Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article takes an epistemological turn, warning that certain areas of social and cultural anthropology face the death ray of bathos, due to deference to an essentialist skepticism. An approximating skepticism is suggested as a means of cheating the death ray. Foucault’s regimes of truth (RoT) standpoint is investigated using such skepticism, and shown to be made more politically relevant if transformed into an anthropology of hypocrisy. In the process of doing this, notions of epistemic practice as well as those of asserted and approximate truth are explicated. The anthropology of hypocrisy approach is formulated through an exploration of Foucault’s understanding of RoTs. The approach is applied through consideration of the work of four anthropologists who interrogate different aspects of imperial and liberal RoTs. Finally, it suggests how an anthropology of hypocrisy both makes anthropology more politically valuable, while cheating the death ray of bathos.

Keywords

Asserted and approximate truth epistemic bathos regimes of truth skepticism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alland A (2002) Race in Mind: Race, IQ, and Other Racisms. New York: Palgrave Mcmillian.

Anderson

(1983) In the Tracks of Historical Materialism, London: New Left Books.

Amies N (2011) Experts suggest US and allies involved in covert operations in Iran. Deutsche Welle. Available at: http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,15579161,00.html (accessed July 2011).

Annas

(1996) Skepticism: old and new. In: Frede

Striker

(eds) Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–254.

Arensberg

(1954) The community study method. American Journal of Sociology 60(2): 101–124.

Arguimbau N (2010) The imminent crash of the oil supply. Information Clearing House. Available at: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article/25306.htm (accessed: May 2010).

Austin-Broos

(2011) The politics of difference and equality: remote Aboriginal communities, public discourse and Australian anthropology. Transforming Anthropology 19(2): 139–145.

Ayer

(1936) Language, Truth, and Logic, London: Gollancz.

Baudrillard

(1976 [2007]) Forget Foucault, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Boas

(1896) Limitations of the comparative method of anthropology. Science 4(103): 901–908.

11.

Boas F (1912) Changes in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants. New York: Columbia University Press.

12.

Boghossian

(2006) Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Brace CL (2005) “Race” is a Four-Letter Word: The Genesis of the Concept. New York: Oxford.

14.

Calinescu

(1987) Five Faces of Modernity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

15.

Carnap

(1950) Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Review of International Philosophy 4: 20–40.

16.

Comte

(1877 [1830–42]) Cours de philosophie positive 6 vols, 4th edn. Paris: Baillière.

17.

Dennett D (1998) Postmodernism and truth. Paper delivered at the World Congress of Philosophy. Available at: http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/postmod.tru.htm (accessed: September 2011).

18.

DeRose

Warfield

(1999) Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

19.

Diamond

Schein

(1966) The Waste Collectors, New York: Department of Anthropology, Columbia University.

20.

Dreyfus

Rabinow

(1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Eggan

(1954) Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison. American Anthropologist 56: 743–763.

22.

Evans-Pritchard

(1940) The Nuer, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Faubion J and Rabinow P (1998) Introduction. In: Faubion J and Rabinow P (eds) The Essential Works of Foucault, 3 vols. New York: New Press, p. 10.

24.

Feyerabend

(1975 [2010]) Against Method, London: Verso.

25.

Foster JB and McChesney R (2009) Monopoly-finance capital and the paradox of accumulation. Monthly Review. Available at: http://www.monthltreview.org/091001foster-mcchesney.php (accessed: November 2010).

26.

Foucault

(1980) Power/Knowledge, New York: Pantheon.

27.

Foucault M (1983) Discourse and truth: the problematization of parrhesia. Six lectures given by Michel Foucault at the University of California at Berkeley, Oct.–Nov. Available at: http://foucault.info/documents/parrhesia/ (accessed: December 2011).

28.

Foucault

(1998) Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, vol. 2: The Essential Foucault 1954–1983, 3 vols, New York: The New Press.

29.

Freedom House (2010) Freedom in the World 2010. Washngton, DC: Freedom House.

30.

Gane

(1986) Towards a Critique of Foucault, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

31.

Ganser

(2007) Les Armées secrètes de l’OTAN, Gladio et Terrorisme en Europe de l’Ouest, Paris: Éditions Demi-Lune.

32.

Golomb

(1995) In Search of Authenticity: From Kierkegaard to Camus, London: Routledge.

33.

Goodenough

(1956) Componential analysis and the study of meaning. Language 32(1): 195–216.

34.

Gravlee

Russell Bernard

Leonard

(2003) Heredity, environment, and cranial form: a re-analysis of Boas’s immigrant data. American Anthropologist 105(1): 125–138.

35.

Hamilton

(1996) The Social Misconstruction of Reality: Validity and Verification in the Scholarly Community, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

36.

Hansen

(2009) Storms of My Grandchildren: The Truth about the Coming Climate Catastrophe, New York: Bloomsbury.

37.

Harris

(1964) The Nature of Cultural Things, New York: Random House.

38.

Hempel

(1945) Studies in the logic of confirmation, parts 1 and 2. Mind 54: 1–26, 97–121.

