This study, one of the first cross-national and cross-professional approaches, maps Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption and perceptions through a survey of 797 professionals in eight countries (Spain, Italy, France, Portugal, Netherlands, Germany, Norway, and Denmark) spanning six fields including journalism, marketing, audiovisual, public relations, graphic design, and communication education. Experimentation is widespread (88%), yet workflow integration remains uneven. Adoption is strongest among younger professionals, and sectoral differences are detected: marketing reports higher adoption, whereas journalists and educators report the lowest usage. ChatGPT dominates (77%), followed by Canva (38%), and DALL·E and MidJourney (27%). Frequency of use lag behind positive attitudes. National patterns also diverge, reflecting cultural, regulatory, and market factors. Results draw on SCOT, Rogers’ diffusion, and Bozdag’s AImosis to frame sociotechnical adoption of AI as a negotiation. We offer a baseline of AI practices in European communication professions and identify key priorities in policy.
Akmeraner-KökatYPellandini-SimányiL (2025) Creativity re-distributed: how digitalisation changes creative advertising practice. Journal of Marketing Management41(15–16): 1731–1753.
2.
ArrojoMJ (2025) Impact of artificial intelligence in the audiovisual industry. A taxonomy of uses and applications. In: BarredoDGallardo-EcheniqueESiringoringoH, et al. (eds) Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Berlin: Springer, pp. 183–194.
3.
BijkerWHughesTPinchT (2012) The Social Construction of Technical Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BozdagA (2023) AIsmosis and the pas de deux of human-AI interaction: exploring the communicative dance between society and artificial intelligence. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies13(4): e202340.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
6.
BrightJChambersDSandfordA (2024) Generative AI is already widespread in the public sector. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01291
7.
Celis BuenoCChowPSPopowiczA (2025) Not “what”, but “where is creativity?”: towards a relational-materialist approach to generative AI. AI & Society40: 339-351. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01921-3
8.
ChowPSCelis BuenoC (2025) The cloak of creativity: AI imaginaries and creative labour in media production. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Epub ahead of print 13 March. DOI: 10.1177/13675494251322991.
9.
CoolsHde VreeseCH (2025) From automation to transformation with AI-tools: exploring the professional norms and the perceptions of responsible AI in a news organization. Digital Journalism. Epub ahead of print 17 May. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2025.2505982.
10.
De-Lima-SantosMFYeungWNDoddsT (2024) Guiding the way: a comprehensive examination of AI guidelines in global media. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04706.
FerrariFVan DijckJVan den BoschA (2023) Observe, inspect, modify: three conditions for generative AI governance. New Media & Society27(5): 2788–2806.
13.
FloreaRCroitoruC (2025) The impact of artificial intelligence on communication dynamics and performance in organizational leadership. Administrative Sciences15(2): 33.
14.
GoloujehAMSullivanAMagerkoB (2024) The social construction of generative AI prompts. In: CHI EA ‘24: Extended abstracts of the ACM CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Honolulu, HI, 11–16 May, pp. 1–7. New York: ACM.
15.
GrodalSHaJHoodE, et al. (2024) Between humans and machines: the social construction of the generative AI category. Organization Theory5(3): 26317877241275125.
16.
GutiérrezJLM (2024) On actor-network theory and algorithms: ChatGPT and the new power relationships in the age of AI. AI Ethics4: 1071–1084.
17.
HabermasJ (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System, a Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
HollanekTPetersDDrageE, et al. (2025) AI, journalism, and critical AI literacy: exploring journalists’ perspectives on AI and responsible reporting. AI & Society40: 6393–6405.
20.
KaclovaM (2025) Exploring the landscape: generative AI adoption among central and eastern European PR professionals. International Journal of Strategic Communication19(2): 1–16.
21.
KacperskaEMStefancyzkJDabrowskiP, et al. (2024) The consequences of implementing artificial intelligence technology in the digital economy from the perspective of generation Z. European Research Studies Journal XXVII(3): 1039–1057.
22.
KellyK (2010) What Technology Wants. New York: Viking Press.
23.
KellyK (2017) The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future. New York: Penguin Books.
24.
KuziemskiMMisuracaG (2020) AI governance in the public sector: three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy44(6): 1–13.
25.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
LawJHassardJ (1999) Actor Network Theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
LeeMKKusbitDMetskyE, et al. (2015) Working with machines: the impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18–23 April, pp. 1603–1612. New York: ACM.
28.
LievrouwLA (2014) Materiality and media in communication and technology studies. In: GillespieTBoczkowskiPJFootKA (eds) Media Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 21–52.
29.
LovariADe RosaM (2025) Exploring the challenges of generative AI on public sector communication in Europe. Media and Communication13(2): 1–24.
30.
MacKenzieDWajcmanJ (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
31.
MøllerLAVan DalenASkovsgaardM (2025) A little of that human touch: how regular journalists redefine their expertise in the face of artificial intelligence. Journalism Studies26(1): 84–100.
32.
NataleSBiggioFGuzmanAL, et al. (2025) AI, agency, and power geometries. Media, Culture & Society47(5): 1057–1073.
33.
NewmanN (2024) Journalism, Media, and Technology Trends and Predictions 2024. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
34.
OhSJungJ (2025) Harmonizing traditional journalistic values with emerging AI technologies: a systematic review of journalists’ perception. Media and Communication13: 1–27.
35.
PetriglieriJL (2011) Under threat: responses to the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review36(4): 641–662.
36.
PinchTJBijkerWE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science14(3): 399–441.
37.
RadcliffeD (2025) Journalism in the AI Era: Opportunities and Challenges in the Global South and Emerging Economies. London: Thomson Reuters Foundation.
38.
RogersEM (2003 [1963]) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
39.
Salvador-MataBCuartiellesROkanY (2025) The “wait-and-see” approach to AI: how Spanish journalists perceive automation and its impact on newsrooms. Journalism Practice. Epub ahead of print 30 December. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2025.2610285.
40.
ScantamburloTDutkiewicz MacnishŁKFloridiL (2023) Artificial intelligence across Europe: a study on awareness, attitude and trust. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.09979
41.
SelenkoECredéMHartner-TiefenthalerM, et al. (2022) How artificial intelligence might affect the future of work and work-related identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science31(3): 248–254.
42.
SimonFM (2025) Rationalisation of the news: how AI reshapes and retools the gatekeeping processes of news organisations in the United Kingdom, United States and Germany. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 8 May. DOI: 10.1177/14614448251336423.
43.
VeblenT (1904) The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
