Validating and theorizing are understood as parts of a common intellectual practice – theory creation – to know why reality is, or is changing, the way it is. This essay’s goal is to encourage debate about the role of validation in anthropological practice, with the aim of increasing that role. Argument is presented in Socratic fashion by posing, and responding to, questions. The first question inquires: What is validation? The second asks: Is getting the facts important in validation? The third queries: How do you get the facts? The fourth probes: What about objectivity in a biased world? The fifth demands: Why are intersubjectivity and representativeness important? Finally, the sixth section asks: If you do validate, can you get to the truth of something? It is concluded that skilled validation creates approximate truth, which is as close to knowing what is that people get.
CliffordJ (1986) Introduction: Partial truths. In: CliffordJMarcusG (eds) Writing Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
CliffordJ (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature and Art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
CliffordJMarcusG (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
CrapanzanoV (1986) Hermes’ dilemma: The masking of subversion in ethnographic description. In: CliffordJMarcusG (eds) Writing Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
CurdMCoverJA (1998) Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues, New York: Norton.
13.
DarwinC (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: John Murray.
14.
DastonLGalisonP (2010) Objectivity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
DescolaP (2013) Beyond Nature and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
DescolaPPálssonG (1996) Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives, London: Routledge.
17.
DouglasH (2011) Facts, values, and objectivity. In: JarvieIZamora BonillaJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science, London: SAGE, pp. 513–529.
18.
EcheverríaJGómez RodríguezAAgazziE (2008) Epistemology and the Social, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
19.
EgganF (1954) Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist56(5): 743–763.
20.
Evans-PritchardEE (1940) The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21.
FaubionJMarcusG (2009) Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
FischerMMJ (2009) Anthropological Futures, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
FortesMEvans-PritchardEE (1940) African Political Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
FortunK (2012) Ethnography in late industrialism. Cultural Anthropology27(3): 446–464.
25.
FoucaultM (1990 [1978]) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, New York: Vintage.
PelsP (2014) After objectivity: An historical approach to the intersubjective in ethnography. Hau4(1): 211–236.
58.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
PrincipeL (1998) The Aspiring Adept: Robert Boyle and his Alchemical Quest, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
60.
PsillosS (1999) Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London: Routledge.
61.
RabinowP (1986) Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In: CliffordJMarcusG (eds) Writing Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.
62.
RabinowPSullivanW (1987) Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
Radcliffe-BrownARFordeD (1950) African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
ResnikD (1992) Convergent realism and approximate truth. Philosophy of Science Association1: 421–434.
65.
ReynaS (2002) Connections, London: Routledge.
66.
Reyna S (2004) Hard truth and validation: What Zeus understood. Working Paper #65. Halle/Saale: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.
67.
ReynaS (2010) Hard truths: Addressing the ‘crises’ in anthropology. In: ZenkerOKumollK (eds) Beyond Writing Culture: Current Intersections of Epistemologies and Practices of Representation, New York: Berghahn.
68.
ReynaS (2016) Starry Nights: Essays in Critical Structural Realism, New York: Berghahn.
69.
RiversWHR (1914) The History of Melanesian Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
RosaldoR (1989) Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis, Boston: Beacon Press.
71.
SargentR-M (1995) The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
WeinbergerD (2014) Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room, New York: Basic Books.
