Focusing on the multi-dimensionality of interactional settings, this study analyzes how the material world is a significant factor in the sequential co-production of the video-taped doctor—patient interactions. The analysis shows how a material artifact, the patient's file, is relevant in two ways: a) as a device which is employed in the sequential organization of the interaction. The patient's file is being used in the contexts of topic development and topic change. b) The file with its specific physical and symbolic features is being co-produced and contested by both actors as a knowledge reservoir. Further inspection of the interactions in concert with theoretical reflections of the role of space and materiality suggests that interactions should be interpreted as happening in spatially arranged constellations of material objects and actors. In these both rigid and flexible constellations boundaries are established, access is distributed, and meaning is solidified.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Button, G. and Casey, N. (1984) `Generating Topic: The Use of Topic Initial Elicitors' , in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 167-90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Costall, A. (1995) `Socializing Affordances', Theory & Psychology5(4): 467-81.
4.
Frers, L. (2006) `Pacification by Design: An Ethnography of Normalization Techniques', in H. Berking et al. (eds) Negotiating Urban Conflicts: Interaction, Space and Control, pp. 245-58. Bielefeld: transcript.
5.
Frers, L. (2007) `Perception, Aesthetics, and Envelopment: Encountering Space and Materiality', in L. Frers and L. Meier (eds) Encountering Urban Places: Visual and Material Performances in the City, pp. 25-45. Aldershot : Ashgate.
6.
Gibson, E.J. and Walker, A.S. (1984) `Development of Knowledge of Visual-Tactual Affordances of Substance', Child Development55(2): 453-60.
7.
Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Goodwin, C. (1984) `Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 225-46. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10.
Goodwin, C. (2000a) `Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction' , Journal of Pragmatics32: 1489-522.
11.
Goodwin, C. (2000b) `Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach', in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis , pp. 157-82. London: SAGE.
12.
Heath, C. and Hindmarsh, J. (2002) `Analysing Interaction: Video, Ethnography and Situated Conduct', in T. May (ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 99-121. London : SAGE.
13.
Heritage, J. and Maynard, D.W. (2006) `Introduction: Analyzing Interaction Between Doctors and Patients in Primary Care Encounters', in J. Heritage and D.W. Maynard (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, pp. 1-21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Hutchins, E. and Palen, L. (1997) `Constructing Meaning from Space, Gesture and Speech' , in Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition , pp. 23-40. Berlin: Springer.
15.
Jefferson, G. (1984) `On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis , pp. 191-222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Khaldûn, I., Rosenthal, F., Dawood, N.J. and Lawrence, B.B. (2005) The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
20.
Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford : Blackwell.
21.
Maynard, D.W. (1997) `The News Delivery Sequence: Bad News and Good News', Research on Language and Social Interaction30: 93-130.
22.
Maynard, D.W. (2003) Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24.
Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency & Science . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Schegloff, E.A. (1984) `On Some Gesture's Relation to Talk', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 266-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Stivers, T. (2006) `Treatment Decisions: Negotiations between Doctors and Patients in Acute Care', in J. Heritage and D.W. Maynard (eds) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, pp. 279-312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Thrift, N. and Dewsbury, J.-D. (2000) `Dead Geographies: And How to Make Them Live', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18(4): 411-23.
