Research on medical interactions shows how the discursive construction of the clinical case impacts diagnostic reasoning and treatment recommendations. Drawing on an ethnographic study in an intensive care unit, we illustrate how this process is at play in a ward that adopts an extreme, guideline-divergent policy as to the use of antibiotics. The article focuses on how physicians assemble the case as ‘treatable’ or ‘not yet treatable’, and how in doing so they ‘talk into being’ two contrastive policies on antibiotics and position themselves toward the one adopted in the ward. The analysis identifies the discursive resources displayed by physicians to both project an infectious disease diagnosis and resist this treatment-implicative trajectory. We argue that the physicians’ contentious discursive construction of the case has crucial consequences in the way the ward’s extreme policy is jointly accomplished as a highly reflexive process sensitive to the contingencies of any particular case.
AlbyFZucchermaglioCBaruzzoM (2015) Diagnostic decision making in oncology: Creating shared knowledge and managing complexity. Mind, Culture and Activity22(1): 4–22.
2.
American Thoracic Society and Infectious Disease Society of America (2005) Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine171: 388–416.
3.
AnspachRR (1988) Notes on the sociology of medical discourse: The language of case presentation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior29(4): 357–375.
4.
AntakiCBarnesRLeudarI (2005) Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies7(6): 627–647.
5.
AtkinsonP (1995) Medical Talk and Medical Work: The Liturgy of the Clinic. London: SAGE.
6.
AtkinsonP (1999) Medical discourse, evidentiality and the construction of professional responsibility. In: SarangiSRobertsC (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 75–108.
7.
BoldenGB (2009) Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics41(5): 974–998.
8.
Brookes-HowellLC (2006) Living without labels: The interactional management of diagnostic uncertainty in the genetic counselling clinic. Social Science & Medicine63(12): 3080–3091.
9.
BrownP (1995) Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior36: 34–52.
10.
ByrnePSLongBE (1976) Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviours of Doctors in the Consultation. London: HMSO.
11.
CaroniaL (2015) Totem and taboo: The embarrassing epistemic work of things in the research setting. Qualitative Research15(2): 141–165.
12.
CaroniaLChieregatoA (2016) Polyphony in a ward: Tracking professional theories in members’ dialogues. Language and Dialogue6(3): 396–422.
13.
CastelP (2009) What’s behind a guideline? Authority, competition and collaboration in the French oncology sector. Social Studies of Science39(5): 743–764.
14.
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy (CDDEP) (2015) State of the World’s Antibiotics, 2015. Washington, DC: CDDEP.
15.
CicourelA (1985) Text and discourse. Annual Review of Anthropology14: 159–185.
16.
CicourelA (1987) Cognitive and organizational aspects of medical diagnostic reasoning. Discourse Processes10: 346–367.
17.
CoorenF (2010) Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation, and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
18.
DuboisJ (2007) The stance triangle. In: EnglebretsonR (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–182.
19.
DurantiA (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
DurantiA (2015) The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
EggimannPPittetD (2001) Critical care reviews: Infection control in the ICU. Chest120(6): 2059–2093.
22.
EricksonF (1999) Local identities and presentation of self as a fellow physician: Aspects of a discourse of apprenticeship in medicine. In: SarangiSRobertsC (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 109–143.
23.
GalatoloRMarguttiP (2016) Territories of knowledge, professional identities and patients’ participation in specialized visits with a team of practitioners. Patient Education and Counseling99(6): 888–896.
24.
GarfinkelH (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
GlennPKoshmannT (2005) Learning to diagnose: Production of diagnostic hypotheses in problem-based learning tutorials. In: Felson DuchanJKovarskyD (eds) Diagnosis as Cultural Practice. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 153–178.
26.
GoodB (1994) Medicine, Rationality, and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GoodwinC (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist96(3): 606–633.
28.
GoodwinC (2003) The body in action. In: CouplandJGwynR (eds) Discourse, the Body and Identity. New York: Macmillan, pp. 19–42.
29.
GoodwinCGoodwinMH (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. Papers on Pragmatics1: 1–55.
30.
HalvorsenK (2010) Team decision making in the workplace: A systematic review of discourse analytic studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice7(3): 273–296.
31.
HalvorsenKSarangiS (2015) Team decision-making in workplace meetings: The interplay of activity roles and discourse roles. Journal of Pragmatics76: 1–14.
