This article explores the contributions that five different approaches to discourse analysis can make to interpreting and understanding the same piece of data. Conversation analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, politeness theory, critical discourse analysis, and discursive psychology are the approaches chosen for comparison. The data is a nine-minute audio recording of a spontaneous workplace interaction. The analyses are compared, and the theoretical and methodological implications of the different approaches are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978) `Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena', in E.N. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness, pp. 56-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
2.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987 [1978]) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Selting, M. (eds) (1996) Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
4.
Edelsky, C. (1981) `Who's Got the Floor?' , Language in Society10: 383-421 .
5.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage .
6.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman .
7.
Gill, R. (1993) `Justifying Injustice: Broadcasters' Accounts of Inequality in Radio', in E. Burman and I. Parker (eds) Discourse Analytic Research, pp. 75-93. London: Routledge .
8.
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behaviour. New York: Anchor Books .
9.
Gough, B. (1998) `Men and the Discursive Reproduction of Sexism: Repertoires of Difference and Equality' , Feminism and Psychology8: 25-49 .
10.
Gumperz, J.J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Gumperz, J.J. (1992) `Interviewing in Intercultural Situations', in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, pp. 302-307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
12.
Gumperz, J.J. (1999) `On Interactional Sociolinguistic Method', in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds) Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, pp. 453-471. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
13.
Heritage, J. (1984) `Conversation Analysis', in J. Heritage (ed.) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, pp. 233-292. Cambridge: Polity Press .
14.
Holmes, J. (2000) `Women at Work: Analysing Women's Talk in New Zealand Workplaces' , Australian Association of Applied Linguistics22, 2: 1-17 .
15.
Holmes, J., Stubbe, M. and Vine, B. (1999) `Constructing Professional Identity: `Doing Power' in Policy Units', in S. Sarangi and C. Roberts (eds) Talk, Walk and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, pp. 351-385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
16.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1998) Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press .
17.
Kress, G. (1990) `Critical Discourse Analysis' , Annual Review of Applied Linguistics11: 84-99 .
18.
Levinson, S.C. (1983) `Conversational Structure', in S.C. Levinson (ed.) Pragmatics, pp. 284-370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
19.
Morand, D.A. (1996) `Dominance, Deference, and Egalitarianism in Organizational Interaction: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Power and Politeness' , Organization Science7, 5: 544-556 .
20.
Nikander, P. (1995) `The Turn to the Text: The Critical Potential of Discursive Social Psychology' , Nordiske Udkast2: 3-15 .
21.
Paltridge, B. (2000) Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Gold Coast, Australia: Antipodean Educational Enterprise .
22.
Pomerantz, A. and Fehr, B.J. (1997) `Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices', in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 64-91. London: Sage .
23.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage .
24.
Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
25.
Roberts, C., Davies, E. and Jupp, T. (1992) Language and Discrimination: A Study of Communication in Multi-ethnic Workplaces. London: Longman .
26.
Sacks, H. (1984) `Notes on methodology', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 21-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
27.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation (G. Jefferson ed.) 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell .
28.
Schegloff, E.A. (1993) `Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation' , Research on Language and Social Interaction26, 1: 99-128 .
29.
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell .
30.
Schiffrin, D. (1996) `Interactional Sociolinguistics', in S.L. McKay and N.H. Hornberger (eds) Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching, pp. 307-328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
31.
Sollitt-Morris, L. (1996) `Language, Gender and Power Relationships: The Enactment of Repressive Discourse in Staff Meetings of Two Subject Departments in a New Zealand Secondary School', unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
32.
ten Have, P. (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage .
33.
Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction. New York: Longman .
34.
Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage .
35.
van Dijk, T.A. (1998) `Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis', in J. Cheshire and P. Trudgill (eds) The Sociolinguistics Reader Volume 2: Gender and Discourse, pp. 367-391. London: Arnold .
36.
van Dijk, T.A. (1999) `Editorial: Critical Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis' , Discourse and Society10, 4: 459-460 .
37.
Wetherell, M., Stiven, H. and Potter, J. (1987) `Unequal Egalitarianism: A Preliminary Study of Discourses and Employment Opportunities' , British Journal of Social Psychology26: 59-71 .
38.
Wieder, D.L. (ed.) (1993) `On the Compound Questions Raised by Attempts to Quantify Conversation Analysis' Phenomena' , Special issue: Research on Language and Social Interaction26, 2: 151-226 .
