In this article we investigate the nature of problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Previous studies have raised concerns about the peer encouragement of self-harming behaviours in online forums, and this analysis considers the nature of peer interaction on a specific forum, ‘ SharpTalk’. This was a research forum which explored the potential of online communities to foster engagement and shared learning between NHS professionals and young people who self-harm. This analysis draws on conversation analysis methods to study problem presentation and responses, and nature of advice given. Analysis highlighted both the tendency to offer advice where it was not asked for, and the mundane ‘safe’ nature of advice. This awareness of how young people interact and provide support online is important for those setting up online interventions to support young people who self-harm.
Antaki C., Ardévol E., Núñez F. and Vayreda A. ( 2005) ‘For she who knows who she is’: Managing accountability in online forum messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11(1), article 6.
2.
Burke M., Kraut R. and Joyce E.(2010) Membership claims and requests: Conversation-level newcomer socialization strategies in online groups. Small Group Research41(1): 4-40.
3.
Edwards D. and Potter J. ( 2001) Introduction to discursive psychology. In: McHoul A and Rapley M (eds) How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods. London: Continuum International, 12-24.
4.
Emmison M. and Danby S. ( 2007) Troubles announcements and reasons for calling: Initial actions in opening sequences in calls to a national children’s helpline . Research on Language and Social Interaction40(1): 63-87.
5.
Hepburn A. and Potter J. ( 2007) Crying receipts: Time, empathy and institutional practice . Research on Language and Social Interaction40(1): 89-116.
6.
Heritage J. and Sefi S. ( 1992) Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. In: Drew P and Heritage J (eds) Talk at Work. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 359-419.
7.
Horne J. and Wiggins S.(2009) Doing being ‘on the edge’: Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health and Illness31(2): 170-184.
8.
Hutchby I. and Wooffitt R. ( 1997) Conversation Analysis. Oxford : Blackwell.
9.
Jefferson G. and Lee JRE ( 1981) The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’ . Journal of Pragmatics5: 399-422.
10.
Lamerichs J. and Te Molder H. ( 2003) Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society5(4): 451-473.
11.
Morrow PR ( 2006) Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: Some discourse features. Discourse Studies8: 531-548.
12.
Pedersen S. and Smithson J. ( 2010) Supporting or stressing out? A study of membership, activity and interactions in an online parenting community. In: Taiwo R (ed.) Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction. Hershey, PA: ICI Global, 88-103.
13.
Potter J. ( 2003) Discourse analysis. In: Hardy M and Bryman A (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis. London: SAGE, 607-624.
14.
Pudlinski C. ( 2002) Accepting and rejecting advice as competent peers: Caller dilemmas on a warm line. Discourse Studies4(4): 481-500.
15.
Rodham K., Gavin J. and Miles M. ( 2007) I hear, I listen and I care: A qualitative investigation into the function of a self-harm message board. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior37(4): 422-430.
16.
Sacks H. ( 1966) The search for help: No one to turn to. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
17.
Sharkey S., Jones R., Smithson J., Ford T., Owens C., Emmens T. and Hewis, E. (under submission) Ethical Practice in Internet Research involving Vulnerable People: Lessons from a Self-harm Discussion Forum Study (SharpTalk).
18.
Smithson J., Sharkey SJ, Jones R., Ford T., Emmens T., Hewitt E. and Owens C. (forthcoming) Membership and boundary maintenance in an online self-harm forum . Qualitative Health Research.
19.
Sneijder P. and Te Molder HFM ( 2004) ‘Health should not have to be a problem’. Talking health and accountability in an internet forum on veganism. Journal of Health Psychology9(4): 599-616.
20.
Stommel E. and Koole T.(2010) The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies12(3): 357-378.
21.
Stommel W. ( 2009) Entering an Online Support Group on Eating Disorders: A Discourse Analysis. New York: Rodopi.
22.
Tracey K. ( 1997) Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction30(4): 315-343.
23.
Vayreda A. and Antaki C.(2009) Social support and unsolicited advice in a bipolar disorder online forum. Qualitative Health Research19: 931-942.
24.
Whitlock J., Powers J. and Eckenrode J. ( 2006) The virtual cutting edge: The Internet and adolescent self-injury. Developmental Psychology42(3): 407-417.
