Restrictive housing substantially limits inmate movement and privileges. Proponents argue it creates safer prison systems, while opponents claim it does not and harms inmates. However, few studies have systematically examined restrictive housing through the perspective of those who work in prison systems or scrutinized the diverse dimensions relevant to its appraisal. This study addresses this gap by drawing on qualitative data to examine how such individuals view the housing, its operational challenges, effectiveness, possible improvements, and potential alternatives. We present findings along each of these dimensions and then discuss their implications for research and policy.
BeckA. J. (2015). Use of restrictive housing in U.S. Prisons and jails, 2011–12. U.S. Department of Justice.
2.
BidnaH. (1975). Effects of increased security on prison violence. Journal of Criminal Violence, 3(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(75)90097-5
3.
BottomsA. E. (1999). Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons. Crime and Justice, 26, 205–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/449298.
4.
BriggsC. S.SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 41(4), 1341–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01022.x
5.
ButlerH. D.SolomonS.SpohnR. (2018). Programming in restrictive housing: Considerations for improving outcome evaluations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1174–1191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818780450
6.
ButlerH. D.SteinerB. (2017). Examining the use of disciplinary segregation within and across prisons. Justice Quarterly, 34(2), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1162319
7.
CarsonL. (2020). Release from long-term restrictive housing. In MiddlemasK. M.SmileyC. J. (Eds.), Prisoner reentry in the 21st century (pp. 96–106). Routledge.
ClearT. R.FrostN. A. (2014). The punishment imperative. New York University Press.
10.
Correctional Leaders Association, and the Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law (CLA-ALCPIL). (2020). Time-in-cell 2019: A snapshot of restrictive housing based on a nationwide survey of U.S. prison systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
11.
CreweB.LawsB. (2018). Subcultural adaptations to incarceration. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prisons and imprisonment (pp. 125–142). Oxford University Press.
12.
CrouchB. M.MarquartJ. W. (1989). An appeal to justice: Litigated reform of texas prisons. University of Texas Press.
13.
DigardL.VankoE.SullivanS. (2018). Rethinking restrictive housing: Lessons from five U.S. Jail and prison systems. Vera Institute.
14.
FerdikF.SmithH. P. (2017). Correctional officer safety and wellness literature synthesis. National Institute of Justice.
15.
FosterH. (2016). The conditions of confinement in restrictive housing. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 85–116). National Institute of Justice.
16.
FrostN.MonteiroC. (2016). Administrative segregation in U.S. Prisons. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 1–48). National Institute of Justice.
17.
GarciaM. (Ed.). (2016). Restrictive housing in the U.S. National Institute of Justice.
18.
GarlandD. (2013). The 2012 Sutherland address: Penality and the penal state. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal, 51(3), 475–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12015
19.
GendreauP.GogginC. (2019). Solitary confinement and punishment: Effects on misconducts and recidivism. In PolaschekD. L. L.DayA.HollinC. R. (Eds.), The wiley international handbook of correctional psychology (pp. 131–143). Wiley.
20.
GendreauP.LabrecqueR. M. (2018). The effects of administrative segregation: A lesson in knowledge accumulation. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of prisons and imprisonment (pp. 340–366). Oxford University Press.
21.
GottschalkM. (2006). The prison and the gallows: The politics of mass incarceration in america. Cambridge University Press.
KapoorR.TrestmanR. (2016). Mental health effects of restrictive housing. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 199–232). National Institute of Justice.
25.
KingR. D. (1999). The rise and rise of supermax: An American solution in search of a problem?Punishment and Society, 1(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624749922227766
26.
KingR. D. (2005). Effects of supermax custody. In LieblingA.MarunaS. (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 118–145). Willan Publishing.
27.
KingR. D. (2018). A comparison of British and American policies for managing dangerous prisoners: A question of legitimacy. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook (pp. 367–394). New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023
29.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
30.
KupersT. A. (2017). Solitary: The inside story of supermax isolation and how we can abolish it. University of California Press.
31.
