Drawing on a long-term research project across a number of British Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs), this article considers the relationship between authority and affect. In contrast to much criminological literature on the prison, which advances a liberal political account in which power is constantly negotiated and based on mutual recognition, in detention, this article suggests, staff authority rests on an abrogation of their self rather than engagement with the other. Officers turn away (deny) and switch off (emotionally withdraw) from those before them in order to do their job. In these terms, we bear witness to the affective nature of wielding power at the border. Operating without a clear basis of moral legitimacy, officer testimonies make clear, is painful and corrosive, for staff and for detainees. It may work, in other words, but at what cost?
AasKFBosworthM (eds) (2013) The Borders of Punishment.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
2.
AhmedS (2004a) The Cultural Politics of Emotions.
London:
Routledge.
3.
AhmedS (2004b)
Affective economies. Social Text22(2): 117–139.
4.
ArendtH (2003) Responsibility and Judgment.
New York, NY:
Schocken Books.
5.
BosworthM (2013) Can immigration detention be legitimate? In: AasKFBosworthM (eds) Migration and Punishment: Citizenship, Crime Control, and Social Exclusion.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.149–164.
6.
BosworthM (2014) Inside Immigration Detention.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
7.
BosworthM (2016) Immigration detention, ambivalence and the colonial other. In: ErikssonA (ed.) Punishing the Other.
Abingdon:
Routledge, pp.145–164.
8.
BosworthM (2018a) “Working in this place turns you racist”: Staff, race and belonging in immigration detention. In: BosworthMParmarAVázquezY (eds) Race, Migration and Criminal Justice: Enforcing the Boundaries of Belonging.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.214–228.
9.
BosworthM (2018b) Annex 10. Staff culture in immigration removal centres. In: Assessment of Government Progress in Implementing the Report on the Welfare in Detention of Vulnerable Persons: A Follow-Up Report to the Home Office by Stephen Shaw. Cm 9661. London: HMSO, pp.207–211.
10.
BosworthMGerlachAAitkenD (2016) Understanding Staff Culture at IRC Heathrow.
Oxford:
Centre for Criminology.
11.
BosworthMKelleziB (2017)
Doing research in immigration removal centres: Ethics, emotions and impact.Criminology & Criminal Justice17(2): 121–137.
12.
BosworthMSladeG (2014)
In search of recognition: Gender and staff–detainee relations in a British Immigration Detention Centre.Punishment & Society16(2): 169–186.
13.
BottomsAETankebeJ (2012)
Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in Criminal Justice.The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology102(1): 119–170.
14.
BradfordBQuintonP (2014)
Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary.British Journal of Criminology54: 1023–1046.
15.
BraithwaiteJ (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
16.
BrownMScheptJ (2017)
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies. Punishment & Society19(4): 440–462.
17.
Carrabine E (2004) Power, Discourse, and Resistance: A Geneaology of the Strangeways Prison Riot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
18.
ChamberlenA (2016)
Embodying prison pain: Women's' self-injury practices in prison and the emotions of punishment. Theoretical Criminology20(2): 205–219.
19.
CloughPHalleyJ (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
20.
CohenSTaylorL (1979) Psychological Survival: The Experience of Long-Term Imprisonment.
London:
Penguin.
21.
CrawleyE (2004a) Doing Prison Work: The Public and Private Lives of Prison Officers.
Cullompton:
Willan.
22.
CrawleyE (2004b)
Emotion and performance: Prison officers and the presentation of self in prisons.Punishment & Society6(4): 411–427.
23.
CrawleyE (2011) Managing prisoners, managing emotion: The dynamics of age, culture and identity. In: KarstedtSLoaderIStrangH (eds) Emotions, Crime and Justice.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.255–271.
24.
CreweB (2009) The Prisoner Community.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
25.
CreweB (2011)
Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy.European Journal of Criminology8(6): 455–468.
26.
CreweBLieblingAHulleyS (2015) ‘
Staff–prisoner relationships, staff professionalism and the use of authority in public- and private-sector prisons. Law & Social Inquiry40(2): 309–344.
27.
DolovichS (2004)
Legitimate punishment in liberal democracy. Buffalo Criminal Law Review7(2): 307–442.
28.
GrahamM (2002)
Emotional bureaucracies, emotions, civil servants and immigrants in the Swedish welfare state.Ethos30(3): 199–226.
29.
HallA (2010) ‘
These people could be anyone’: Fear, contempt (and empathy) in a British Immigration Removal Centre.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(6): 881–898.
30.
HallA (2012) Border Watch: Cultures of Immigration, Detention and Control.
London:
Pluto Press.
31.
HaneyL (2016)
Prisons of the past: Penal nationalism and the politics of punishment in Central Europe.Punishment & Society18(3): 346–368.
32.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) (2018) Report of an Unannounced Inspection of Heathrow Immigration Removal Centre Harmondsworth Site.
London:
HMIP.
KarstedtSLoaderIStrangH (eds) (2011) Emotions, Crime and Justice.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
37.
KatzJ (1988) Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil.
Berkeley:
California University Press.
38.
KatzJ (1999) On Emotions.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
39.
Jackson J, Bradford B, Stanko B and Hohl K (2013) Just Authority? Trust in the Police in England and Wales. Abingdon: Routledge.
40.
LermanAPageJ (2012)
The state of the job: An embedded work role perspective on prison officer attitudes.Punishment & Society14(5): 503–529.
41.
LevinasE (1969) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority.
Pittsburgh, PA:
Duquesne University Press.
42.
LieblingA (2004) Prisons and their Moral Performance.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
43.
LieblingA (2011)
Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: Legitimacy and authority revisited. European Journal of Criminology8(6): 484–499.
44.
LieblingATankebeJ (eds) (2015) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
MurphyKTylerT (2008)
Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology38: 652–668.
47.
NussbaumM (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
48.
NussbaumM (2004) Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
49.
SedgwickEK (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
50.
SennettR (1980) Authority.
New York, NY:
Alfred A. Knopf publishing.
51.
ShawS (2018) Assessment of Government Progress in Implementing the Report on the Welfare in Detention of Vulnerable Persons: A Follow-Up Report to the Home Office by Stephen Shaw. Cm 9661.
London:
HMSO.
52.
SparksR (1994)
Can prisons be legitimate? Penal politics, privatization and timeliness of an old idea.British Journal of Criminology34: 14–28.
53.
SparksRBottomsAEHayW (1996) Prisons and the Problem of Order.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
54.
SykesG (1958) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
55.
UgelvikT (2016)
Techniques of legitimation: The narrative construction of legitimacy among immigration detention officers. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal12(2): 215–232.
56.
WeberM (1997) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
London:
Routledge.
57.
WooldredgeJSteinerB (2016)
The exercise of power in prison organizations and implications for legitimacy. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology106(1): 125–166.
