This article explores the distribution and use of a relatively new grammatical format in English, it’s like + enactment. We propose that it’s like utterances are used to enact thoughts, feelings and attitudes which are internal and affect-laden assessments of a prior utterance or event, produced as assessments that anyone in the same situation might have had. As such they tend to occur within stories, typically during the closing of a story. The enactments are often ‘response cries’ (Goffman, 1978) such as oh, mm, wow, and man. Because of the highly indexical nature of this grammatical format, it represents a fascinating site for participants to work out a ‘world known in common’ (Goodwin, personal communication).
Barbieri, F. ( 2005) ‘Quotative Use in American English: A Corpus-based, Cross-register Comparison’, Journal of English Linguistics33: 222-256.
2.
Barbieri, F. ( 2009) ‘Quotative Be Like in American English: Ephemeral or Here to Stay?’, English World-Wide30: 68-90.
3.
Barnes, R. and Moss, D. ( 2007) ‘Communicating a Feeling: The Social Organization of ‘‘Private Thoughts’’’, Discourse Studies9(2): 123-148.
4.
Blyth, C., Recktenwald, S. and Wang, J. ( 1990) ‘I’m Like, ‘‘Say What?!’’ A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative’, American Speech65: 215-227.
5.
Buchstaller, I. ( 2004) ‘The Sociolinguistic Constraints on the Quotative System - US English and British English Compared’, unpublished, University of Edinburgh.
6.
Buchstaller, I. and D’Arcy, A. ( 2009) ‘Localized Globalization: A Multi-local, Multivariate Investigation of Quotative Be Like’, Journal of Sociolinguistics13: 291-331.
7.
Carbaugh, D. ( 1988) Talking American: Cultural Discourses on Donahue. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. ( 1990) ‘Quotations as Demonstrations’, Language66: 764-805.
9.
Cukor-Avila, P. ( 2002) ‘She Say, She Go, She Be Like: Verbs of Quotation Over Time in African American Vernacular English’, American Speech77: 3-31.
10.
Daily-O’Cain, J. ( 2000) ‘The Sociolinguistic Distribution and Attitudes towards Focuser Like and Quotative Like’, Journal of Sociolinguistics4: 60-80.
11.
Drew, P. and Holt, E. ( 1995) ‘Idiomatic Expressions and Their Role in the Organization of Topic Transition in Conversation’, in M. Everaert, E.J. v. d. Linden, A. Schenk and R. Schreuder (eds) Idioms, Structural and Psychological Perspectives , pp. 117-132. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Ferrara, K. and Bell, B. ( 1995) ‘Sociolinguistic Variation and Discourse Function of Constructed Dialogue Introducers: The Case of Be+Like’, American Speech70: 265-290.
13.
Ford, C. and Fox, B. (forthcoming) ‘Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables’, in E. Reber, D. Barth and M. Selting (eds) Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
Fox Tree, J. and Tomlinson, J., Jr ( 2008) ‘The Rise of Like in Spontaneous Quotations’ , Discourse Processes45: 85-102.
15.
Goffman, E. ( 1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Goffman, E. ( 1978) ‘Response Cries’, Language54: 787-815.
17.
Goffman, E. ( 1979) ‘Footing’, Semiotica25: 1-29.
18.
Golato, A. ( 2000) ‘An Innovative German Quotative for Reporting on Embodied Actions: und ich so/und er so ‘‘and I’m Like/and He’s Like’’’, Journal of Pragmatics32: 29-54.
19.
Goodwin, C. ( 1996) ‘Transparent Vision’, in E. Ochs, E. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, pp. 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Goodwin, C. (in preparation) ‘Building Action with Diverse Semiotic Resources in a Public Environment’.
21.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. ( 1987) ‘Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments’, Papers in Pragmatics1: 1-55.
22.
Hakulinen, A. ( 1987) ‘Avoiding Person Reference in Finnish’, in J. Verscheuren and M. Pertolucci-Papi (eds) The Pragmatic Perspective, pp. 140-153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23.
Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. ( 2005) ‘The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences’, Social Psychology Quarterly68: 15-38.
24.
Holt, E. ( 2000) ‘Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech’, Research on Language and Social Interaction33(4): 425-454.
25.
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. ( 1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Jones, G.M. and Schieffelin, B.B. (2009) ‘Enquoting Voices, AccomplishingTalk: Uses of ‘‘Be’’ + ‘‘Like’’ in Instant Messaging’, Language & Communication29(1): 77-113.
27.
Mathis, T. and Yule, G. ( 1994) ‘Zero Quotatives’, Discourse Processes18: 63-76.
28.
Meehan, T. ( 1991) ‘It’s Like, What’s Happening in the Evolution of Like?’, Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics16: 37-51.
29.
Miller, J. and Weinert, R. ( 1995) ‘The Function of Like in Dialogue’, Journal of Pragmatics23: 365-393.
30.
Niemalä, M. ( 2005) ‘Voiced Direct Reported Speech in Conversational Storytelling: Sequential Patterns of Stance Taking’, SKY Journal of Linguistics18: 197-221.
31.
Romaine, S. and Lange, D. ( 1991) ‘The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress’, American Speech66: 227-279.
32.
Schegloff, E. ( 1972) ‘Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place’, in D.N. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 75-119. New York: Macmillan, The Free Press.
33.
Schegloff, E. ( 1986) ‘The Routine as Achievement’, Human Studies9: 111-151.
34.
Schegloff, E. ( 2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
35.
Schourup, L. ( 1985) Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
36.
Singler, J. ( 2001) ‘Why You Can’t Do a VARBRUL Study of Quotatives and What Such a Study Can Show Us’, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers7: 257-278.
37.
Singler, J. ( 2005) ‘Like, Quote Me’, PBS.com, available online at: [http://www.pbs.org/speak/ahead/change/change], accessed 8 August 2005.
38.
Stivers, T. ( 2008) ‘Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation’, Research on Language in Social Interaction41: 31-57.
39.
Streeck, J. ( 2002) ‘Grammars, Words, and Embodied Meanings. On the Evolution and Uses of So and Like’, Journal of Communication52: 581-596.
40.
Tagliamonte, S. and D’Arcy, A. ( 2004) ‘He’s Like, She’s Like: The Quotative System in Canadian Youth’, Journal of Sociolinguistics8: 493-514.
41.
Tagliamonte, S. and Hudson, R. ( 1999) ‘Be Like et al. Beyond America: The Quotative System in British andCanadian Youth’, Journal of Sociolinguistics3: 147-172.
42.
Tannen, D. ( 1986) ‘Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative’, in F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and Indirect Speech, pp. 311-332. The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
43.
Underhill, R. ( 1988) ‘Like is, Like, Focus’, American Speech63: 234-246.
44.
Vasquez, C. and Urzua, A.(2010) ‘Reported Speech and Reported Mental States in Mentoring Meetings: Exploring Novice Teacher Identities’, Research on Language and Social Interaction42: 1-19.
45.
Winter, J. ( 2002) ‘Discourse Quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents Performing Voices’, Australian Journal of Linguistics22: 5-21.
