This article examines how far-right communication on Instagram uses positively valenced affect and humour to normalise extremist worldviews. Drawing on research on mainstreaming, memetic communication and affective publics, it conceptualises far-right Instagram as an affective–discursive ecology where ideology, emotion and platform logics intersect. Through algorithmic ethnography and multimodal discourse analysis, the study analyses 2603 Reels featuring far-right adjacent themes. The analysis identifies three overlapping modalities: (1) humorous, ironic and meta-reflexive content, framing extremity as playful or self-aware; (2) wholesome and nostalgic aestheticisation that softens exclusionary messaging through sentimental imagery; and (3) inspirational, glorifying and aspirational aestheticisation, casting ideological commitment as awakening or heroic civilisational defence. Algorithmic clustering further politicises ostensibly non-political material, allowing neutral or unrelated posts to reinforce far-right narratives through contextual adjacency. The study argues that effective responses must address these emotional, aesthetic and infrastructural conditions.
Abou-ChadiT (2024) A gendered far-right wave among young voters in Western Europe?European Journal of Politics and Gender. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1332/25151088Y2024D000000065
2.
AhmedS (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
AlbertazziDBonansingaD (2024) Beyond anger: the populist radical right on TikTok. Journal of Contemporary European Studies32(3): 673–689.
Association of Internet Researchers (2025) Risky research: an AoIR guide to researcher protection and safety (Working Group Report). AoIR. Available at: https://aoir.org/riskyresearchguide/
6.
AwadSDoerrNNissenA (2022) Far-right boundary construction towards the ‘other’: visual communication of Danish People’s party on social media. The British Journal of Sociology73(5): 1123–1141.
7.
BerntzenL E (2020) Liberal Roots of Far Right Activism: The Anti-Islamic Movement in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
8.
Bolaños SomoanoI (2022) The right-leaning be memeing: extremist uses of Internet memes and insights for CVE design. First Monday27(5). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v27i5.12601.
9.
BrownK (2024) Researching the far right: towards an ethics of talking ‘about’. In: BrownKVaughanABrauneJet al. (eds) The Ethics of Researching the Far Right. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 379–390.
10.
ChristinA (2020) Algorithmic ethnography, during and after COVID-19. Communication and the Public5(4): 1–4.
11.
CollinsJ (2024) More than meets the reply: Examining emotional belonging in far-right social media space. Social Media + Society10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241274665
12.
DarwishM (2024) Fascism, nature and communication: a discursive-affective analysis of cuteness in eco-fascist propaganda. Feminist Media Studies25(2): 443–463.
13.
DeCookJ (2018) Memes and symbolic violence: #ProudBoys and the use of memes for propaganda and the construction of collective identity. Learning, Media and Technology43(4): 485–504.
14.
DeVriesM (2021) Mobilized but not (yet) recruited: the case of the collective avatar. In: DeVriesMBessantJWattsR (eds) The Rise of the Far-Right: Technologies of Recruitment and Mobilization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 211–230.
15.
DeVriesMBessantJWattsR (eds) (2021) The Rise of the Far-Right: Technologies of Recruitment and Mobilization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
EriksenTH (2016) Overheating: An Anthropology of Accelerated Change. Pluto Press.
17.
FrindteW (2025) Rezension: Quent, Matthias & Virchow, Fabian (Hrsg.) (2024): Rechtsextrem, das neue Normal? Die AfD zwischen Verbot und Machtübernahme. ZRex – Zeitschrift für Rechtsextremismusforschung5(2): 328–330.
18.
FrischlichL (2021) #Dark inspiration: Eudaimonic entertainment in extremist Instagram posts. New Media & Society23(3): 554–577.
GreeneVS (2019) “Deplorable” satire: Alt-right memes, white genocide tweets, and redpilling normies. Studies in American Humor5(1): 31–69. https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031
21.
GrzenkowiczMWildfeuerJ (2025) Addressing Tiktok’s multimodal complexity: a multi-level annotation scheme for the audio-visual design of short video content. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities40(4): 1143–1166.
22.
HakoköngäsEHalmesvaaraOSakkiI (2020) Persuasion through bitter humor: multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media + Society6(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305120921578.
23.
HanJZappavignaM (2023) Multimodal rhythm in TikTok videos: Exploring a recontextualization of the Gillard ‘misogyny speech’. Multimodality & Society4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231207228
24.
