Several state prisons have provided tablets to imprisoned people which appears to be indicative of a larger trend to increase access to technology for imprisoned people. However, access to and the use of technology in prison has not been evaluated by social scientists. This study surveyed 70 prison officials from six states to report their attitudes toward access to and the use of tablets in prison for imprisoned people and for the prisons themselves. Survey results show that prison officials who work in prisons with more access to technology are more likely to believe technology to be a positive contribution for imprisoned people.
American Prison Data Systems (APDS) (n.d.) APDS evidence-based, recidivism reduction programming to address the requirements of the First Step Act. Available at: https://apdscorporate.com/ (accessed 23 January 2021).
2.
BulmanP (2009)
Using technology to make prisons and jails safer. NIJ Journal262: 38–41.
3.
Casey-AcevedoKBakkenTKarleA (2004)
Children visiting mothers in prison: The effects on mothers behaviour and disciplinary adjustment. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology37(3): 418–430.
4.
CastellsM (1996) The Rise of the Network Society.
Cambridge, MA:
Blackwell Ltd.
5.
CreweBLieblingAHulleyS (2011)
Staff culture, use of authority and prisoner quality of life in public and private sector prisons. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology44(1): 94–115.
6.
DecellesKATeslukPETaxmanFS (2013)
A field investigation of multilevel cynicism toward change. Organization Science24(1): 154–171.
JewkesYJohnstonH (2009) “
Cavemen in an Era of Speed-of-Light Technology”: Historical and contemporary perspectives on communication within prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice48(2): 132–143.
14.
JewkesYReisdorfBC (2016)
A brave new world: The problems and opportunities presented by new media technologies in prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice16(5): 534–551.
15.
JPay, Inc. (n.d.) JPay, Inc.: The trusted leader in inmate services. Available at: https://www.jpay.com/PMusic.aspx (accessed 23 January 2021).
16.
JurikNC (1985)
Individual and organizational determinants of correctional officer attitudes toward inmates*. Criminology23(3): 523–540.
17.
KerrAWillisM (2018)
Prisoner use of information and communications technology. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice (560): 1.
18.
KnightV (2015)
Some observations on the digital landscape of prisons today. Prison Service Journal220: 3–9.
KnightVVan De SteeneS (2017)
The capacity and capability of digital innovation in prisons: Towards smart prisons. Advancing Corrections4: 88–101.
21.
LambertEGGordonJPaolineEAIII, et al. (2018)
Workplace demands and resources as antecedents of jail officer perceived danger at work. Journal of Crime and Justice41(1): 98–118.
22.
LambertEGHoganNL (2010)
Wanting change: The relationship of perceptions of organizational innovation with correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Criminal Justice Policy Review21(2): 160–184.
23.
LambertEGHoganNLBarton-BellessaSM (2011)
The association between perceptions of distributive justice and procedural justice with support of treatment and support of punishment among correctional staff. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation50(4): 202–220.
24.
LermanAEPageJ (2012)
The state of the job: An embedded work role perspective on prison officer attitudes. Punishment & Society14(5): 503–529.
25.
McCordJ (2003)
Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science587(1): 16–30.
26.
McDougallCPearsonDASTorgersonDJ, et al. (2017)
The effect of digital technology on prisoner behavior and reoffending: A natural stepped-wedge design. Journal of Experimental Criminology13(4): 455–482.
27.
MisisMKimBCheesemanK, et al. (2013)
The impact of correctional officer perceptions of inmates on job stress. SAGE Open3(2): 215824401348969.
MorrisJKnightV (2018)
Co-producing digitally-enabled courses that promote desistance in prison and probation settings. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice 4(11): 1–20.
30.
PapachristosA (2011)
Too big to fail. The science and politics of violence prevention. Criminology & Public Policy10(4): 1053–1061.
31.
PrattJ (2007) Penal Populism.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
32.
ReisdorfBCRikardRV (2018)
Digital rehabilitation: A model of reentry into the Digital Age. American Behavioral Scientist62(9): 1273–1290.
33.
RudesDSLerchJTaxmanFS (2011)
Implementing a reentry framework at a correctional facility: Challenges to the culture. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation50(8): 467–491.
StohrMKHemmensCCollinsPA, et al. (2012)
Assessing the organizational culture in a jail setting. The Prison Journal92(3): 358–387.
36.
TartaroCLevyM (2017)
Visitation modality preferences for adults visiting jails. The Prison Journal97(5): 562–584.
37.
TewksburyR (2010)
Prisons in the last ten years. Victims & Offenders5(3): 240–252.
38.
TewksburyRHigginsGE (2006)
Prison staff and work stress: The role of organizational and emotional influences. American Journal of Criminal Justice30(2): 247–266.
39.
WagnerPSawyerW (2018)
States of incarceration: The global context of 2018. Prison Policy Initiative. Available at: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/global/2018.html (accessed 23 January 2021).
