Disagreement,confusion,disapproval,turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online April, 2011
Disagreement,confusion,disapproval,turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats
This study evidences turn actions done by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns as employed in quasisynchronous chats that are not discussed in prior literature. A brief introduction to the research background of ellipsis marks in online chats is followed by a description of the data collected before delving into the actions done by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns. Data were culled from multi-party chats among tertiary students during a critical reasoning class. A Conversation Analysis-informed approach is applied in this article to analyze the preference organization of elliptical turns that illustrate several turn actions which include responses signaling disagreement, confusion and disapproval besides initial actions of eliciting responses and holding the floor. More than punctuation marks or paralinguistic restitution of silences, their interpersonal meaningfulness in sequential context and differentness/similarity vis-a-vis temporal silences are demonstratively shown in microscopic and interpretive description of chat excerpts.
Androutsopoulos, J. and Beißwenger, M. ( 2008) ‘Introduction: Data and Methods in Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis’, Language@Internet5. Available at: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1609/introduction.pdf/
2.
Baron, N.S. ( 2008) Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Beißwenger, M. ( 2008) ‘Situated Chat Analysis as a Window to the User’s Perspective; Aspects of Temporal and Sequential Organization’, Language@Internet 5. Available at: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1532/beiss.pdf/
4.
Berglund, T.Ö. ( 2009) ‘Disrupted Turn Adjacency and Coherence Maintenance in Instant Messaging Conversations’, Language@Internet6. Available at: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2009/2106/Berglund.pdf/
5.
Bilmes, J. ( 1988) ‘The Concept of Preference in Conversation Analysis’ , Language in Society17: 161-81.
6.
Bolliger, D.U. ( 2009) ‘Use Patterns of Visual Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication’, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education10(2): 95-108.
7.
Boyle, R. ( 2000) ‘Whatever Happened to Preference Organization?’ , Journal of Pragmatics32: 583-604.
8.
Brown, A. ( 1999) Singapore English in a Nutshell: An Alphabetical Description of its Features. SingaporeFederal Publications.
9.
Crystal, D. ( 2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10.
Darics, E. ( 2010) ‘Politeness in Computer-Mediated Discourse of a Virtual Team’, Journal of Politeness Research6: 129-150.
11.
Davidson, J. ( 1984) ‘Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 102-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Dresner, E. and Herring, S.C.(2010) ‘Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force’, Communication Theory20: 249-268.
13.
Garcia, A.C. and Jacobs, J.B. ( 1998) ‘The Interactional Organization of Computer Mediated Communication in the College Classroom’, Qualitative Sociology21: 299-317.
14.
Garcia, A.C. and Jacobs, J.B. ( 1999) ‘The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer Mediated Communication’, Research on Language and Social Interaction32: 337-67.
15.
Goh, C. and Woo, Y.Y. (eds) (2009) The Coxford Singlish Dictionary , 2nd edn. Singapore: Angsana Books.
16.
Gupta, A.F. ( 1992) ‘The Pragmatic Particles of Singapore Colloquial English’, Journal of Pragmatics18: 31-57.
17.
Gupta, A.F. ( 2006) ‘Singlish on the Web’, in A. Hashim and N. Hashim (eds) Varieties of English in Southeast Asia and Beyond, pp. 19-37. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
18.
Hanna, S. ( 2003) An Essential Guide to Singlish. Singapore : Gartbooks.
19.
Hård af Segerstad, Y. ( 2003) ‘Use and Adaptation of Written Language to the Conditions of Computer-mediated Communication’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Available at: http://www.ling.gu.se/~ylvah/dokument/ylva_diss.pdf
20.
Heritage, J. ( 1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge : Polity Press.
21.
Herring, S. ( 1999) ‘Interactional Coherence in CMC’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication4. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
22.
Jacobson, D. ( 1999) ‘Impression Formation in Cyberspace: Online Expectations and Offline Experiences in Text-Based Virtual Communication’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication5. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html
23.
Kalman, Y.M. and Rafaeli, S. ( 2011) ‘Online Pauses and Silence: Chronemic Expectancy Violations in Written Computer-Mediated Communication’, Communication Research38: 54-69.
