The number of life-sentenced prisoners in the United States is growing, an increase that deserves ongoing critical consideration. Such consideration is heightened by the fact that many lifers undergo significant personal transformations during their incarceration. This paper uses interviews with 21 life-sentenced prisoners in the state of Washington to document the degree of such transformations. These transformations create compelling questions for theoretical strains in the sociology of punishment that draw upon the seminal work of Durkheim. Further, those transformations deserve greater consideration as the politics and practices of incarceration continue to unfold in the United States.
AdamsW (1995)
The incarceration of older criminals: Balancing safety, cost, and humanitarian concerns. Nova Law Review19: 465–486.
2.
AdayR (1994)
Golden years behind bars: Special programs and facilities for elderly inmates. Federal Probation58: 47–54.
3.
AdayR (2003) Aging Prisoners: Crisis in American Corrections.
Westport, CT:
Praeger Publishing.
4.
American Civil Liberties Union (2012) At America’s Expense: The Mass Incarceration of the Elderly.
Washington, DC:
ACLU.
5.
ApplegateBCullenFFisherBet al. (2000)
Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology38: 719–754.
6.
AppletonC andGroverB (2007)
The pros and cons of life imprisonment. British Journal of Criminology47: 597–615.
7.
AuerhahnK (2002)
Selective incapacitation, three strikes, and the problem of aging prison populations.Criminology and Public Policy1: 353–388.
8.
BeckettK (1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics.
Oxford and New York:
Oxford University Press.
9.
ChiuT (2010) It’s About Time: Aging Prisoners, Increasing Costs, and Geriatric Release.
New York:
Vera Institute.
10.
CunninghamM andSorensonJ (2006)
Nothing to lose? A comparative examination of prison misconduct rates among life-without-parole and other long-term high-security inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior33: 683–705.
11.
DouglasM (2002) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo.
London:
Routledge.
12.
DurkheimE (1984) The Division of Labor in Society.
New York:
Macmillan.
13.
EricksonK (2004) Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance.
Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
14.
FlanaganT (1981)
Dealing with long-term confinement: Adaptive strategies and perspectives among long-term prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior8: 201–222.
15.
FlanaganT (1995) Adaptation and adjustment among long-term prisoners. In: FlanaganT (ed.) Long-Term Imprisonment: policy, Science and Correctional Practice.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, pp.109–116.
16.
GarlandD (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
17.
GottschalkM (2013)
Sentenced to life: Penal reform and the most severe sanctions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science9: 353–382.
18.
HammM (1997) The offender self-help movement as correctional treatment. In: Van Voorhis, PBraswellm, M andLester, D (eds) Correctional Counselling and Rehabilitation.
Cincinnati, OH:
Anderson, pp.211–224.
19.
Harvard Law Review Association (2006)
A matter of life and death: The effect of life-without-parole statutes on capital punishment. Harvard Law Review119: 1838–1854.
Human Rights Watch (2012) Old behind Bars: The Aging Prison Population in the United States.
Washington, DC:
Human Rights Watch.
22.
IrwinJ (2009) Lifers: Seeking Redemption in Prison.
New York:
Routledge.
23.
JohnsonR andDobrzanskaA (2005)
Mature coping among life-sentenced inmates: An exploratory study of adjustment dynamics. Corrections Compendium30: 8–38.
24.
JohnsonR andMcGunigall-SmithS (2008)
Life without parole, America’s other death penalty: Notes on life under sentence of death by incarceration. Prison Journal88: 328–346.
25.
KazemianL andTravisJ (2015)
Imperative for inclusion of long termers and lifers in research and policy.Criminology and Public Policy14: 1–41.
26.
KerbsJ andJolleyJ (2009)
A commentary on age segregation for older prisoners: Philosophical and pragmatic considerations for correctional institutions. Criminal Justice Review34: 119–131.
27.
LebelTRitchieM andMarunaS (2015)
Helping others as a response to reconcile a criminal past: The role of the wounded healer in prisoner reentry programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior42: 108–120.
28.
LeigeyM (2015) The Forgotten Men: Serving a Life Without Parole Sentence.
New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press.
29.
LiemM (2016) After Life Imprisonment: Reentry in the Era of Mass Incarceration.
New York:
NYU Press.
30.
McAdamsD (2007) The Redemptive Self: Stories Americans Live By.
Oxford and New York:
Oxford University Press.
31.
MacKenzieD andGoodsteinLS (1985)
Long-term incarceration impacts and characteristics of long-term offenders: An empirical analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior12: 395–414.
32.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives.
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
33.
MarunaSLeDelT andLanierC (2004) Generativity behind bars: Some “redemptive truth” about prison society. In: St. Aubin, EMcAdams, D andKim, T (eds) The Generative Society: Caring for Future Generations.
Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association, pp.131–151.
34.
MauerMKingR andYoungM (2004) The Meaning of ‘Life’: Long Prison Sentences in Context.
Washington, DC:
The Sentencing Project.
35.
National Research Council (2014) The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences.
Washington, DC:
National Academies Press.
36.
NellisA (2010)
Throwing away the key: The expansion of life without parole sentences in the United States. Federal Sentencing Reporter23: 27–32.
37.
NellisA (2013) Life Goes On: The Historic Rise of Life Sentences in America.
Washington, DC:
The Sentencing Project.
38.
NellisA (2017) Still Life: America’s Increasing Use of Life and Long-Term Sentences.
Washington, DC:
The Sentencing Project.
39.
OrtnerS (1994) Theory in anthropology since the sixties. In: Dirks, NEley, G andOrtner, S (eds) Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, pp.372–411.
40.
PageJ (2004)
Eliminating the enemy: The import of denying prisoners access to higher education in Clinton's America. Punishment & Society6: 357–378.
41.
SorensonJ andWrinkleR (1996)
No hope for parole: Disciplinary infractions among death-sentenced and life-without-parole inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior23: 542–552.
42.
SwidlerA (1986)
Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review51: 273–286.
43.
SykesG (1958) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
44.
TochH (2000)
Altruistic activity as corrections treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology44: 270–278.
45.
TochH (2010)
“I am not now who I used to be then”: Risk assessment and the maturation of long-term prison inmates. The Prison Journal90: 4–11.
46.
Van Zyl Smit (2003) Taking Life Imprisonment Seriously.
London:
Kluwer.
47.
VaughnB (2007)
The internal narrative of desistance. British Journal of Criminology47: 390–404.
48.
WhiteW (2000)
The history of recovered people as wounded healers: The era of professionalization and specialization. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly18: 1–25.
49.
YatesJ andGillespieW (2000)
The elderly and prison policy. Journal of Aging & Social Policy11: 167–175.
50.
ZambleE (1992)
Behavior and adaptation in long-term prison inmates: Descriptive longitudinal results. Criminal Justice and Behavior19: 409–425.
