Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article attempts to account for some conversational strategies for the thematic construction of discourse in a 30,000 word corpus of contemporary oral French. The sub-genre studied is that of the ‘memory-activation interview’, a speech situation, or ‘activity-type’ (Levinson, 1992) in which dialogues and meaning are co-constructed with the purpose of reviving memories. The general analytical framework is that of ‘interactional sociolinguistics’ as defined by Schiffrin (1998), in which the more specific aspects of ratification, legitimization and modes of contribution are redefined and diversified. Also central in the memory-activation process is the interviewer%'s role which, although not of a therapeutical nature (the interviewees suffer no particular memory impairments) is shown as being fully involved both at macro- (organizational) and micro- (interlocutive and turn-taking) levels. The article also tries to widen the range of the currently available tools for the analysis of speech seen as a thematic–rhematic process through the alternation of speech turns. The notion of thematic-discursive perimeter is introduced to account for thematic consistency.

Keywords

co-construction of meaning co-operation dialogism ratification rhematic topic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akatsuka, N. (1997) ‘On the Co-Construction of the Counterfactual Reasoning’ ,Journal of Pragmatics 28: 781–794 .

Attardo, S. (1997) ‘Locutionary and Perlocutionary Co-operation: The Perlocutionary Co-operative Principle’ , Journal of Pragmatics 27: 753–779 .

Berthoud, A.-C. (1996) Paroles à Propos. Approche énonciative et Interactive du Topic. Paris: Ophrys .

Chabrol, C. and Camus-Malavergne, O. (1989) ‘Co-opération et Analyse des Conversations’ , Connexions 53(1): 39–68 .

Chafe, W. (1987) ‘Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow’, in R.S. Tomlin (ed.) Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, pp. 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

Chafe, W. (2001) ‘The Analysis of Discourse Flow’, in D. Schiffrin et al. (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 673–687. Oxford: Blackwell .

Charaudeau, P. (ed.) (1989) La Télévision. Les Débats Culturels «Apostrophes», Coll. «Langages, Discours et Sociétés», No. 7. Paris: Didier Erudition .

Clark, H.H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Croll, A. (1993) ‘La Construction de L'information dans les Conversations Médiatiques’, in C. Chabrol (ed.) Débats Médiatiques: Stratégies à Oublier?, Tome 38–2, pp. 126–141. Paris: Psychologie Française .

10.

Croll, A. and Claquin, F. (1997) ‘La Co-Construction Thématique dans le Dialogue Télévisuel’ , in Dialogue Analysis V. Proceedings of the 5th Conference Paris 1994, pp. 225–235 . Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

11.

Croll, A. and Gormati, Y. (1991) ‘La construction du rituel: le jeu de régulation de la parole’, in P. Charaudeau (ed.) La Télévision. Les Débats Culturels « Apostrophes », Coll. «Langages, Discours et Sociétés», No. 7, pp. 40–49. Paris: Didier Erudition .

12.

De Nucheze, V. (1998) Sous le Discours, L'interaction. Paris: l'Harmattan .

13.

Garcia-Debanc, C. (1991) ‘Interaction et Construction de la Signification dans les Discussion Orales’ , Connexions 57(1): 97–106 .

14.

Givon, T. (1983) Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .

15.

Grobet, A. (2002)L'identification des Topiques dans les Dialogues. Brussels: De Boeck-Duculot .

16.

Gumperz, J. (1972) ‘Introduction’, in J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, pp. 1–31. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston .

17.

Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

18.

Hymes, D. (1972) ‘Models of the Interaction of Language and Social Life’, in J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, pp. 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston .

19.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990) Les Interactions Verbales, Tome 3. Paris: A. Colin .

20.

Laurendeau, P. (1999) ‘Thématisation et Stabilisation Notionnelle en Co-énonciation Parlée’, in C. Guimier (ed.) La Thématisation dans les Langues. Actes du Colloque de Caen 1997, pp. 421–437. Paris: Peter Lang .

21.

Levinson, S. (1992) ‘Activity Types and Language’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work, pp. 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

22.

Schiffrin, D. (1998) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell .

23.

van Dijk, T.A. (1980) Macrostructures. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

24.

van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press, New York .

25.

Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1997) ‘Studying Language Use as Collaboration’, in G. Kasper and E. Kellerman (eds) Communication Strategies. Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives, pp. 238–270. New York: Longman .

26.

Zenone, A. (1981) ‘Interactivité, Relations entre Interlocuteurs et Constitution D'unités Conversationnelles’ , Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée 44: 70–87 .

Activating memories in interviews: an instance of collaborative discourse construction

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References