24.
Kalman, Y.M., Ravid, G., Raban, D.R. and Rafaeli, S. ( 2006) ‘Pauses and Response Latencies: A Chronemic Analysis of Asynchronous CMC’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12: 1-23.
25.
Kotthoff, H. ( 1993) ‘Diagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures’, Language in Society22: 193-216.
26.
Krohn, F.B. ( 2004) ‘A Generational Approach to Using Emoticons as Nonverbal Communication’, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication34: 321-28.
27.
Lea, M. and Spears, R. ( 1992) ‘Paralanguage and Social Perception in Computer-Mediated Communication’, Journal of Organizational Computing2: 321-41.
28.
Lerch, A. ( 2005) ‘The Concept of Preference and its Manifestation in Hungarian Verbal Conflict Sequences’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica52(1): 41-75.
29.
Li, W. ( 2005) ‘"How Can You Tell?" Towards a Common Sense Explanation of Conversational Code-Switching’, Journal of Pragmatics37: 375-89.
30.
Liu, Y. ( 2000) ‘The Effects of Nonverbal Cues on Impression Formation in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Exploratory Study’. Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database (UMI No. 9965844).
31.
Liu, Y. ( 2002) ‘The Impacts of Frequency and Duration of Messaging on Relational Development in Computer-Mediated Communication’, in M.A. Fitzgerald, M. Orey and R.M. Branch (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook2002 (27), pp. 33-51. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
32.
Low, E.L. and Brown, A. ( 2005) English in Singapore: An Introduction. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).
33.
Low, E.L. and Deterding, D. ( 2003) ‘A Corpus-Based Description of Particles in Spoken Singapore English’, in D. Deterding , E.L. Low and A. Brown (eds) The English Language in Singapore: Research on Grammar, pp. 58-66. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
34.
Markman, K.M. (2009) ‘So What Shall WeTalk About: Openings and Closings in Chat-Based Virtual Meetings’, Journal of Business Communication46: 150-70.
35.
Nilsen, M. and Mäkitalo, Å. ( 2010) ‘Towards a Conversational Culture? How Participants Establish Strategies for Co-Ordinating Chat Posting in the Context of In-Service Training’, Discourse Studies12(1): 90-105.
36.
Ong, K.K.W. and Zhang, L.J. ( 2010) ‘Metalinguistic Filters Within the Bilingual Language Faculty: A Study of Young English-Chinese Bilinguals’, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research39: 243-72 (doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9137-z).
37.
Panyametheekul, S. and Herring, S.C. ( 2003) ‘Gender and Turn Allocation in a Thai Chat Room’ , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication9. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/panya_herring.html
38.
Platt, J. and Ho, M.L. ( 1989) ‘Discourse Particles in Singaporean English: Substratum Influences and Universals’, World Englishes8(2): 215-21.
39.
Pomerantz, A. ( 1984a) ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Pomerantz, A. ( 1984b) ‘Pursuing a Response’, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 152-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Pomerantz, A. ( 2008) ‘Preference Organization Revisited: Displaying Speaker’s Stance Toward Performing an Action’, paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, 31 July, available at: http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/3/7/4/6/pages237466/p237466-1.php.
42.
Raclaw, J. ( 2008) ‘Two Patterns for Conversational Closings in Instant Message Discourse’, Colorado Research in Linguistics21. Available at: http://www.colorado.edu/ling/CRIL/Volume21_Issue1/paper_RACLAW.pdf?q=girlbot.
43.
Rintel, E.S. and Pittam, J. ( 1997) ‘Strangers in a Strange Land: Interaction Management on Internet Relay Chat’, Human Communication Research23: 507-34.
44.
Rintel, E.S., Mulholland, J. and Pittam, J. ( 2001) ‘First Things First: Internet Relay Chat Openings’ , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication6. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue3/rintel.html.
45.
Rintel, E.S., Pittam, J. and Mulholland, J. ( 2003) ‘Time Will Tell: Ambiguous Non-Responses of Internet Relay Chat’, Electronic Journal of Communication13. Available at: http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/013/1/01312.HTML .
