Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines an interrogative construction with which recipients in Finnish interactions treat the co-participant's prior action as having exhibited a stance that was overstated. A key element in the interrogative is the intensifier niin which foregrounds the scalar character of its head word (e.g. niin hirmune `so/that/as terrible') and suggests that the place it points to is too high on the scale. We will show that the niin-interrogative can target something the co-participant explicitly mentioned or only implied, and it can have in its scope either the prior turn or a longer stretch of talk. Niin-interrogatives form one means for indicating that the co-participant's claim departed from some normal way of perceiving social life, and they orient to a moral norm of walking the golden mean. As compared to other ways of dealing with exaggeration, a niin-interrogative allows the recipient to express her disagreeing stance in a fashion that avoids an open conflict.

Keywords

disaffiliation exaggeration Finnish intensifier interrogatives questions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arminen, I. and Halonen, M. (in press) `Laughing With and At Patients — The Roles of Laughter in Confrontations in Addiction Therapy', Qualitative Report.

Berg, M. (2003) Syytöksiä ja epäilyksiä. Toimittajan ja poliitikon vuorovaikutus televisiokeskustelussa [English abstract: Accusations and Suspicions. On Interaction between Journalists and Politicians in Televised Conversation] . Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society .

Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Thompson, S.A. (2005) `Linguistic Practice for Retracting Overstatements: ``Concessive Repair''', in A. Hakulinen and M. Selting (eds) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies in the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction , pp. 257—88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

Drew, P. (1998) ` Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct ', Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3&4): 295—325.

Drew, P. (2003) `Precision and Exaggeration in Interaction' , American Sociological Review 68: 917—38.

Drew, P. (2005) `The Interactional Generation of Exaggerated Versions in Conversations', in A. Hakulinen and M. Selting (eds) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies in the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction , pp. 233—55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

Edwards, D. (2000) `Extreme Case Formulations: Softeners, Investment, and Doing Nonliteral' , Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4): 347—73.

Günthner, S. (2000) Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Grammatische, prosodische, rhetorisch-stilistische und interactive Verfahren bei der Konstitution kommunikativer Muster und Gattungen [Accusations in Everyday Interaction. Grammatical, Prosodical, Rhetorical-stylistic and Interactive Method of Classification of Communication Structures]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

10.

Hakulinen, A. (1998) `The Use of Finnish Nyt as a Discourse Particle' , in A.H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds) Discourse Markers. Descriptions and Theory, pp. 83—96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

11.

Heinemann, T. (2006) ```Will You or Can't You?'' Displaying Entitlement in Interrogative Questions' , Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1081—104.

12.

Keisanen, T. (2006) Negative Yes/No Interrogatives and Tag Questions in American English Conversation. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Humaniora B71. Oulu University Press of Oulu .

13.

Koshik, I. (2005) Beyond Rhetorical Questions. Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

14.

Laitinen, L. (2006) `Zero Person in Finnish: A Grammatical Resource for Construing Human Reference', in M.-L. Helasvuo and L. Campbell (eds) Grammar from the Human Perspective. Case, Space and Person in Finnish , pp. 209—31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

15.

Lappalainen, H. (2004) Variaatio ja sen funktiot. Erään sosiaalisen verkoston jäsenten kielellisen variaation ja vuorovaikutuksen tarkastelua. [English abstract: Variation and Its Functions. The Analysis of Linguistic Variation and Interaction among Members of a Social Network]. Helsinki : Finnish Literature Society.

16.

Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Volume II, ed. G. Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.

17.

Silenti, V. (2000) `Erimielisyyssekvenssin rakentuminen' [`Construction of Disagreement Sequences'], MA thesis, Department of Finnish Language and Literature, University of Helsinki .

18.

Sorjonen, M. -L. (2001) Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Using niin -interrogative to treat the prior speaker's action as an exaggeration

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References