Holbraad and Pedersen have revisited the ontological turn, suggesting that it is strictly concerned with methodology only. Holbraad goes even further, accepting an aesthetic criterion for ethnography only. This is a sign of theoretical decline. In my paper, I claim that ontologists’ tendency to overestimate the significance of ethnographic experience causes theoretical confusion. I claim that neo-pragmatic analysis can eliminate this confusion. I also argue that there is only one remaining issue from the ontological turn that is not entirely lost. A careful evaluation of all folk categories, with all its possible consequences, can boost the robustness of all competitive theories, Cognitive Evolutionary Science included.
ApterA (2017) Ethnographic X-files and Holbraad’s double-bind: Reflections on an ontological turn of events. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory7(1): 287–302.
2.
ArdenerE (1982) Social anthropology, language, and reality. In: ParkinDJ (eds) Semantic Anthropology. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–14.
3.
AtranS (2002) In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BenaduciMLutriASturmC (2016) Composing a common world? Reflections around the ontological turn in anthropology. Anuac5(2): 79–98.
5.
BessireLBondD (2014) Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist41(3): 440–456.
6.
BoghossianP (2007) Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
BoyerP (2001) Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.
8.
BoyerP (2018) Minds Make Societies. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
9.
BoyerPBarrettHC (2015) Intuitive ontologies and domain specificity. In: BussDM (eds) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley, pp. 161–180. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
10.
BrandomRB (1994) Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA, London, England: Harvard University Press.
11.
BrozL (2018) Ghost and the other : Towards strict ontological continuity of uncanny encounters in siberia and academia. Terrain. Anthropologie & sciences humaines69: 1–21.
ChagnonN (2013) Noble Savages. New York: Simon & Schuster.
14.
ChudekMMcNamaraRABirchS, et al. (2018) Do minds switch bodies? Dualist interpretations across ages and societies. Religion, Brain and Behavior8(4): 354–368.
15.
CliffordJMarcusGE (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
CostaLFaustoC (2010) The return of the animists: Recent studies of amazonian ontologies. Religion and Society1(1): 89–109.
DescolaP (2013) Beyond Nature and Culture?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
DescolaPPálssonG (1996) Nature and Society. London: Routledge.
20.
DriscollC (2017) The evolutionary culture concepts. Philosophy of Science84(1): 35–55.
21.
DriscollC (2018) Cultural evolution and the social sciences: A case of unification?Biology & Philosophy33(1–2): 7.
22.
DurhamWH (1991) Coevolution : Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
ErazoJJarrettC (2018) Managing alterity from within: The ontological turn in anthropology and indigenous efforts to shape shamanism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute24(1): 145–163.
24.
Evans-PritchardEE (1976) Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (1937). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
GallagherS (2017) Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
GallagherSAllenM (2018) Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese195(6): 2627–2648.
27.
GellnerE (1992) Reason and Culture. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
28.
GraeberD (2015) Radical alterity is just another way of saying ‘reality’: A reply to eduardo viveiros de castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory5(2): 1–41.
29.
HenareAHolbraadMWastellS (2007) Thinking Through Things: Theorizing Artifacts Ethnographically. London: Routledge.
30.
HenrichJ (2015) The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HeywoodP (2020) “All the difference in the world”: The nature of difference and different natures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences50(6): 543–564.
33.
HolbraadM (2012) Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
34.
HolbraadM (2013) Turning a corner: Preamble for ‘The relative native’ by eduardo viveiros de castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory3(3): 469–471.
35.
HolbraadM (2020) The shapes of relations: Anthropology as conceptual morphology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences50(6): 495–522.
36.
HolbraadMPedersenMA (2017) The Ontological Turn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HolbraadMCarrithersMCandeaM, et al. (2010) Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 meeting of the group for debates in anthropological theory, university of manchester. Critique of Anthropology30(2): 152–200.
38.
HorowitzDL (2001) The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
39.
Hollis Mand LukesS (eds) (1982) Rationality and Relativism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
JarvieI (2018) Rationality and irrationality revisited or intellectualism vindicated or How stands the problem of the rationality of magic? In: BronnerGDi IornoF (eds) The Mystery of Rationality. Mind, Beliefs and the Social Sciences. Cham: Springer, pp. 115–129.
41.
KapfererB (2011) Legends of People, Myths of State: Violence, Intolerance, and Political Culture in Sri Lanka and Australia. London: Berghahn Books.
42.
KellyJD (2014) The ontological turn: Where are we?HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4(1): 4.
43.
KirkseySEHelmreichS (2010) The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology25(4): 545–576.
44.
KitayamaSUskulAK (2010) Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology62(1): 419–449.
45.
KohnE (2007) How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. American Ethnologist34(1): 3–24.
46.
KohnE (2014) Toward an ethical practice in the anthropocene. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4: 459–464.
47.
KohnE (2015) Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology44(1): 311–327.
48.
KundtR (2015) Contemporary Evolutionary Theories of Culture and the Study of Religion. London: Bloomsbury.
LatourB (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
LatourB (2013) An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
LatourB (2017) Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. London: Wiley.
58.
LawJHassardJ (1999) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Wiley.
59.
LewensT (2015) Cultural Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60.
LewensT (2017) Human nature, human culture : The case of cultural evolution. Interface Focus7(5): 20170018.
61.
Londoño SulkinCD (2005) Inhuman beings: Morality and perspectivism among Muinane people (Colombian Amazon). Ethnos70(1): 7–30.
62.
LukesS (2007) The problem of apparently irratioinal beliefs. In: TurnerSPRisjordMW (eds) Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 591–606.
63.
McCauleyRN (2013) Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
McCauleyRNCohenE (2010) Cognitive science and the naturalness of religion. Philosophy Compass5(9): 779–792.