HumphreyABliucA-M (2022) Western individualism and the psychological wellbeing of young people: a systematic review of their associations. Youth2(1): 1–11.
25.
KeenanD (2020) DON’T LET YOUR MEMES BE DREAMS! how the alt-right uses memes to build and further their dangerous reach online. Undergraduate Thesis, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ. Available at: https://wpunj.edu
26.
KressGR (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
27.
LamerichsNNguyenDSmeetsJ, et al. (2018) Elite male bodies: the circulation of alt-right memes and the framing of politicians on social media. Participations15(1): 180–206.
28.
LamourC (2020) The league of leagues: meta-populism and the ‘chain of equivalence’ in a crossborder Alpine area. Political Geography81: 102207.
LimM (2020) Algorithmic enclaves: affective politics and algorithms in the neoliberal social media landscape. In: BolerMDavisE (eds) Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means. London: Routledge, pp. 186–203.
31.
McSwineyJSengulK (2024) Humor, ridicule, and the far right: mainstreaming exclusion through online animation. Television & New Media25(4): 315–333.
32.
McSwineyJVaughanMHeftA, et al. (2021) Sharing the hate? Memes and transnationality in the far right’s digital visual culture. Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2502–2521.
33.
Miller-IdrissC (2020) Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Moreno-AlmeidaCGerbaudoP (2021) Memes and the Moroccan far-right. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(4): 882–906.
35.
MüllerMG (2011) Iconography and iconology as a visual method and approach. In: MargolisEPauwelsL (eds) The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. Sage, pp. 283–297.
36.
MungerKLiV (2025) Thirst traps and quick cuts: the effects of TikTok ‘edits’ on evaluations of politicians. Social Media + Society11(2). DOI: 10.1177/20563051251329990.
37.
NagleA (2017) Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Zero Books.
PauwelsL (2019) Reframing visual social media. Visual Communication18(2): 131–156.
43.
PetersenLNJohansenMB (2025) Spaces of hybridized prefatory extremism (HYPE) on social media. Social Media + Society11(2). DOI: 10.1177/20563051251340145.
44.
PfundmairMWoodNRHalesA, et al. (2022) How social exclusion makes radicalism flourish: a review of empirical evidence. Journal of Social Issues78(2): 297–316.
45.
Pichel-VázquezAEnguix GrauB (2021) Framing gender through affects: Antifeminism and love in the Spanish far right (Vox). South European Society and Politics26(4): 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2022.2115185
46.
PirroALP (2022) Far right: the significance of an umbrella concept. Nations and Nationalism28(4): 1143–1160.
47.
RasmussenMB (2021) Late capitalist Fascism. Polity Press.
48.
RothutSSchulzeHRiegerD, et al. (2024) Mainstreaming as a meta-process: a systematic review and conceptual model of factors contributing to the mainstreaming of radical and extremist positions. Communication Theory34: 49–59.
49.
SchmidUKSchulzeHDrexelA (2024) Memes, humor, and the far right’s strategic mainstreaming. Information, Communication & Society28(4): 537–556.
50.
ShifmanL (2013) Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
51.
TebaldiCPlumA (2024) Granola Nazis and Hyperborean Heroes: A critical mixed methods analysis of folkish Instagram [Preprint]. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5021444.
52.
TymińskaA (2022) Zarządzanie strachem czy racjonalnością? Antyuchodźcza mowa nienawiści na granicy polsko-białoruskiej [Managing fear or rationality? Anti-refugee hate speech on the Polish-Belarusian border]. Kwartalnik Trzeci Sektor59–60(3–4): Article2.
53.
UyhengJBelluttaDCarleyKM (2022) Bots amplify and redirect hate speech in online discourse about racism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Media + Society8(3). DOI: 10.1177/20563051221104749
54.
VaughanA (2025) Principle versus practice: the institutionalisation of ethics and research on the far right. International Journal of Social Research Methodology28(1): 29–42.
55.
VaughanATinsleyMMondonA, et al. (2024) The Ethics of Researching the Far Right: Critical Approaches and Reflections. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
56.
WilsonJG (2018) Youth consumer practices and social alienation. In: BurnsDJ (ed.) Multifaceted Explorations of Consumer Culture and Its Impact on Individuals and Society. IGI Global, pp. 96–113.
57.
WoodsHSHahnerLA (2019) Make America Meme Again: The Rhetoric of the Alt-Right. Lausanne: Peter Lang.