32.
HeathC (1992) The delivery and reception of diagnosis and assessment in general practice consultation. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–267.
33.
HeathC (2006) Body work: The collaborative production of the clinical object. In: HeritageJMaynardDW (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–213.
34.
HeritageJ (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HeritageJ (1997) Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In: SilvermanD (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: SAGE, pp. 222–245.
36.
HeritageJ (2006) Revisiting authority in physician-patient interaction. In: MaxwellMKovarskyDDuchanJ (eds) Diagnosis as Cultural Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 83–102.
37.
HeritageJ (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29.
38.
HeritageJ (2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 30–52.
39.
HeritageJMaynardDW (2006) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HeritageJRaymondG (2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68(1): 15–38.
41.
HeritageJRobinsonJD (2006) Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In: HeritageJMaynardDW (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–85.
42.
HindmarshJHylandLBanerjeeA (2014) Work to make simulation work: ‘Realism’, instructional correction and the body in training. Discourse Studies16(2): 247–269.
43.
HobbsP (2003) The use of evidentiality in physicians’ progress notes. Discourse Studies5: 451–478.
44.
HranjecTRosenbergerLHSwensonB. (2012) Aggressive versus conservative initiation of antimicrobial treatment in critically ill surgical patients with suspected intensive-care-unit-acquired infection: A quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases12(10): 774–780.
45.
IkedaNOkadaM (2007) Doctors’ practical management of knowledge in the daily case conference. In: HesterSFrancisD (eds) Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 69–89.
46.
JeffersonG (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: LernerGH (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–23.
47.
KoschmannTLeBaronCGoodwinC. (2011) Can you see the cystic artery yet? A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics43(2): 521–541.
48.
KovarskyDSnellingLKMeyeE (2005) Emotion and objectivity in medical diagnosis. In: Felson DuchanJKovarskyD (eds) Diagnosis as Cultural Practice. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 179–200.
49.
LindwallOLymerG (2011) Uses of ‘understand’ in science education. Journal of Pragmatics43(2): 452–474.
50.
LymerGIvarssonJRystedtH. (2014) Situated abstraction: From the particular to the general in second-order diagnostic work. Discourse Studies16(2): 185–215.
51.
MåseideP (2007) Discourses of collaborative medical work. Text & Talk27(5–6): 611–632.
52.
MaynardDW (1992) On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In: DrewPHeritageJ (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 331–358.
53.
MaynardDW (2003) Bad News Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
MondadaL (2007) Operating together through videoconference: Members’ procedures for accomplishing a common space of action. In: HesterSFrancisD (eds) Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge. Aldreshot: Ashgate, pp. 51–67.
55.
MondadaL (2014) Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies16(2): 131–161.
56.
O’GradyCDahmMRRogerP. (2014) Trust, talk and the dictaphone: Tracing the discursive accomplishment of trust in a surgical consultation. Discourse & Society25(1): 65–83.
57.
PomerantzA (1980) Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry50: 186–198.
58.
ReesCEMonrouxeLV (2008) ‘Is it alright if I-um-we unbutton your pyjama top now?’ Pronominal use in bedside teaching encounters. Communication and Medicine5(2): 171–182.
59.
StiversT (2002a) Participating in decisions about treatment: Overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters. Social Science & Medicine54: 1111–1130.
60.
StiversT (2002b) ‘Symptoms only’ and ‘candidate diagnoses’: Presenting the problem in pediatric encounters. Health Communication14(3): 299–338.
61.
StiversT (2005) Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: Delivery formats and implications for parent resistance. Social Science & Medicine60: 946–964.
62.
StiversT (2006) Treatment decisions: Negotiations between doctors and patients in acute care encounters. In: HeritageJMaynardDW (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–312.
63.
StiversT (2007) Prescribing under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
StiversT (2008) Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(1): 31–57.
65.
Ten HaveP (1995) Medical ethnomethodology: An overview. Human Studies18(2–3): 245–261.
66.
TimmermansSAngellA (2001) Evidence-based medicine, clinical uncertainty, and learning to doctor. Journal of Health and Social Behavior42(4): 342–359.
67.
World Health Organization (2014) Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization.
68.
YoungPJSaxenaM (2014) Fever management in intensive care patients with infections. Critical Care18: 206–214.
69.
ZemelAKoschmannT (2014) ‘Put your fingers right in here’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies16(2): 163–183.