65.
McCauleyRNLawsonET (1999) Bringing Ritual to Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
MacCormackCPStrathernM (1980) Nature, Culture, and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
McDonaldM (2017) The ontological turn meets the certainty of death. Anthropology and Medicine24(2): 205–220.
68.
MedinDRossNCoxD, et al. (2007) Why folkbiology matters: Resource conflict despite shared goals and knowledge. Human Ecology35(3): 315–329.
69.
MenaryR (2006) Radical Enactivism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
70.
MercierHSperberD (2017) The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
MesoudiA (2011) Cultural Evolution : How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
MesoudiA (2016a) Cultural evolution: A review of theory, findings and controversies. Evolutionary Biology43: 4.
73.
MesoudiA (2016b) Cultural evolution: Integrating psychology, evolution and culture. Current Opinion in Psychology7: 17–22.
74.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
75.
NeedhamR (1972) Belief, Language, and Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
76.
OjalehtoBLMedinDL (2015) Perspectives on culture and concepts. Annual Review of Psychology66(1): 249–275.
77.
PalecekM (2020) The evolution of ‘culture’: Juggling a concept. Anthropological Theory20(1): 53–76.
78.
PalecekMRisjordM (2013) Relativism and the ontological turn within anthropology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences43(1): 3–23.
79.
PaxsonHHelmreichS (2014) The perils and promises of microbial abundance: Novel natures and model ecosystems, from artisanal cheese to alien seas. Social Studies of Science44(2): 165–193.
80.
PedersenMA (2011) Not Quite Shamans. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
81.
PeregrinJ (2010) Language, the world and the nature of philosophy. In: AuxierREHahnLE (eds) The Philosophy of Richard Rorty. La Salle, Ill: Open Court, pp. 225–245.
82.
PickeringA (2017) The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis61(2): 134–150. DOI: 10.3167/sa.2017.610209.
83.
PinkerS (2003) The Blank Slate. London: Penguin Publishing Group.
84.
PotochnikA (2015) The diverse aims of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A53: 71–80.
85.
PotochnikA (2017) Idealization and the Aims of Science. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
86.
RichersonPJBoydR (2006) Not by Genes Alone. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
87.
RisjordM (2000) Woodcutters & Witchcraft: Rationality and Interpretive Change in the Social Sciences. New York: SUNY.
88.
RisjordM (2004) The limits of cognitive theory in anthropology. Philosophical Explorations7(3): 281–297.
89.
RisjordM (2020) Anthropology without belief: An anti-representationalist ontological turn. Philosophy of the Social Sciences50(6): 586–609.
90.
RortyR (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
91.
RortyR (1991) Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92.
RothP (1989) Ethnography without tears. Current Anthropology30(5): 555–569.
93.
Scott-PhillipsTC (2017) A (simple) experimental demonstration that cultural evolution is not replicative, but reconstructive — and an explanation of Why this difference matters. Journal of Cognition and Culture17(17): 1–11.
94.
SeveriC (2014) Transmutating beings. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4(2): 41–71.
95.
SidkyH (2018) The War on Science, Anti-Intellectualism, and ‘Alternative Ways of Knowing’ in 21st-Century America. The Skeptical Inquirer, 42(2): 38–43.
96.
SlingerlandECollardM (2011) Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97.
SperberD (1996) Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Wiley.
98.
StrathernM (2014a) Anthropological reasoning: Some threads of thought. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory4(3): 23–37. DOI: 10.14318/hau4.3.003.
99.
StrathernM (2014b) Reading relations backwards. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute20(1): 3–19. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12076.
TaylorCC (1999) A gendered genocide: Tutsi women and hutu extremists in the 1994 Rwanda genocide. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review22(1): 42–54. DOI: 10.1525/pol.1999.22.1.42.
102.
ToobyJCosmidesL (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: BarkowJHCosmidesLToobyJ (eds) The Adapted Mind : Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–136. DOI: 10.4324/9781410608994.
103.
TsingA (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
104.
TurnerSP (2018) Cognitive Science and the Social. London and New York: Routledge.
105.
UzendonskiMAHerticaMCalapucha TapuyE (2005) The phenomenology of perspectivism : Aesthetics, sound, and power in women’s songs from amazonian Ecuador. Current Anthropology46(4): 656–663.
106.
VighHESausdalDB (2014) From essence back to existence: Anthropology beyond the ontological turn. Anthropological Theory14(1): 49–73.
107.
VilaçaA (2010) Strange Enemies: Indigenous Agency and Scenes of Encounters in Amazonia. Durham: Duke University Press.
108.
Viveiros de CastroE (1992) From the Enemy’s Point of View: Humanity and Divinity in an Amazon Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
109.
Viveiros de CastroE (1998) Cosmological deixis and amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute4(3): 469–488.
110.
Viveiros De CastroE (2004) Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipiti: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America2(1): 2–22.
111.
Viveiros de CastroE (2011) Zeno and the art of anthropology: Of lies, beliefs, paradoxes, and other truths. Common Knowledge17(1): 128–145.
112.
Viveiros de CastroE (2012) Cosmological perspectivism in Amazonia and elsewhere. HAU: Masterclass Series1: 155.
113.
Viveiros de CastroE (2014) Cannibal Metaphysics. Minneapolis: Univocal.
114.
Viveiros de CastroE (2015a) The Relative Native. London: Hau Books.
115.
Viveiros de CastroE (2015) Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some Comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology33(1): 2–17. DOI: 10.3167/ca.2015.330102.
116.
WagnerR (1981) The Invention of Culture. Revisited. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
117.
WagnerR (2015) Facts force you to believe in them; perspectives encourage you to believe out of them. The Relative Native. Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Chicago, IL: HAU Books, pp. 295–324.
