Alliances between families and children’s institutional caregivers are considered crucial in granting children a healthy upbringing. This article reports the preliminary findings of a study on the interactional construction of epistemic and deontic alliances among present and evoked children’s caregivers. Adopting a discourse analysis approach to a corpus of 54 video-recorded pediatric visits, we analyze examples of complaint sequences where parents ‘ventriloquize’ the teachers’ voices and pursue an alliance with the pediatrician against the school’s practices or stance. We illustrate the local ratification of the pediatrician’s deontic authority over the teacher’s and the interactional accomplishment of (dis)alliances among the institutionally sanctioned caregivers. In the conclusion, we argue that this local system of deontic and epistemic (dis)alliances indexes the contemporary shift toward an individualized (or individualistic?) model of care and education, deaf to the collective demands and the need for relatively routinized practices that are at stake in any community.
BarnesRK (2019) Conversation analysis of communication in medical care: Description and beyond. Research on Language and Social Interaction52(3): 300–315.
2.
BronfenbrennerU (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
CaroniaL (2022) Reported speech in problem telling: Doing epistemic and moral work in parent–teacher conferences. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice16(2): 135–159.
4.
CaroniaL (2023) Epistemic and deontic authority in parent–teacher conference: Referring to the expert as a discursive practice to (jointly) undermine the teacher’s expertise. Journal of Teacher Education.
5.
CaroniaLRanzaniF (2023) Epistemic trust as an interactional accomplishment in pediatric well-child visits: Parents’ resistance to solicited advice as performing epistemic vigilance. Health Communication Epub ahead of print 26 March 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2189504.
6.
CaroniaLVandiniCD (2019) Assessing a (gifted) child in parent-teacher conference: Participants’ resources to pursue (and resist) a no-problem trajectory. Language and Dialogue9(1): 125–148.
7.
ChristodoulidouM (2010) Complaints about misbehaviour. Journal of Greek Linguistics10(2): 295–316.
8.
CinoDGigliADemozziS (2021) “That’s the only place where you can get this information today!”. An exploratory study on parenting WhatsApp groups with a sample of Italian parents. Studi sulla Formazione/Open Journal of Education24(1): 75–96.
9.
ClarkHHGerrigRJ (1990) Quotations as demonstrations. Language66(4): 764–805.
10.
CliftR (2007) Getting there first: Non-narrative reported speech in interaction. In: HoltECliftR (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.120–149.
11.
CollinsHEvansR (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
ConwayJJohnsonBEdgman-LevitanS, et al (2006) Partnering With Patients and Families to Design a Patient-and Family-Centered Health Care System: A Roadmap for the Future: A Work in Progress. Bethesda, MD: Institute for Family-Centered Care.
13.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
14.
Couper-KuhlenE (2007) Assessing and accounting. In: HoltECliftC (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.81–119.
15.
Couper-KuhlenE (2012) Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In: SorjonenMLPeräkyläA (eds) Emotion in Interaction. New York City, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.113–146.
16.
de HaesH (2006) Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: A case for vulnerability. Patient Education and Counseling62(3): 291–298.
17.
DemozziSGigliACinoD (2020a) I media digitali come strumenti per esercitare e performare la genitorialità (parte 1): Literature review e presentazione della ricerca. Rivista Italiana di Educazione Familiare – Italian Journal of Family Education15(2): 79–92.
18.
DemozziSGigliACinoD (2020b) I media digitali come strumenti per “esercitare e performare” la genitorialità (parte 2): analisi e discussione dei risultati. Rivista Italiana di Educazione Familiare – Italian Journal of Family Education15(2): 93–111.
19.
DrewP (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction31(3-4): 295–325.
20.
DrewPHeritageJ (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DrewPWalkerT (2009) Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics41(12): 2400–2414.
22.
EdwardsD (2005) Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies7(1): 5–29.
23.
EpsteinJL (2001) School, Family and Community Partnerships. Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
24.
FasuloAPontecorvoC (1999) Come Si Dice? Linguaggio e Apprendimento in Famiglia e a Scuola. Roma: Carocci.
25.
FeoRLeCouteurA (2017) Dealing with third-party complaints on a men’s relationship-counselling helpline. Discourse Studies19(2): 131–147.
26.
GalatoloR (2015) Reporting talk when testifying: Intertextuality, consistency, and transformation in witnesses’ use of reported speech. In: DepretLLynchMBerardT (eds) Law at Work: Studies in Legal Ethnomethods. New York City: Oxford University Press, pp.139–162.
