This study examined the cases of women on death in which evidence of the defendant’s intellectual disability or mental illness was presented at trial. Of the total population of 52 women on death row at the beginning of 2020 and seven recently-executed women, over 50% qualified for the study. According to expert testimony, most of the women in the sample had a below-average IQ score and/or a neurological deficit, and all but three suffered from a serious mental illness. Almost all had abusive and dysfunctional backgrounds. Recent Supreme Court rulings have banned the execution of defendants with intellectual disability and opened the door to a consideration of execution exemption for defendants with severe mental illness or brain abnormalities. However, considerable judicial equivocation over the meaning and measurement of mental impairments remains. Even as a mitigating factor, the mental health problems of the defendants in this study were given little weight.
Allen v. State (2013) No. SC11-1206.
Supreme Court of Florida.
2.
American Bar Association (2006) Mental illness resolution, policy number: 2006AM 122A. Available at: www.americanbar.org (accessed 5 February 2020).
3.
Atkins v. Virginia (2002) 536. U. S. 304.
4.
BaumgartnerFRNeillB (2017) Does the death penalty target people who are mentally ill? We checked. The Washington Post, 3 April. Available at: www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/ (accessed 11 January 2020).
5.
BeitschR (2017) Should states ban the death penalty for people with severe mental illness? Public Broadcasting System (PBS), 17 April. Available at: www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/states-ban-death (accessed 10 December 2019).
6.
BlumeJHGarveySPJohnsonSL (2001)
Future dangerousness in Capital cases: Always ‘at issue’. Cornell Law Review86(2): 397–410.
7.
BrinkJ (2005)
Epidemiology of mental illness in a correctional system. Current Opinion in Psychiatry18(5): 536–541.
8.
Caudill v. Conover (2018) No. 14–5418. U. S. Court of Appeals.
9.
Chamberlin v. State (2010) No. 2008-DR-0160 Supreme Court of Mississippi.
10.
ChitwoodT (2015) Woman sentenced to death for hiring man to kill her daughter. Miami Herald, 18 November. Available at: www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/ (accessed 12 July 2019).
11.
CrowellH (2016)
The writing is on the wall: How the Briseno factors create an unacceptable risk of executing persons with intellectual disability. Texas Law Review94(4): 743–784.
12.
CunninghamMDVigenMP (2002)
Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: A critical review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences and the Law20(1–2): 191–210.
13.
Death Penalty Information Center. Available at: www.deathpenaltyinfo.org (accessed 12 December 2018).
14.
DeMatteoDMarczykGPichM (2007)
A national survey of state legislation defining mental retardation: Implications for policy and practice after Atkins. Behavioral Sciences and the Law25(6): 781–802.
FarringerJL (2001)
The competency conundrum: Problems courts have faced in applying different standards for competency to be executed. Vanderbilt Law Review54(6): 2441–2493.
20.
FisherJ (1992) Homicide: Do acquired brain injuries have a role in culpability and causation? Presented to the Psychological Research and Training Clinic Case Conference, September. New York: State University of New York at Binghamton.
21.
Ford v Wainwright (1986) 477 U. S. 399.
22.
FreedmanDHemenwayD (2000)
Precursors of lethal violence: A death row sample. Soc Sci Med50(12): 1757–1770.
23.
Hall v. Florida (2014) 572. U.S. 701.
24.
JaffeDJ (2017) Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill.
New York:
Prometheus.
25.
JohnsonSLBlumeJHPaavolaE, et al. (2018)
Protecting people with intellectual disability from wrongful execution: Guidelines for competent representation. Hofstra Law Review46(4): 1107–1159.
26.
KelloggB (2019) Court documents: Stepmom acting as own lawyer has brain damage. 11ALIVE, 23 April. Available at: www.11alive.com/article/news/court-documents (accessed 3 January 2020).
27.
Legal Information Institute (n.d.) 18 U.S. Code #3592. Mitigating and aggravating factors to be considered in determining whether a sentence of death is justified. Available at: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3592 (accessed 9 January 2020).
LynchSMFritchAHeathNM (2012)
Looking beneath the surface: The nature of incarcerated women’s experiences of interpersonal violence, treatment needs, and mental health. Feminist Criminology7(4): 381–400.
30.
Mental illness issues in the Aileen Wuornos case (n.d.) Mental illness and the death penalty. Capital punishment in context. Available at:www.capitalpunishmentincontext.org (accessed 28 June 2020).
TotonchiS (2020) Georgia’s unconstitutional standard for determining intellectual disability in death penalty cases. In: American Constitution Society Blog, 20 March. Available at: www.acslaw.org/expertforum/georgias (accessed 4 May 2020).
50.
TripodiSJPettus-DavisC (2013)
Histories of childhood victimization and subsequent mental health problems, substance use, and sexual victimization for a sample of incarcerated women in the U. S. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry36(1): 30–40.
51.
Trop v. Dulles (1958) 356. U. S. 86.
52.
VarneyS (2014) By the numbers: Mental illness behind bars. Kaiser Health News. PBS/OPB. Beyond the Canvas. Available at: www.pbs.org/…/numbers-mental-illness-behind-bars (accessed 10 January 2020).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
