This article explores the use of epistemic stance strategies in journalistic discourse in English and Spanish. The linguistic resources of epistemic stance include evidential and modal expressions, as well as verbs of cognitive attitude and expressions of factivity. This article examines the pattern of distribution of epistemic stance expressions in three types of journalistic genres in English and Spanish and the presence of multifunctionality of some evidential expressions in the two languages. The article aims to reveal possible similarities or differences in the use of the stance resources in the various genres and across languages.
AikhenvaldA (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AikhenvaldA (2007) Information source and evidentiality: What can we conclude?Rivista di Linguistica19(1): 209–227.
3.
AndersonL (1986) Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In: ChafeWNicholsJ (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 273–312.
4.
BiberDJohanssonSLeechG. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
5.
BoyeK (2012) Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
BucholtzMHallK (2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614.
7.
BybeeJPerkinsRPagliucaW (1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CapelliG (2007) ‘I Reckon I Know How Leonardo da Vinci Must Have Felt’. Epistemicity, Evidentiality and English Verbs of Cognitive Attitude. Pari: Pari Publishing.
9.
ChafeW (1986) Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In: ChafeWNicholsJ (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. New York: Ablex, pp. 261–272.
10.
De HaanF (2009) On the nature of epistemic must. In: FacchinettiRTsangalidisA (eds.), Studies on English Modality 3, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 261–284.
11.
DiewaldGSmirnovaE (2010) Evidentiality in German: Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12.
HennemannA (2012) The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude. Folia Linguistica46(1): 133–170.
13.
LampertG (2011) Seem: Evidential, epistemic, or what else? A study in cognitive semantics. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics2(1): 1–24.
14.
LampertGLampertM (2010) Where does evidentiality reside? Notes on (alleged) limiting cases: Seem and be like. STUF – Language Typology and Universals63(4): 308–321.
15.
LangackerRW (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
LangackerRW (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
LangackerRW (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18.
LangackerRW (2013) Modals: Striving for control. In: Marín-ArreseJCarreteroMArúsJ. (eds) English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–55.
19.
Marín-ArreseJ (2006) Epistemic stance and commitment in the discourse of fact and opinion in English and Spanish: A comparable corpus study. In: HorneroAMLuzónMJMurilloS (eds) Corpus Linguistics: Applications for the Study of English. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 141–157.
20.
Marín-ArreseJ (2009) Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity/intersubjectivity in political discourse: A case study. In: TsangalidisAFacchinettiR (eds) Studies on English Modality. In Honour of Frank R. Palmer. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 23–52.
21.
Marín-ArreseJ (2011a) Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse: Legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility. In: HartC (ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 193–223.
22.
Marín-ArreseJ (2011b) Epistemic legitimising strategies, commitment and accountability in discourse. Discourse Studies13(6): 789–797.
23.
NuytsJ (2012) Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction5(1): 53–76.
24.
SweetserE (1982) Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society8: 484–507.
25.
TalmyL (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science12: 40–100.
26.
TraugottEC (1995) Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In: SteinDWrightS (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–54.
27.
TraugottECDasherRB (2002) Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Van der AuweraJPlungianV (1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1): 79–124.
29.
VibergA (1984) The verbs of perception: A typological study. In: ButtersworthBComrieBDahlO (eds) Explanations for Language Universals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 123–162.
30.
WiemerB (2010) Hearsay in European languages: Toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In: DiewaldGSmirnovaE (eds) Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 59–130.
31.
WiemerBStathiK (2010) Introduction: The database of evidential markers in European languages. A bird’s eye view of the conception of the database (the template and problems hidden beneath it). In: WiemerBStathiK (eds) Database on Evidentiality Markers in European LanguagesSTUF-Language Typology and Universals63(4): 275–285.