27.
GigliA (2019) Information and communication technologies in school-family communication and parental involvement in children’s schooling: Data from a research. Pedagogia più Didattica5(2): 1–8.
28.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
GoodJS (2015) Reported and enacted actions: Moving beyond reported speech and related concepts. Discourse Studies17(6): 663–681.
30.
GoodwinC (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633.
31.
GrafEMSpranz-FogasyTSatorM (2014) Discourses of Helping Professions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
32.
HeritageJ (1984a) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. London: Polity Press.
33.
HeritageJ (1984b) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: AtkinsonJHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.299–345.
HeritageJ (2011) Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In: StiversTMondadaLSteensingJ (eds) The Morality of Knowledge in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.159–183.
36.
HeritageJRaymondG (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68(1): 15–38.
37.
HeritageJRaymondG (2006) The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society35(05): 677–705.
38.
HeritageJRaymondG (2012) Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In: de RuiterJP (ed.) Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.179–192.
39.
HeritageJRobinsonJD (2006) Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In: HeritageJMaynardDW (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.45–85.
40.
HoltE (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction29(3): 219–245.
41.
HoltE (1999) Just gassing: An analysis of direct reported speech in a conversation between two employees of a gas supply company. Text & Talk19(4): 505–537.
42.
HoltE (2000) Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on Language and Social Interaction33(4): 425–454.
43.
HoltE (2007) I’m eyeing your chop on mind: reporting and enacting. In: HoltECliftR (eds) Reporting on Talk. Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.47–80.
44.
HoltECliftR (2007) Reporting on Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
HornbyG (2011) Parental Involvement in Childhood Education: Building Effective School-Family Partnerships. Berlin: Springer.
46.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis. Studies From the First Generation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin, pp.13–31.
47.
JohnsonBH (2000) Family-centered care: Four decades of progress. Families Systems & Health18(2): 137–156.
48.
JonesJM, et al (2013) Family, school, and community partnerships. In: ShribergDRadliffKHalsellMA (eds) School Psychology and Social Justice: Conceptual Foundations and Tools for Practice. Milton Park, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, pp.270–293.
49.
Knorr CetinaK (2007) Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews32(4): 361–375.
50.
LabovW (1972) The study of language in its social context. In: PrideJBHolmesJ (eds) Sociolinguistics. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books, pp.180–202.
51.
LamerichsJTe MolderHFM (2009) ‘And then I’m really like . . .’: ‘preliminary’ self-quotations in adolescent talk. Discourse Studies11(4): 401–419.
52.
LareauA (1987) Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education60(2): 73–85.
53.
LindströmASorjonenML (2013) Affiliation in conversation. In: SidnellJStiversT (eds) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp.350–369.
54.
LucyJA (ed.) (1993) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
MayesP (1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language14(2): 325–363.
56.
MillerKIConsidineJR (2009) Communication in the helping professions. In: FreyLCissnaK (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research. Milton Park: Routledge, pp.405–428.
57.
MuntiglPHorvathAO (2014) The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation. Psychotherapy Research24(3): 327–345.
58.
OchsE (1994) Stories that step into the future. In: BiberDFineganE (eds) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.106–135.
59.
PinoM (2015) Responses to indirect complaints as restricted activities in therapeutic community meetings. In: ChevalierFHGMooreJ (eds) Producing and Managing Restricted Activities: Avoidance and Withholding in Institutional Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.271–304.
60.
PinoMMortariL (2014) Beyond neutrality: Professionals’ responses to clients’ indirect complaints in a therapeutic community for people with a diagnosis of mental illness. Communication & Medicine10(3): 213–224.
61.
PomerantzA (1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9: 219–229.
62.
RaeJKerbyJ (2007) Designing contexts for reporting tactical talk. In: HoltECliftR (eds) Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.179–194.
63.
RobinsonJDHeritageJ (2014) Intervening with conversation analysis: The case of medicine. Research on Language and Social Interaction47(3): 201–218.
64.
RuusuvuoriJLindforsP (2009) Complaining about previous treatment in health care settings. Journal of Pragmatics41(12): 2415–2434.
65.
SacksHSchegloffEAJeffersonG (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language50(4): 696–735.
66.
SchegloffEA (1998) Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech41(3-4): 235–263.
67.
SidnellJStiversT (eds) (2013) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
68.
StiversT (2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57.
69.
TannenD (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
WeiningerEBLareauA (2003) Translating Bourdieu into the American context: The question of social class and family-school relations. Poetics31(5-6): 375–402.
