In this article, we investigate the functional itinerary followed by Hebrew be'emet (`really, actually, indeed', lit. `in truth'), through a close exploration of its synchronic uses in the contemporary spoken language. Since this utterance, derived from the noun 'emet (`truth'), is so profoundly tied in with the speaker's beliefs and attitudes towards his or her discourse, we consider issues of metalanguage, modality, evidentiality, and stance. Be'emet is traditionally classified as `adverb', but in our corpus of naturally occurring Hebrew conversation, only 22 percent of all tokens function in this role. Whereas these tokens function referentially, the great majority of tokens (70%) function in the interpersonal realm of discourse, manifesting properties of discourse markers: 44.5 percent of all tokens function as full-fledged discourse markers (both semantically and structurally, Maschler, 1998) serving mirative (DeLancey, 2001), reprimanding, or negating any doubt roles; 22.5 percent function to ratify a previous stance; and three percent function to latch onto a new topic, requesting its elaboration. An intermediate category (8%) is composed of tokens functioning both referentially and interpersonally, mid-way between an adverb and a discourse marker, in a way that is particularly illuminating for understanding the changes undergone by be'emet as a result of its employment in discourse. The study thus lends support to previous studies of subjectification and intersubjectification in the process of grammaticization of discourse markers (Traugott, 2003; Traugott and Dasher, 2002).
Auer, P. (2005) `Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar' , Text25: 7-36.
2.
Becker, A.L. (1988) `Language in Particular: A Lecture', in D. Tannen (ed.) Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding (Lectures from the 1985 LSA/TESOL and NEH Institutes) , pp. 17-35. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Reprinted in Becker (1995).
3.
Becker, A.L. (1995) Beyond Translation: Essays Toward a Modern Philology . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (1988) `Adverbial Stance Types in English', Discourse Processes11: 1-34.
5.
Brinton, L.J. (1996) Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
6.
Bybee, J.L. and Hopper, P. (2001) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7.
Chafe, W. (1986) `Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing', in W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, pp. 261-72. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Chafe, W. (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
DeLancey, S. (2001) `The Mirative and Evidentiality', Journal of Pragmatics33: 369-82.
10.
Downing, A. (2001) ```Surely You Knew!'': Surely as a Marker of Evidentiality and Stance', Funcions of Language8(2): 251-85.
11.
Du Bois, J.W. (2001) `Towards a Dialogic Syntax', manuscript, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
12.
Du Bois, J.W., Cumming, S., Schuetze-Coburn, S. and Paolino, D. (1992) Discourse Transcription: Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 4. Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
13.
Even Shoshan, A. (1986) Hamilon Hexadash [The New Dictionary]. Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.
14.
Even Shoshan, A. (2003) Milon Even Shoshan [The Even Shoshan Dictionary] . Jerusalem: Hamilon Hexadash Ltd .
15.
Ferrara, K. (1997) `Form and Function of the Discourse Marker Anyway: Implications for Discourse Analysis', Linguistics35: 343-78.
16.
Fischer, K. (2006) `Towards an Understanding of the Spectrum of Approaches to Discourse Particles: Introduction to the Volume', in K. Fischer (ed.) Approaches to Discourse Particles , pp. 1-20. Amsterdam: North Holland/ Elsevier .
17.
Fleischman, S. and Yaguello, M. (2004) `Discourse Markers in Comparative Perspective: A Contribution to Cross-language Pragmatics', in C.L. Moder and A. Martinovic-Zic (eds) Discourse Across Languages and Cultures, pp. 129-47. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
18.
Ford, C.E. and Thompson, S.A. (1996) `Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, Intonational, and Pragmatic Resources for the Management of Turns', in E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, pp. 134-84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Friedman, V.A. (1986) `Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian', in W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, pp. 168-87. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
Goldenberg, G. (1998) `On Verbal Structure and the Hebrew Verb', in Studies in Semitic Linguistics, pp. 148-96. Jerusalem: Magnes.
22.
Haviland, J.B. (1987) `Fighting Words: Evidential Particles, Affect and Argument', in J. Aske, N. Berry, L. Michaelis and H. Filip (eds) Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society on Grammar and Cognition, pp. 343-54. 14-16 February 1987, Berkeley, CA.
23.
Hopper, P.J. and Thompson, S.A. (in press) `Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction', in R. Laury (ed.) Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multi-functionality of Conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
Hopper, P.J. and Traugott, E.C. (2003) Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Jucker, A.H. and Ziv, Y. (eds) (1998) Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
26.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003) Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27.
Maschler, Y. (1994) `Metalanguaging and Discourse Markers in Bilingual Conversation', Language in Society23: 325-66.
28.
Maschler, Y. (1998) `Rotse lishmoa keta? ``Wanna Hear Something Weird/Funny [Lit. `a Segment']?'': The Discourse Markers Segmenting Israeli Hebrew Talk-in-interaction' , in A.H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds) Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, pp. 13-59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
29.
Maschler, Y. (2002) `The Role of Discourse Markers in the Construction of Multivocality in Israeli Hebrew Talk-in-interaction', Research on Language and Social Interaction35: 1-38.
30.
Maschler, Y. (2003) `The Discourse Marker nu: Israeli Hebrew Impatience in Interaction', Text23: 89-128.
31.
Maschler, Y. (2004) `The Haifa Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew', available online at: http://hevra.haifa.ac.il/com/maschler/ , accessed August 2004.
32.
Maschler, Y. (in press a) `Discourse Markers', in International Encyclopedia of Communication. New York: Basic Blackwell .
33.
Maschler, Y. (in press b) Metalanguage in Interaction: Hebrew Discourse Markers . Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
34.
Ramat, P. and Ricca, D. (1994) `Prototypical Adverbs: On the Scalarity/radiality of the Notion of ADVERB', Rivista di Linguistica6: 289-326.
35.
Ravid, D. (1977) `Mispar heibetim shel be'ayat seder hamarkivim be'ivrit yisra'elit modernit' [Several Aspects of the Problem of Element Order in Modern Israeli Hebrew], balshanut, 'ivrit xofshit [Hebrew Computational, Formal, and Applied Linguistics]11: 1-45 (in Hebrew).
36.
Schegloff, E.A. (1996) `Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction', in E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, pp. 52-133. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
37.
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
38.
Schiffrin, D. (2001) `Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context' , in D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 54-75. Oxford : Blackwell.
39.
Schourup, L. (1999) `Discourse Markers: Tutorial Overview', Lingua107: 227-65.
40.
Schwenter, S.A. (2000) `Viewpoints and Polysemy: Linking Adversative and Causal Meanings of Discourse Markers', in E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann (eds) Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast, pp. 257-81. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter.
41.
Schwenter, S.A. and Traugott, E.C. (2000) `Invoking Scalarity: The Development of in Fact' , Journal of Historical Pragmatics1: 7-25.
42.
Tannen, D. (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Traugott, E.C. (1995a) `The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization', 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995 (version of 11/97), available online at: http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/subject2intersubject.pdf, accessed 22 January 2004.
44.
Traugott, E.C. (1995b) `Subjectification in Grammaticalisation', in D. Stein and S. Wright (eds) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 31-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Traugott, E.C. (2003) `From Subjectification to Intersubjectification' , in R. Hickey (ed.) Motives for Language Change, pp. 124-39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Traugott, E.C. (2007) `(Inter)subjectification and Unidirectionality' , Journal of Historical Pragmatics8: 295-309.
47.
Traugott, E.C. and Dasher, R.B. (2002) `The Development of Adverbials with Discourse Marker Function', in Regularity in Semantic Change, pp. 152-89. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
