This study explores the manifestation of meeting leadership styles through humour and laughter in Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meetings, focusing on differences across the tenures of Chairs Greenspan, Bernanke and Yellen. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of meeting transcripts from 1987 to 2017 highlight the role of humour. The study explores various functions of laughter and finds that laughter frequency and initiation of laughter differ among the chairs, reflecting their distinct leadership styles. The findings suggest that a more facilitative leadership style is marked by higher frequencies of laughter tokens. This research contributes to understanding the dynamics of meeting leadership and the strategic use of humour in professional settings.
AngouriJMarraM (2010) Corporate meetings as genre: A study of the role of the chair in corporate meeting talk. Text and Talk30(6): 615–636.
2.
AsmußBSvennevigJ (2009) Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication46(1): 3–22.
3.
AttardoS (1993) Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics19(6): 537–558.
4.
Bargiela-ChiappiniFHarrisSJ (1997) Managing Language: The Discourse of Corporate Meetings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5.
BerleECKavajeczKOnozakaY (2024) Effect of gender composition of committees. Human Relations77(5): 622–649.
6.
BodenD (1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Oxford: Polity Press.
7.
BoydstunAEWallachHYoungDG, et al (2023) The role of humor in work group dynamics in times of crisis. Small Group Research54(6): 792–833.
8.
BrownPLevinsonSC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChenQBrandtA (2021) Speakership, recipiency and the interactional space: Cases of ’next-speaker self-selects’ in multiparty university student meetings. Journal of Pragmatics180: 54–71.
10.
DjordjilovicO (2012) Displaying and developing team identity in workplace meetings – A multimodal perspective. Discourse Studies14(1): 111–127.
11.
EckertPMcConnell-GinetS (1992) Communities of practice: where language, gender and power all live. In: HallKBucholtzMMoonwomonB (eds) Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp.89–99.
12.
EckertPMcConnell-GinetS (1999) New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society28(02): 185–201.
13.
EdelskyC (1993) Who’s got the floor? In: TannenD (ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.189–227.
FordCE (2008) Women Speaking Up: Getting and Using Turns in Workplace Meetings. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
17.
GrindstedA (1997) Joking as a strategy in Spanish and Danish negotiations. In: Bargiela-ChiappiniFHarrisS (eds) The Language of Business: An International Perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp.159–182.
18.
HansenSMcMahonMPratA (2018) Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: A computational linguistics approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics133(2): 801–870.
19.
HolmesJMarraM (2002) Having a laugh at work. Journal of Pragmatics34(12): 1683–1710.
20.
HolmesJMarraMBurnsL (2001) Women’s humour in the workplace. Australian Journal of Communication28(1): 83–108.
21.
HolmesJSchnurrSMarraM (2007) Leadership and communication: Discursive evidence of a workplace culture change. Discourse & Communication1(4): 433–451.
22.
HolmesJStubbeM (2003) Power and Politeness in the Workplace. London: Pearson.
23.
KaarboJ (1997) Prime minister leadership styles in Foreign Policy Decision-making: A framework for research. Political Psychology18(3): 553–581.
24.
KuhnertKWLewisP (1987) Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management Review12(4): 648–657.
25.
KushnerM (1992) The light touch. Executive Excellence9(2): 11–12.
26.
LangerfeldCAndersenG (2023) The dynamics of turn-taking in meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee. Fachsprache 45(3-4): 187–210.
27.
LarrueJTrognonA (1993) Organization of turn-taking and mechanisms for turn-taking repairs in a chaired meeting. Journal of Pragmatics19(2): 177–196.
28.
LevinsonSC (1992) Activity types and language. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.66–100.
29.
LewinKLippittRWhiteRK (1939) Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created ’social climates. Journal of Social Psychology10(2): 269–299.
30.
MarkakiVMerlinoSMondadaL, et al (2010) Laughter in professional meetings: The organization of an emergent ethnic joke. Journal of Pragmatics42(6): 1526–1542.
31.
MirivelJCTracyK (2005) Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction38(1): 1–34.
32.
MooreRJWhalenJGathmanECH (2010) The work of the work order: Document practice in face-to-face service encounters. In: LlwellynNHindmarshJ (eds) Organisation, Interaction and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.172–197.
33.
MunalimLGenuinoC (2021) Chair-like turn-taking features in a faculty meeting: evidence of local conditions and collegiality. International Journal of Linguistics15(1): 43–64.
34.
MurataK (2014) An empirical cross-cultural study of humour in business meetings in New Zealand and Japan. Journal of Pragmatics60: 251–265.
35.
NorrickNR (2003) Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics35(9): 1333–1359.
36.
OittinenTPiirainen-MarshA (2015) Openings in technology-mediated business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics85: 47–66.
37.
PettersenIJSolstadE (2023) From relationship orientation to task orientation: On the digitalization of clinical leaders. Financial Accountability and Management39(1): 151–166.
38.
PomerantzADenvirP (2007) Enacting the institutional role of chair-person in upper management meetings: The interactional realization of provisional authority. In: CoorenF (ed.) Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.31–52.
39.
PutnamLFairhurstGT (2001) Discourse analysis in organizations. Issues and concerns. In: JablinFPutnamL (eds) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.78–136.
40.
RedlbacherFHattkeF (2024) How virtual meetings stimulate process innovations in organisations: Mixed-methods evidence from emergency response providers. Innovation26(1): 1–22.
41.
RobertHMHonemannDHBalchTJ, et al (2020) Robert’s Rules of Order. Newly Revised. New York: PublicAffairs.
42.
Rogerson-RevellP (2007) Humour in business: A double-edged sword. Journal of Pragmatics39(1): 4–28.
43.
SchwartzmanHB (1989) The Meeting: Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York: Plenum Press.
44.
SvennevigJ (2012) Interaction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies14(1): 3–10.
45.
TannenD (1994) Interpreting interruption in conversation. In: TannenD (ed.) Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.53–83.
46.
TaylorJR (2006) Coorientation: A conceptual framework. In: CoorenFTaylorJRVan EvryEJ (eds) Communication as Organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Explorations in the Dynamic of Text and Conversation. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.141–156.
47.
VögeM (2010) Local identity processes in business meetings displayed through laughter in complaint sequences. Journal of Pragmatics42(6): 1556–1576.
48.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
