This article presents a seven-step corpus-based approach to discourse analysis that starts with a detailed analysis of each individual text in a corpus that can then be generalized across all texts of a corpus, providing a description of typical patterns of discourse organization that hold for the entire corpus. This approach is applied specifically to a methodology that is used to analyze texts in terms of the functional/communicative structures that typically make up texts in a genre: move analysis. The resulting corpus-based approach for conducting a move analysis significantly enhances the value of this often used (and misused) methodology, while at the same time providing badly needed guidelines for a methodology that lacks them. A corpus of ‘birthmother letters’ is used to illustrate the approach.
Baker, P. ( 2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
2.
Bhatia, V. ( 1993a) Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings . London: Longman.
3.
Bhatia, V. ( 1993b) ‘Simplification vs. Easification: The Case of Legal Texts’, Applied Linguistics4(1): 42-54.
4.
Bhatia, V. ( 1998) ‘Generic Patterns in Fundraising Discourse’ , New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising22: 95-110.
5.
Biber, D., Connor, U. and Upton, T. ( 2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. ( 1998) Corpus Linguistics Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. ( 1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.
8.
Cohen, M.A. ( 2007) ‘Dear Birthmother: A Linguistic Analysis of Letters Written to Expectant Mothers Considering Adoption’, unpublished master’s thesis, Indiana University , Indianapolis, available online at: [http://hdl.handle.net/1805/1114].
9.
Connor, U. ( 1996) Contrastive Rhetoric. Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Connor, U. and Upton, T. ( 2004) ‘The Genre of Grant Proposals: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis’, in U. Connor and T. Upton (eds) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics, pp. 235-56. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
11.
Hoey, M. ( 1986) ‘Overlapping Patterns of Discourse Organization and Their Implications for Clause Relational Analysis in Problem-Solution Text’, in C.R. Cooper and S. Greenbaum (eds) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches, pp. 187-214. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Kanoksilapatham, B. ( 2005) ‘Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles’ , English for Specific Purposes24: 269-92.
13.
Mandler, J.M. and Johnson, N.S. ( 1977) ‘Remembrance of Things Parsed: Story Structure and Recall’, Cognitive Psychology9: 111-51.
14.
Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (eds) (1992) Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
15.
Nwogu, K. ( 1991) ‘Structure of Science Popularizations: A Genre-Analysis Approach to the Schema of Popularized Medical Texts’, English for Specific Purposes10(2): 111-23.
16.
Posteguillo, S. ( 1999) ‘The Schematic Structure of Computer Science Research Articles’, English for Specific Purposes18(2): 139-58.
17.
Samraj, B. ( 2002) ‘Introductions in Research Articles: Variation across Disciplines’, English for Specific Purposes21: 1-17.
18.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. (eds) ( 2001) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
Scott, M. ( 2004) Oxford Wordsmith Tools Version 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Swales, J. ( 1981) Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: University of Aston.
21.
Swales, J. ( 1990) Genre Analysis: English for Academic and Research Settings . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Thompson, S. ( 1994) ‘Frameworks and Context: A Genre Based Approach to Analyzing Lecture Introductions’, English for Specific Purposes13(2): 171-86.
23.
Upton, T. ( 2002) ‘Understanding Direct Mail Letters as a Genre’ , International Journal of Corpus Linguistics7(1): 65-85.
24.
Upton, T. and Connor, U. ( 2001) ‘Using Computerized Corpus Analysis to Investigate the Textlinguistic Discourse Moves of a Genre’, English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal20: 313-29.
25.
van Dijk, T. ( 1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Williams, R. ( 1999) ‘Results Section of Medical Research Articles: An Analysis of Rhetorical Categories for Pedagogical Purpose’, English for Specific Purposes18(4): 347-66.
