In this study, I apply the notions of chronotopes and scales to analyze how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US politician and activist, constructs a relatable persona in her Instagram stories. I focus on two strategies that she deploys: the mixing of chronotopes associated with different scales of formality/publicness within the same story, and the use of downscaling strategies to reduce the formality of public chronotopes. More specifically, I analyze her alternation in the same story of images evoking chronotopes related to different domains of her life which can be placed on divergent scales on the public/private and formal/informal continuum. I also show how she uses downscaling strategies such as introducing her dog within chronotopes related to her role as a politician, establishing interpersonal connections, or talking about personal issues to reduce the distance between herself as a politician and her followers. This article thus contributes both to the study of the relationships between chronotopes and scales and to the analysis of communication strategies by politicians.
AdamSMaierM (2010) Personalisation of politics: A critical review and agenda for research. In: SalmonC (ed.) Communication Yearbook 34. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.214–257.
3.
AghaA (2007) Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication27(3): 320–335.
4.
Al NashmiE (2017) From selfies to media events: How Instagram users interrupted their routines after the Charlie Hebdo shootings. Digital Journalism6(1): 98–117.
5.
BakhtinM (1981) Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In: Holquist M (ed.) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, pp.84–258.
6.
BastJ (2021) Politicians, parties, and government representatives on Instagram: A review on research approaches, usage patterns, and effects. Review of Communication Research9: 193.
7.
BlommaertJ (2015) Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology44(1): 105–116.
8.
BlommaertJDe FinaA (2017) Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are. In: De FinaAIkizogluDWegnerJ (eds) Diversity and Superdiversity. Sociocultural Linguistic Perspectives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp.1–15.
CarrESLempertM (2016) Introduction: Pragmatics of scale. In: CarrESLempertM (eds) Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp.1–24.
De FinaA (2021) Doing narrative analysis from a narratives as practices perspective. Narrative Inquiry31(1): 49–71.
13.
De FinaA (2022) “I especially loved the little Nana dancing on the balcony”: The emergence, formation, and circulation of chronotopes in mass-mediated communication. Language in Society52(4): 669–689.
14.
De FinaAKohJ (2024) Vlogger, storyteller or character? Chronotopic identity shifts and multimodal resources in COVID-19 vlogs. Discourse, Context and Media59: 100788.
15.
De FinaAPerrinoS (2020) Chronotopic identities and chronotopic relations. Language & Communication70: 67–70.
16.
Del ValleG (2024) The Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez you don’t know. The New York Times, 5May.
17.
EldinAK (2016) Instagram’s role in influencing youth opinion in the 2015 election campaign in Bahrain. European Scientific Journal12: 245–257.
18.
FrobeniusM (2014) Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers. Journal of Pragmatics72: 59–72.
19.
GalS (2002) A semiotics of the public/private distinction. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies13(1): 77–95.
20.
GalS (2016) Scale-making: Comparison and perspective as ideological projects. In: CarrESLempertM (eds) Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp.91–111.
21.
GalSWoolardK (2001) Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority. Machester UK & Northampton, MA: St. Jerome.
22.
GoffmanE (1979) Footing. Semiotica25(1–2): 1–30.
23.
GrusellMNordL (2023) Not so intimate Instagram: Images of Swedish political party leaders in the 2018 National Election Campaign. Journal of Political Marketing22: 92–107.
24.
HeidTSchneiderB (2019) The sociolinguistics of late modern publics. Journal of Sociolinguistics23(5): 435–499.
25.
HineC (2015) Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
26.
HortonDWohlRR (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19: 215–229.
27.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
KarimzadFCatedralL (2022) Chronotopic resolution, embodied subjectivity, and collective learning: A sociolinguistic theory of survival. Language, Culture & Society4(2): 189–217.
30.
KreissDLawrenceRGMcGregorSC (2018) In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. Political Communication35: 8–31.
