The aim of this paper is to define transcendental relativization, by using the binary in some anthropological works, and to give a description of it along with Niklas Luhmann’s sociology. We examine how the binary [the West/non-West] has been used in some anthropological works and how it has contributed not only to understanding ‘them’ as a research object but also to realizing ‘our’ conceptual limitations. This paper is an attempt to deal with political or power-relational asymmetry and scientific observational asymmetry in anthropological works. Luhmann’s sociology, which is based on the functional analysis and theory of social systems, shows that the binary approach in anthropology can be seen as a semantic form of science system, which realizes the existence of blind spots in anthropological observation, and is a possible strategy for anthropological investigations.
AsadT (1986) The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Occasional paper series.
Washington:
Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
2.
AsadT (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.
Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
AsadT (2001)
Reading a modern classic: WC Smith’s ‘The Meaning and End of Religion’.History of Religions40(3): 205–22.
4.
AsadT (2003) Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
5.
AsadT (ed) (1973) Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter.
London:
Ithaca Press.
6.
BangstadS (2011)
Saba Mahmood and anthropological feminism after virtue.Theory Culture Society28(3): 28–54.
7.
BangstadS (2013)
Contesting secularism/s: Secularism and Islam in the work of Talal Asad. Anthropological Theory9(2): 188–208.
8.
CliffordJMarcusGE (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
9.
EickelmanDFPiscatoriJ (1996) Muslim Politics.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
10.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures.
New York:
Basic Books.
11.
GershonI (2005)
Seeing like a system: Luhmann for anthropologists.Anthropological Theory5(2): 99–116.
12.
GeschiereP (1997) The Modernity of Witchcraft: Politics and the Occult in Postcolonial Africa, Geschiere P and Roitman J (trans). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
13.
GraeberD (2015)
Radical alterity is just another way of saying ‘reality’: A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory5(2): 1–41.
HorbraadMPedersenMA (2017) The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
16.
IshiiM (2012)
Acting with things: Self-poiesis, actuality, and contingency in the formation of divine worlds. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory2(2): 371–388.
17.
KohnE (2013) How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
18.
KohnE (2015)
Anthropology of ontologies.Annual Review of Anthropology44: 311–327.
19.
LebnerA. (2019). No such thing as a concept: A radical tradition from Malinowski to Asad and Strathern. Anthropological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499618805916
20.
Lévi-Strauss C (1955) Tristes tropiques. Paris: Plon.
21.
LienhardtG (1953)
Modes of thought in primitive society.New Blackfriars34 (399): 269–277.
22.
LuhmannN (1970) Funktion und Kausalität. In: Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 9–30.
23.
LuhmannN (1980) Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik 1.
Frankfurt am Main:
Suhrkamp.
24.
LuhmannN (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft.
Frankfurt am Main:
Suhrkamp.
25.
LuhmannN (1992)
The concept of society.Thesis Eleven31(1): 67–80.
26.
LuhmannN (1995 [1984]) Social Systems, Bednarz J and Baecker D (trans). Stanford: Stanford University Press [Sozial Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp].
27.
LuhmannN (1998 [1992]) Observations on Modernity, Whobrey W (trans). Stanford: Stanford University Press [Beobachtungen der Moderne. Opladen: Westdeutscher].
28.
LuhmannN (2013 [1997]) Theory of Society.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press [Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp].
29.
MahmoodS (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
30.
MertonRK (1968) Manifest and Latent Function. In: Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press, 73–138.
31.
MimicaJ (2010)
Un/knowing and the practice of ethnography: A reflection on some Western cosmo-ontological notions and their anthropological application. Anthropological Theory10(3): 203–228.
32.
PalečekMRisjordM (2013)
Relativism and the ontological turn within anthropology.Philosophy of the Social Sciences43(1): 3–23.
33.
ParsonsTSmelserNJ (1956) Economy and Society: A Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory.
New York:
Free Press.
34.
PedersenMA (2011) Not Quite Shamans: Spirit Worlds and Political Lives in Northern Mongolia.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
35.
Said E (1978) Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
36.
ScotMW (2013)
What I’m reading: The anthropology of ontology (religious science?). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute19(4): 859–872.
37.
SprengerG (2017)
Communicated into being: Systems theory and the shifting of ontological status.Anthropological Theory17(1): 108–133.
38.
StrathernM (1988) The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
39.
StrathernM (1992) Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship, the New Reproductive Technologies.
Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
40.
StrathernM (2006) Bullet proofing: A tale from the UK. In: RilesA (ed) Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press, pp. 181–205.
41.
Todd Z ( 2016) An Indigenous Feminist's Take On The Ontological Turn: ‘Ontology’ Is Just Another Word For Colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29(1): 4–22.
42.
VighHESausdalDB (2014)
From essence back to existence: Anthropology beyond the ontological turn.Anthropological Theory14(1): 49–73.
43.
Viveiros de CastroE (1998)
Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute4(3): 469–488.
44.
Viveiros de CastroE (2004)
Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America2(1): 1–20.