KurkiL.MorrisN. (2001).The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. Crime and Justice, 28, 385–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/652214
32.
LabrecqueR. M.CampbellC. M.LaBrancheK. J.ReddyL.ZavitaK. R.MorganR. D. (2021). Administrative segregation: A review of state and Federal policies. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(7), 718–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403421998440
33.
LabrecqueR. M.MearsD. P. (2019). Prison system vs. critics’ views on the use of restrictive housing: Objective risk classification or ascriptive assignment?The Prison Journal, 99(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519825492
34.
LabrecqueR. M.SmithP. (2019a). The impact of restrictive housing on inmate behavior: A systematic review of the evidence. In HuebnerB. M.FrostN. A. (Eds.), Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions (pp. 290–310). Routledge.
35.
LabrecqueR. M.SmithP. (2019b). Reducing institutional disorder: Using the inmate risk assessment for segregation placement to triage treatment services at the front end of prison sentences. Crime and Delinquency, 65(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717748946
36.
LawsB. (2021). Segregation seekers: An alternative perspective on the solitary confinement debate. British Journal of Criminology, 61(6), 1452–1468. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azab032
MearsD. P. (2016). Critical research gaps in understanding the effects of prolonged time in restrictive housing on inmates and the institutional environment. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 233–295). National Institute of Justice.
42.
MearsD. P.HughesV.PestaG. B.BalesW. D.BrownJ. M.CochranJ. C.WooldredgeJ. (2019). The new solitary confinement? A conceptual framework for guiding and assessing research and policy on “restrictive housing”. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(10), 1427–1444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819852770
MorganR. D.GendreauP.SmithP.GrayA.LabrecqueR. M.MacLeanN.Van HornS. A.BolanosA. D.BatastiniA. B.MillsJ. F. (2016). Quantitative synthesis of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000089
NadkarniN. M.HasbachP. H.ThysT.CrockettE. G.SchnackerL. (2017). Impacts of nature imagery on people in severely nature-deprived environments. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(7), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1518
48.
O’KeefeM. L. (2008). Administrative segregation from within: A corrections perspective. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310999
49.
PrattT. (2018). Addicted to incarceration: Corrections policy and the politics of misinformation in the United States (2nd ed.). Sage.
50.
RivelandC. (1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations. National Institute of Corrections.
51.
SakodaR. T.SimesJ. T. (2021). Solitary confinement and the U.S. Prison boom. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(1), 66–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419895315
52.
SalernoL. M.ZgobaK. M. (2020). Disciplinary segregation and its effects on in-prison outcomes. The Prison Journal, 100(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885519882326
53.
ShalevS. (2009). Supermax: Controlling risk through solitary confinement. Willan.
54.
ShamesA.WilcoxJ.SubramanianR. (2015). Solitary confinement: Common misconceptions and emerging safe alternatives. The Vera Institute.
55.
SmithP. (2016). Towards an understanding of “what works” in segregation. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 331–366). National Institute of Justice.
56.
SmithP. S. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 441–528. https://doi.org/10.1086/500626
57.
SpohnC.BrennanP. K. (Eds.) (2020). Handbook on sentencing policies and practices in the 21st century. Routledge.
58.
SteinerB.CainC. M. (2016). The relationship between inmate misconduct, institutional violence, and administrative segregation. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 165–197). National Institute of Justice.
59.
SundtJ. L. (2016). The effect of administrative segregation on prison order and organizational culture. In GarciaM. (Ed.), Restrictive housing in the U.S. (pp. 297–330). National Institute of Justice.
60.
SundtJ. L. (2017). Solitary confinement: Restrictive housing, segregation, and the isolation of inmates. In Hilinski-RosickC. M.WalshJ. P. (Eds.), Issues in corrections: Research, policy, and future prospects (pp. 111–134). Lexington.
61.
SundtJ. L.CastellanoT. C.BriggsC. S. (2008). The sociopolitical context of prison violence and its control. The Prison Journal, 88(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507310994
62.
TravisJ.WesternB.RedburnS. (Eds.) (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States. The National Academies Press.
