This article develops a theoretical model of `digital rule'. This is a form of at-a-distance monitoring which becomes possible with the advent of certain electronic technologies. It is argued that this form of monitoring gives rise to a related form of decision-making, and to particular forms of punishment, both directly and indirectly. The article begins with a review of Foucault's work on `discipline'. It is argued that while his general approach remains useful, his `technology of power' model requires updating, because of certain moves within many criminal justice systems away from reliance on the disciplinary techniques Foucault associates with modernity. I argue that comments by Deleuze suggest a way of developing a theoretical adjunct to Foucault's model, and this new control form I characterize as one of `digital rule'. Various emerging electronic technologies are examined, and it is shown how they operate specifically through restrictions specified in terms of time and space. The relationship between formal control, exclusion and punishment measures is considered, and it is concluded that in this emerging form of rule, these aspects continue to have a very close relationship, manifest here in a particular new way.
Ball, R.A.
and Lilly, J.R. (1986a) `A theoretical examination of home incarceration', Federal Probation50(1): 17-24.
2.
Ball, R.A.
and Lilly, J.R. (1986b) `The potential use of home incarceration for drunken drivers', Crime & Delinquency32(2): 224-247.
3.
Ball, R.A.
, Lilly, J.R. and Huff, R.C. (1988) House arrest and correctional policy: doing time at home. London: Sage.
4.
Barrett, N.
(1998) Digital crime: policing the cybernation. London: Kogan Page.
5.
Baudrillard, J.
(1983) In the shadow of the silent majorities, or, the end of the social and other essays. New York: Semiotext(e).
6.
Baudrillard, J.
(1993) Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage.
7.
Bottoms, A.E.
(1995) `The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing', in C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds) The politics of sentencing reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8.
Bottoms, A.E.
and Wiles, P. (1996) `Understanding crime prevention in late modern societies', in T. Bennett (ed.) Preventing crime and disorder: targeting strategies and responsibilities (Cropwood Series). Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
9.
Card
and Ward (1998) The Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Bristol: Jordans.
10.
Cavadino, P.
(1997) `Electronic tagging: the evidence so far', Criminal Justice15(2): 4-5.
11.
Chunn, D.
and Gavigan, S. (1988) `Social control: analytic tool or analytic quagmire?', Contemporary Crises12: 107-124.
12.
Clarke, R.V.
(1995) `Situational crime prevention', in M. Tonry and D. Farrington (eds) Building a safer society: crime and justice: a review of research, vol. 19. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Clarke, R.V.
and Homel, R. (1997) `A revised classification of situational crime prevention techniques', in S.P. Lab (ed.) Crime prevention at the crossroads. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
14.
Clowes, N.
(1993) `Electronic monitoring: the Home Office trials', in J.R. Lilly and J. Himan (eds) The electronic monitoring of offenders: symposium papers, second series. Leicester: De Montfort University Law School Monographs.
15.
Cohen, S.
(1985) Visions of social control: crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity.
16.
Davis, M.
(1992) City of quartz: excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.
17.
Deleuze, G.
(1988) Foucault. London: The Athlone Press.
18.
Deleuze, G.
(1995a) `Postscript on control societies', in G. Deleuze Negotiations: 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
Deleuze, G.
(1995b) `Control and becoming', in G. Deleuze Negotiations: 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
Deleuze, G.
(1997) `Postscript on the societies of control' [alternative translation of Deleuze, 1995a], in N. Leach (ed.) Rethinking architecture: a reader in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
21.
Deleuze, G.
and Guattari, F. (1984) Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.
22.
Deleuze, G.
and Guattari, F. (1987) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Dreyfus, H.
and Rabinow, P. (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
24.
Feeley, M.
and Simon, J. (1992) `The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications', Criminology30: 449-474.
25.
Feeley, M.
and Simon, J. (1994) `Actuarial justice: the emerging new criminal law', in D. Nelken (ed.) The futures of criminology. London: Sage.
26.
Foucault, M.
(1979) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
27.
Fyfe, N.
and Bannister, J. (1996) `City watching: closed circuit television in public spaces', Area28(1): 37-46.
28.
Garland, D.
(1985) Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Aldershot: Gower.
29.
Garland, D.
(1991) Punishment and modern society: a study in social theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30.
Garland, D.
and Young, P., eds (1983a) The power to punish. Aldershot: Gower.
31.
Garland, D.
and Young, P. (1983b) `Towards a social analysis of penality', in Garland and Young (eds) The power to punish. Aldershot: Gower.
32.
