraM. S.BrancoA. (Eds.), A psicologia cultural chega à escola. Desenvolvimento humano, cultura e educação (pp. 35–64). IAP - Information Age Publishing.
MonzoD. S. V. (2022). Improvisação livre distribuída: um estudo das dinâmicas interativas no processo criativo à luz das abordagens culturais da criatividade. Doctoral dissertation. Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Repositório da Unirio. https://www.repositorio-bc.unirio.br:8080/xmlui/handle/unirio/13648?show=full
40.
NeemanE. (2014). Free improvisation as a performance technique: Group creativity and interpreting graphic scores. [Doctoral dissertation]. Juliard School.
41.
NessI. J.DystheO. (2020). Polyphonic imagination: Understanding idea generation in multidisciplinary groups as a multivoiced stimulation of fantasy. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712163
42.
NettlB. (2001). Improvisation. Grove Music Online.
43.
Neves-PereiraM. S.BrancoA. U. (2015). Criatividade na educação infantil: contribuições da psicologia cultural para a investigação de concepções e práticas de educadores. Estudos de Psicologia, 20(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20150018
Neves-PereiraM. S.PinheiroM. A. (2023). Creativity and dialogism. In Neves- PereiraM. S.PinheiroM. A. (Eds.), A dialogical approach to creativity (pp. 11–32). Palgrave Editors.
46.
NgC. H. (Ed.). (2018). Free improvisation as living expression. Contextualized practices in arts education: An international dialogue on Singapore (pp. 77–99). National Association for Music Education. Reprints and permissions: /journalsPermissions.nav.
