In this article we study the work and communication practices of two highly connected organizations, the members of which have all access to instant messaging (IM) on a professional basis. We document the development of a communicational genre, that of ‘quick questions’, and analyze the sequence organization of such IM conversation threads. We show how ‘quick questions’ enable the collaborative accomplishment of complex, knowledge-intensive tasks by recruiting colleagues constituted as experts capable of quickly answering information requests related to ongoing tasks. ‘Quick questions’ articulate communicative practices, ‘strong’ distribution of tasks and ‘organizing’ in highly connected organizations. We argue that they enact a distinctive cognitive and moral economy based on minimal forms of interaction and exchanges (which we call ‘contributions’), constituting a more general phenomenon.
AlterN (2009) Donner et prendre. La collaboration en entreprise. Paris: La Découverte.
2.
BrownPLevinsonS (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ChoH-KTrierMKimE (2005) The uses of instant messaging in working relationships: A case study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(4): article 17.
4.
ClarkH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ClaymanSHeritageJ (2002) Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication52(4): 749–775.
6.
ConeinBLatapyM (2008) Les usages épistémiques des TIC: le cas de l’Open Source. Sociologie du travail50(3): 331–352.
7.
CoorenF (2006) The world as a plenum of agencies. In: CoorenFTaylorJRvan EveryE (eds) Communication as Organizing. Empirical and Theoretical Explorations: The Dynamic of Text and Conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, pp. 81–100.
8.
CramtonC (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequence for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science12(3): 346–371.
9.
CurlTDrewP (2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction41(2): 129–153.
10.
CzarniawskaB (2009) A Theory of Organizing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
DanetBBogochB (1980) Fixed fight or free-for-all? An empirical study of combativeness in the adversary system of justice. British Journal of Law and Society7(1): 36–60.
12.
DenisJLicoppeC (2005) L’équipement de la coprésence dans les collectifs de travail: la messagerie instantanée en entreprise. In: BidetAPillonT (eds) Sociologie du travail et activité.Toulouse: Octares, pp. 47–65.
13.
DreyfusHLDreyfusSE (1987) From Socrates to expert systems: The limits of calculative rationality. In: RabbinowPSullivanW (eds) Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Berkeley: California University Press, pp. 327–350.
14.
EdwardsD (2007) Introduction to the special issue on calling for help. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(1): 1–7.
15.
EngeströmY (1999) Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work8: 63–93.
16.
GarrettRDanzigerJ (2007) IM = interruption management? Instant messaging and disruption in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication13(1): article 2, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/garrett.html
17.
GoffmanE (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
18.
GoldmanA (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19.
HeinemannT (2006) ‘Will you or can’t you?’ Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics38: 1081–1104.
20.
HeritageJ (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: AtkinsonJMHeritageJ (eds) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.
21.
HeritageJ (2004) Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In: FitchKSandersR (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 103–146.
22.
HeritageJ (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1): 1–29.
23.
HeritageJRaymondG (2012) Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In: de RuyterJ (ed.) Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–192.
24.
HudsonJChristensenJKelloggWEricksonT (2002) ‘I’d be overwhelmed, but it’s just one more thing to do’: Availability and interruption in research management. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 97–104.
25.
ImH-GYatesJOrliowskiW (2005) Temporal coordination through genres and genre systems. Information Technology and People18(2): 89–119.
26.
KitzingerCFrithH (1999) Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society10(3): 293–316.
27.
LuffPHindmarshJHeathC (2000) Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MehanH (1979) ‘What time is it Denise?’ Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Language in Society28(4): 285–294.
29.
NardiBWhittakerSBradnerE (2000) Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. In: Proceedings of CSCW’00. Philadelphia, PA, pp. 79–88.
30.
O’ConnaillBFrohlichD (1995) Timespace in the workspace: Dealing with interruptions. In: Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing (CHI’95). New York: ACM Press, pp. 262–263.
31.
OchsESchieffelinBPlattM (1978) Questions of immediate concern: Questions and politeness. In: GoodyE (ed.) Strategies in Social Interaction.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–55.
32.
OrlikowskiWYatesJ (1994) Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly39(4): 541–574.
33.
OrrJ (1996) Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
PankoRR (1984) Managerial communication patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing2(1): 95–122.
35.
PomerantzA (1988) Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communication Monographs55(4): 360–373.
36.
PomerantzA (2005) Using participants’ video stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In: te MolderHPotterJ (eds) Talk and Cognition: Discourse, Mind and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–113.
37.
Quan-HaaseACothrelJWellmanB (2005) Instant messaging for collaboration: A case study of a high tech firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(4): article 13.
38.
QuéréL (2006) L’environnement comme partenaire. In: BarbierJMDurandM (eds) Sujets, activités, environnements. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 7–29.
39.
RaymondG (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review68: 939–967.
40.
RaymondGZimmermanDH (2007) Rights and responsibilities in calls for help: The case of the mountain glade fire. Research on Language and Social Interaction40(1): 30–62.
41.
RiceRShookD (1990) Voice messaging, co-ordination and communication. In: GalegherJKrautREgidoC (eds) Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press, pp. 327–350.
42.
SacksH (1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: ButtonGLeeJR (eds) Talk and Social Organization.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54–69.
43.
SchegloffE (1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: ‘Can I ask you a question?’Sociological Inquiry50(3–4): 104–152.
44.
SchegloffE (1988) Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics12: 55–62
45.
SchegloffE (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
SchegloffESacksH (1973) Opening up closings. SemioticaVIII(4): 289–327.
47.
TaylorJvan EveryE (2000) The Emergent Organization: Communication as its Site and its Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing.
48.
TerasakiAK (2004) Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In: LernerG (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 171–223.
49.
TracyKRoblesJ (2009) Questions, questioning and institutional practices: An introduction. Discourse Studies11(2): 131–152.
50.
TuncerSLicoppeC (2013) Managers in informal interactions: The negotiations of roles through membership and organizational texts. Paper presented at 29th EGOS Conference, Montreal.
51.
WeickKSutcliffeKObstfeldtD (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science16(4): 409–421.