Goffman, E.
(1991) Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. London: Penguin.
33.
Grabosky, P.
, Smith, R., with Wright, P. (1998) Crime in the digital age: controlling telecommunications and cyberspace illegalities. Leichhardt, NSW: The Federation Press.
34.
Howe, A.
(1994) Punish and critique: towards a feminist analysis of penality. London: Routledge.
35.
Jones, R. (1997) `Modern penality and social theory', unpublished doctoral thesis, Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
36.
Loader, B.
, ed. (1997) The governance of cyberspace: politics, technology and global restructuring. London: Routledge.
37.
Mair, G.
and Mortimer, E. (1996) Curfew orders with electronic monitoring: an evaluation of the first twelve months of trials in Greater Manchester, Norfolk and Berkshire (Home Office Research Study 163). London: Home Office.
38.
Mair, G.
and Nec, C., with the assistance of Barclay, G. and Wickham, K. (1990) Electronic monitoring: the trials and their results (Home Office Research & Planning Unit Report, No. 120). London: HMSO.
39.
Mann, D.
and Sutton, M. (1998) `Netcrime: more change in the organization of thieving', British Journal of Criminology38(2): 201-229.
40.
Mathiesen, T.
(1965) The defences of the weak: a sociological study of a Norwegian correctional institution. London: Tavistock.
41.
Nellis, M.
(1991) `The electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales: recent developments and future prospects', British Journal of Criminology31 (2): 165-185.
42.
Norris, C.
, Moran, J. and Armstrong, G. (1998) `Algorithmic surveillance: the future of automated visual surveillance', in C. Norris, J. Moran and G. Armstrong (eds) Surveillance, closed circuit television and social control. Aldershot: Ashgate.
43.
O'Malley, P.
(1992) `Risk, power and crime prevention', Economy and Society21 (3): 252-275.
44.
O'Malley, P.
and Palmer, D. (1996) `Post-Keynesian policing', Economy and Society25(2): 137-155.
45.
Peters, A.
(1988) `Main currents in criminal law theory', in J.J.M. van Dijket al. (eds) Criminal law in action. Deventer: Kluwer.
46.
Petersilia, J.
(1986) `Exploring the option of house arrest', Federal Probation50(2): 50-54.
47.
Pollitt, C.
(1993) Managerialism and the public services: cuts or cultural change in the 1990s?, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
48.
Pollitt, C.
and Bouckaert, G., eds (1995) Quality improvement in European public services: concepts, cases and commentary. London: Sage.
49.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
(1967) Task force report: science and technology. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Prison Service
(1995a) `Briefing': incentives and privileges: new national framework, no. 83 (27 June 1995), London: Prison Service.
52.
Prison Service
(1995b) Instruction to governors: incentives and earned privileges for prisoners: national framework, IG74/1995 (6 July 1995), London: Prison Service.
53.
Renzema, M.
(1992) `Home confinement programs: development, implementation, and impact', in J.M. Byrne, A.J. Lurigio and J. Petersilia (eds) Smart sentencing: the emergence of intermediate sanctions. London: Sage.
54.
Rusche, G.
and Kirchheimer, O. (1968) Punishment and social structure. New York: Russell & Russell.
55.
Scheerer, S.
and Hess, H. (1997) `Social control: a defence and reformulation', in R. Bergalli and C. Sumner (eds) Social control and political order: European perspectives at the end of the century. London: Sage.
56.
Shearing, C.
and Stenning, P. (1986) `Say “Cheese!”: The Disney order that is not so Mickey Mouse', in C. Shearing and P. Stenning (eds) Private Policing. Beverley Hills: Sage.
57.
Sumner, C.
, ed. (1990) Censure, politics and criminal justice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
58.
Sumner, C.
(1997) `The Decline of Social Control and the Rise of Vocabularies of Struggle', in R. Bergalli and C. Sumner (eds) Social Control and Political Order. London: Sage.
59.
Sykes, G.
(1958) The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
University of Cambridge
(1999) `Use and misuse of computer facilities'. Internet URL (at time of writing) http://www.cam.ac.uk/CS//ITSyndicate/guidelines.html
61.
von Hirsch, A.
and Wasik, M. (1997) `Civil disqualifications attending conviction: a suggested conceptual framework', Cambridge Law Journal56(3): 599-626.
62.
Wasik, M.
(1990) Crime and the computer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
63.
Weber, M.
(1978) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, volume 2. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
64.
Wilkins, L.
(1964) Social deviance: social policy, action and research. London: Tavistock.