39.

Holloway

(2002) Head to head with Boas: did he err on the plasticity of head form? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(23): 14622–14623.

40.

Huppert

(1974) Divinato & eruditio: thoughts on Foucault. History and Theory 13: 191–207.

41.

Jensen AR (1969) How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review 39: 1–123.

42.

Kant I (1795) Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. Available at: http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm (accessed April 2011).

43.

Kitcher

(1993) The Advancement of Science; Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

44.

Klein

(1981) Certainty: A Refutation of Skepticism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

45.

Kuhn

(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

46.

Kunstler

(2006) The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the 21st Century, New York: Grove Press.

47.

Latour

(1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

48.

Leech G (2009) US policy towards Venezuela and Colombia will change little under Obama. Venezuelanalysis.com. Available at: http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4136 (accessed: September 2010).

49.

Lindholm

(2007) Culture and Authenticity, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

50.

Malinowski

(1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

51.

Marcus

(2002) Beyond Malinowski and after writing culture: on the future of cultural anthropology and the predicament of ethnography. Australian Journal of Anthropology 13(2): 1919–1999.

52.

Mitchell JC (1973) Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction. The Hague: Mouton.

53.

Murdock

(1949) Social Structure, New York: Macmillan Co.

54.

Nelder C (2009) The next oil crisis is just ahead. Energy and Capital eLetter. Available at: http:/energyandcapital.net/articles/peak-oil-update/954 (accessed October 2009).

55.

Niiniluoto

(1987) Truthlikeness, Dordrecht: Reidel.

56.

Panourgiá

(2011) Tightrope (in the manner of Antonio Lauria-Perricelli). Transforming Anthropology 19(2): 146–153.

57.

Pilger J (2008) Latin America: the attack on democracy. New Statesman. Available at: http://www.newstatesman.com/world-affairs/2008/04/pilger-chavez-venezuela (accessed: September 2010).

58.

Posecznick

(2011) What’s in a name? Negotiating and wielding dangerous knowledge in anthropology. Anthropology News 52(2): 5–5.

59.

Quine

(1960) Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

60.

Rabinow

Sullivan

(1978) Interpretive Social Science: A Reader, Berkeley: University of California Press.

61.

Rabinow

Sullivan

(1998) Series Preface. Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, vol. 2: The Essential Foucault 1954–198, 3 vols, New York: The New Press.

62.

Radcliffe-Brown

(1935) On the concept of function in the social sciences. American Anthropologist 37(3): 394–402.

63.

Radcliffe-Brown

(1940) On social structure. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 70(1): 1–12.

64.

Reyna

(1994) Literary anthropology and the case against science. Man 29(3): 572–581.

65.

Reyna S (2004) Hard truth and validation: what Zeus understood. Working Paper No. 65. Halle/Saale: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.

66.

Reyna

(2010) Hard truths: addressing a crisis in ethnography. In: Zanker

Kumoll

(eds) Beyond Writing Culture: Intersections of Epistemologies and Representational Practices, New York: Berghahn.

67.

Reyna

(2012) Neo-Boasianism, a form of critical structural realism: it’s better than the alternative. Anthropological Theory 12(1): 73–99.

68.

Rushton JP (1995) Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective (2nd special abridged ed.). Port Huron, MI: Charles Darwin Research Institute.

69.

Schiller

(2011) Liberal and Bolivarian regimes of truth: toward a critically engaged anthropology in Caracas, Venezuela. Transforming Anthropology 19(1): 35–42.

70.

Schlick

(1925–36) Positivism and realism. In: Mulder

(ed.) Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Vienna Circle Collection, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 259–284.

71.

Sparks

Jantz

(2002) A reassessment of human cranial plasticity: Boas revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(23): 14636–14639.

72.

Trilling

(1974) Sincerity and Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

73.

Tyler

(1986) Post-modern ethnography: from document of the occult to occult document. In: Clifford

Marcus

(eds) Writing Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press.

74.

Tylor

(1958 [1870]) Primitive Culture, 2 vols, New York: Harper and Row.

75.

Uelman

(1996) Crocodiles in the bathtub: maintaining the independence of state Supreme Courts in an era of judicial politicization. Notre Dame Law Review 72: 1133–1153.

76.

Unger

(1975) Ignorance: A Case for Skepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

77.

Van Velsen J (1958) The extended-case method and situational analysis. In: Epstein AL (ed.) Manchester: University of Manchester Press.

78.

Venkatesan

(2010) Ontology is just another word for culture? Critique of Anthropology 30(2): 152–200.

79.

Wade N (2010) Anthropology a science? Statement deepens a rift. New York Times, 9 December.

80.

Walzer

(1991) The politics of Michel Foucault. In: Hoy

(ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Blackwell.

81.

Weston

(1992) Approximate truth and scientific realism. Philosophy of Science 59: 53–74.

82.

Zammito

(2004) A Nice Arrangement of Epistemes: Post-positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

An epistemological turn: Cheating the death ray of bathos by building an anthropology of hypocrisy (using Foucault)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References