46.
Sacks, H. ( 1987) ‘On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation’, in G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organization, pp. 54-69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
47.
Sacks, H. ( 1995) Lectures on Conversation. Vol. I&II. Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
Sacks, H. ( 2004) ‘An Initial Characterization of the Organization of Speaker Turn-Taking in Conversation’, in G.H. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, pp. 35-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
49.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. ( 1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking in Conversation’, Language50: 596-735.
50.
Schegloff, E. ( 1988) ‘On an Actual Virtual Servo-Mechanism for Guessing Bad News: A Single Case Conjecture’, Social Problems35: 442-57.
51.
Schegloff, E. ( 2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Schegloff, E. and Sacks, H. ( 1973) ‘Opening Up Closings’, Semiotica8: 289-327.
53.
Shortis, T. ( 2007) ‘Revoicing Txt: Spelling, Vernacular Orthography and ‘‘Unregimented Writing’’’, in S. Posteguillo, M.J. Esteve and M.L. Gea-Valor (eds) The Texture of Internet: Netlinguistics in Progress, pp. 2-23. Newcastle : Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
54.
Simpson, J. ( 2005a) ‘Conversational Floors in Synchronous Text-Based CMC Discourse’, Discourse Studies7: 337-61.
55.
Simpson, J. ( 2005b) ‘Meaning-Making Online: Discourse and CMC in a Language Learning Community’, in A. Mendez Vilas, B. Gonzalez Pereira, J. Mesa Gonzalez and J.A. Mesa Gonzales (eds) Recent Research Development in Learning Technologies, pp. 175-9. Badajoz: Formatex .
56.
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Xing, J. ( 2005) ‘Managing Talk and Non-Talk in Intercultural Interactions: Insights from Two Chinese-British Business Meetings’, Multilingua24: 55-74.
57.
Squires, L. ( 2010) Enregistering Internet Language, Language in Society39: 457-492.
58.
Stommel, W. and Koole, T.(2010) ‘The Online Support Group as a Community: A Micro-Analysis of the Interaction with a New Member’, Discourse Studies12(3): 357-378.
59.
Tagliamonte, S.A. and Denis, D. ( 2008) ‘Linguistic Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language’, American Speech83: 3-34.
60.
Taylor, A. ( 1994) ‘Preference Organization in Teacher-Supervisor Talk’ , Australian Review of Applied Linguistics11: 137-52.
61.
Thurlow, C. ( 2003) ‘Generation Txt? Exposing the Sociolinguistics of Young People’s Text Messaging’, Discourse Analysis Online1. Available at: http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/open/2002/003/thurlow2002003-01.html.
62.
Tsui, A.B.M. and Ki, W.W. ( 1996) ‘An Analysis of Conference Interactions on TeleNex - A Computer Network for ESL Teachers’, Educational Technology Research and Development44: 23-44.
63.
Walther, J.B. ( 1996) ‘Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction’, Communication Research23: 3-43.
64.
Walther, J.B. and Tidwell, L.C. ( 1995) ‘Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication, and the Effect of Chronemics on Relational Communication’, Journal of Organizational Computing5: 355-78.
65.
Walther, J.B., Loh, T. and Granka, L. ( 2005) ‘Let Me Count the Ways: The Interchange of Verbal and Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Affinity’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology24: 36-65.
66.
Warschauer, M. ( 2002) ‘The Internet and Linguistic Pluralism’, in I. Synder (ed.) Silicon Literacies: Communication, Innovation and Education in the Electronic Age, pp. 62-74. London : Routledge.
67.
Wee, L. ( 2004) ‘Singapore English: Morphology and Syntax’ , in B. Kortmann, K. Burridge, R. Mesthrie, E. W. Schneider and C. Upton (eds) A Handbook of Varieties of English Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax, pp. 1058-72. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
68.
Werry, C.C. ( 1996) ‘Linguistic and Interactional Features of Internet Relay Chat’, in S.C. Herring (ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, pp. 47-63. Benjamins: Amsterdam .
