Hart (this issue) offers a biologically based explanation for the use of an ‘epistemic positioning strategy’ aimed by speakers/writers at the legitimization of assertions, at persuading addressees of the veracity of the propositions, as a prior condition for the discursive legitimization of actions. This article focuses on various issues addressed in Hart’s article, among them the degree of commitment invoked in speakers/writers’ choice of epistemic stance expressions as legitimization strategies, as well as the expression of subjectivity/intersubjectivity in discourse and the degree to which this involves responsibility and accountability for the speaker/writer. The article also provides an alternative proposal of the categories identified by Bednarek (2006) for the conceptual domain of evidentiality.
AikhenvaldA (2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BednarekM (2006) Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text and Talk26(6): 635–660.
3.
BoyeKHarderP (2009) Evidentiality. Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language16(1): 9–43.
4.
ChafeWNicholsJ (eds) (1986) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. New York: Ablex.
5.
ChiltonP (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
6.
ChiltonP (2005) Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In: WodakRChiltonP (eds) A New Research Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–52.
7.
CosmidesL (1989) The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition31: 187–276.
8.
CosmidesLToobyJ (2000) Consider the source: The evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentations. In: SperberD (ed.) Metarepresentation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–116.
9.
de HaanF (1999) Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics18: 83–101.
10.
DendalePTasmowskiL (2001) Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics33: 339–348.
11.
DiewaldGSmirnovaE (eds) (2010) Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12.
Du BoisJW (1986) Self-evidence and ritual speech. In: ChafeWNicholsJ (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. New York: Ablex, 213–236.
13.
DurantiA (1993) Intentions, self, and responsibility: An essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. In: HillJHIrvineJT (eds) Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press, 24–47.
14.
FitnevaS (2001) Epistemic marking and reliability judgements: Evidence from Bulgarian. Journal of Pragmatics33: 401–420.
15.
GivónT (1982) Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language6(1): 23–49.
16.
GriceHP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: ColePMorganJL (eds) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
17.
HurfordJR (2007) The Origins of Meaning: Language in the Light of Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
LangackerRW (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
LangackerRW (2000) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20.
LangackerRW (2004) Aspects of the grammar of finite clauses. In: AchardMKemmerS (eds) Language, Culture and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 535–577.
21.
LangackerRW (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22.
Marín ArreseJ (2004) Evidential and epistemic qualifications in the discourse of fact and opinion. In: Marín ArreseJ (ed.) Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality. Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 153–184.
Marín ArreseJ (2009) Effective vs. epistemic stance, and subjectivity/intersubjectivity in political discourse: A case study. In: TsangalidisAFacchinettiR (eds) Studies on English Modality. In Honour of Frank R. Palmer. Berlin: Peter Lang, 23–52.
25.
Marín ArreseJ (2011) Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse: Legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility. In: HartC (ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 193–223.
26.
MatlockT (1989) Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials. Berkeley Linguistics Society15: 215–225.
27.
NuytsJ (2001) Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28.
PalmerF (2001) Mood and Modality, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PlungianV (2001) The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics33: 349–357.
30.
SandersJ (1999) Degree of subjectivity in epistemic modals and perspective representation. In: StadlerLEyrichC (eds) Issues in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 471–489.
31.
SandersJSpoorenW (1996) Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: A study of Dutch epistemic modifiers. Cognitive Linguistics7(3): 241–264.
32.
SperberD (2000) Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In: SperberD (ed.) Metarepresentation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 117–138.
33.
SweetserE (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
TalmyL (1985) Force dynamics in language and thought. Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society21(1): 293–337.
35.
Van der AuweraJPlungianV (1998) Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2: 79–124.
36.
van DijkTA (2011) Discourse, knowledge, power and politics: Towards critical epistemic discourse analysis. In: HartC (ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–63.
37.
WhitePRR (2006) Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. In: LassenIStrunckJVestergaardT (eds) Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 37–67.
38.
WiemerB (2010) Hearsay in European languages: Toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking. In: DiewaldGSmirnovaE (eds) Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–129.
39.
WillettT (1988) A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language12: 51–97.
