Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse: Justified reframing as a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion

Abstract

This article seeks to extend existing models of argumentation by considering an important dimension of real-life argumentative discourse: how complex argumentative discussions evolve over time. We define a complex argumentative discussion as a multi-issue discussion, in which the different issues are interrelated in the form of a hierarchy. We claim that justified reframing might be used to transform a single-issue argumentative discussion into a complex argumentative discussion. To illustrate this, we examine the Facebook discourse of the Rhodes Must Fall movement in South Africa. We analyse how reframing is justified by means of arguments, allowing the protagonists to claim as legitimate their reframing of a single issue into a complex argumentative discussion. Our findings complement existing sociological research on social movements by highlighting how their goals are achieved by means of argumentative discourse.

Keywords

Argumentation complex argumentative discussion Facebook issue justified reframing reframing Rhodes Must Fall movement South Africa temporal development of discussions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.

Dewulf

Gray

Putnam

et al . (2009) Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations 62: 155–193.

Greco

(2016) Framing and reframing in dispute mediation. In: Danesi

Greco

(eds) Case Studies in Discourse Analysis. Munich: Lincom, pp. 353–379.

Jacquin

(2014) Débattre, l’argumentation et l’identité au coeur d’une pratique verbale. Bruxelles: De Boeck.

Greco

Morasso S

(2011) Argumentation in Dispute Mediation: A Reasonable Way to Handle Conflict. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kaufer

Carley

(1993) Condensation symbols: Their variety and rhetorical function in political discourse. Philosophy and Rhetoric 26(3): 201–226.

Kjeldsen

(2012) Pictorial argumentation in advertising: Visual tropes and figures as a way of creating visual argumentation. In: van Eemeren

Garssen

(eds) Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies. New York: Springer, pp. 239–255.

Levin

(2005) Framing peace policies: The competition for resonant themes. Political Communication 22(1): 83–108.

Lewiński

Aakhus

(2014) Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry. Argumentation 28(2): 161–185.

10.

Lewiński

Mohammed

(2012) Deliberate design or unintended consequences: The argumentative uses of Facebook during the Arab Spring. Journal of Public Deliberation 8(1): 11.

11.

Lewiński

Mohammed

(2015) Tweeting the Arab Spring: Argumentative polylogues in digital media. In: Palczewski

(ed.) Disturbing Argument: Selected Works from the 18Th NCA/AFA Alta Conference on Argumentation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 291–297.

12.

Machin

Abousnnouga

(2013) The Language of War Monuments. London: Bloomsbury.

13.

Mackey

(2016) Harvard Law School wants to remove slaveholder’s crest from logo. The Intercept, 8 March. Available at: https://theintercept.com/2016/03/07/harvard-law-school-wants-to-remove-slaveholders-crest-from-logo/ (accessed 2 January 2018).

14.

Maldonado-Torres

(2007) On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies 21(2): 240–270.

15.

Palmieri

Mazzali-Lurati

(2016) Multiple audiences as text stakeholders: A conceptual framework for analyzing complex rhetorical situations. Argumentation 30(4): 467–499.

16.

Plantin

(2005) L’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

17.

Pollaroli

Rocci

(2015) The argumentative relevance of pictorial and multimodal metaphor in advertising. Journal of Argumentation in Context 4(2): 158–200.

18.

Putnam

(2004) Transformation as a critical moment in negotiations. Negotiation Journal 20(2): 275–295.

19.

Putnam

Powers

(2015) Developing negotiation competencies. In: Hannawa

Spitzberg

(eds) Handbooks of Communication Science: Communication Competence. Berlin; Bostan, MA: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 367–396.

20.

Rigotti

(2008) Locus a causa finali. L’analisi Linguistica E Letteraria 16(2): 559–576.

21.

Rigotti

Greco

Morasso S

(2010) Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes: The procedural and material components. Argumentation 24(4): 489–512.

22.

Sapir

(1934) Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences ‘Symbolism’. New York: Macmillan.

23.

Smith

(2015) Students’ attack on Cecil Rhodes statue leads to soul searching in South Africa. The Guardian, 20 March. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/20/students-attack-cecil-john-rhodes-statue-south-africa-university-cape-down-questions-race (accessed 2 January 2018).

24.

Snow

Rochford

Jr Worden

et al . (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 52(4): 464–481.

25.

Tredennick

Forster

(eds) (1960) Aristotle Posterior Analytics Topica. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.

26.

Tsarouhas

(2011) Frame extension, trade union identities, and wage politics: Evidence from Sweden. Social Politics 18(3): 419–440.

27.

Van Eemeren

(2010) Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

28.

Van Eemeren

(2014) Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.

29.

Van Eemeren

Garssen

(2009) The fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency 1(1): 23–42.

30.

Van Eemeren

Grootendorst

(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: CUP.

31.

Van Eemeren

Henkemans

AFS

(2017) Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.

32.

Van Eemeren

Grootendorst

Henkemans

AFS

(2002) Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah, NJ; London: Erlbaum.

33.

Zarefsky

(2014) Public Speaking: Strategies for Success. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

34.

Zille

(2012) The road to reconciliation. Democratic Alliance. Available at: https://www.da.org.za/archive/the-road-to-reconciliation (accessed 2 January 2018).