31.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2021) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 3rd edn.New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
LalancetteMRaynauldV (2019) The power of political image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist63: 888–924.
33.
LarssonAO (2019) Skiing all the way to the polls: Exploring the popularity of personalized posts on political Instagram accounts. Convergence25(5–6): 1096–1110.
34.
LempertMSilversteinM (2012) Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency. Bllomingdale, IN: Indiana University Press.
35.
LiebhartKBernhardtP (2017) Political storytelling on Instagram: Key aspects of Alexander Van der Bellen’s successful 2016 presidential election campaign. Media Communication5: 15–25.
36.
LustigABrookesGHuntD (2021) Social semiotics of gangstalking evidence videos on YouTube: Multimodal discourse analysis of a novel persecutory belief system. JMIR Mental Health8(10): e30311.
37.
MaaresPBanjacSHanuschF (2021) The labour of visual authenticity on social media: Exploring producers’ and audiences’ perceptions on Instagram. Poetics84: 101502.
38.
McAllisterI (2007) The personalization of politics. In: DaltonRJKlingemannHD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.571–588.
39.
McGregorSC (2018) Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self- personalization on vote intention. New Media & Society20(3): 1139–1160.
40.
MuñozCLTownerTL (2017) The image is the message: Instagram marketing and the 2016 presidential primary season. Journal of Political Marketing16(3–4): 290–318.
41.
O’ConnellBHO’SheaDGallagherS (2015) Enhancing social relationships through positive psychology activities: A randomised controlled trial. The Journal of Positive Psychology11(2): 1–14.
42.
ParmeleeJHPerkinsSCBeasleyB (2022) Personalization of politicians on Instagram: What Generation Z wants to see in political posts. Information, Communication & Society26(1): 1773–1788.
43.
PengI (2021) What makes politicians’ Instagram posts popular? Analyzing social media strategies of candidates and office holders with computer vision. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 143–166.
44.
PersML (2022) Narrating (m)others’ lives – a small stories analysis of how mummy vloggers narrate their lives in YouTube vlogs. PhD Thesis, King’s CollegeLondon, UK.
45.
PinedaABellido-PérezEBarragán-RomeroAI (2022) “Backstage moments during the campaign”: The interactive use of Instagram by Spanish political leaders. New Media & Society24: 1133–1160.
46.
PittmanMReichB (2016) Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior62: 155–167.
47.
PritzkerSPerrinoS (2021) Culture inside: Scale, intimacy, and chronotopic stance in situated narratives. Language and Society50: 365–387.
48.
RossS (2019) Being real on fake Instagram: Likes, images, and media ideologies of value. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology29(3): 359–374.
49.
Shane-SimpsonCManagoAGaggiN, et al (2018) Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications forsocial capital. Computers in Human Behavior86: 276–288.
SilversteinM (2006) How we look from where we stand. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology16: 269–278.
52.
SilversteinM (2011) What goes around . . . : some shtick from “tricky dick” and the circulation of U.S. presidential image. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology21(1): 54–77.
53.
SilversteinM (2016) Semiotic vinification and the scaling of taste. In: Summerson CarrELempertM (eds) Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp.185–212.
54.
Simões MarquesIKovenM (2019) “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!” French Luso-descendants’ diasporic Facebook conarrations of vacation return trips to Portugal. International Journal of Bilingualism23(1): 57–75.
Van AelstPSheaferTStanyerJ (2012) The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 203–220.
57.
VergeerMHermansLSamsS (2011) Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics19(3): 477–501.
58.
WangXKroonS (2020) Chronotopes and heritage authenticity: The case of the Tujia in China. In: KroonSSwanenbergJ (eds) Chronotopic Identity Work: Sociolinguistic Analyses of Cultural and Linguistic Phenomena in Time and Space. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp.105–127.
WoolardKA (2013) Is the personal political? Chronotopes and changing stances toward catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism16(2): 210–224.
62.
ZappavignaM (2016) Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication15(3): 271–292.
