The recent global rise of far-right ideologies has been accompanied by the normalization of these ideas in online communication. However, little is known about the strategies employed by the far right to drive this trend, particularly outside Western countries and major platforms. This study addresses these gaps by conducting a systematic content analysis of far-right content on VK (VKontakte), the most widely used Russian social network, to examine the content’s characteristics that facilitate the mainstreaming of the far right. Findings indicate that far-right actors leverage agenda-setting mechanisms and adopt news-like formats to embed xenophobic and exclusionary narratives within the broader mainstream Russian discourse. This study contributes to research on far-right content-related strategies and the interplay between non-Western contexts, digital affordances, and far-right communication in less regulated online spaces.
BaeleSJBoydKCoanTG, et al. (2023) Lethal words: an integrated model of violent extremists’ language. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Epub ahead of print 23 May 2023. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2023.2213963.
4.
BarnettDEBliucAMCristeaM (2025) Far-right narratives of online groups: a systematic review of recent cross-disciplinary research. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology31(3): 259–274.
5.
BaugutPNeumannK (2019) How right-wing extremists use and perceive news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96(3): 696–720.
6.
Bennett FurlowRGoodallHLJr (2011) The war of ideas and the battle of narratives: a comparison of extremist storytelling structures. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies11(3): 215–223.
7.
BergerJM (2017) Extremist construction of identity. How escalating demands for legitimacy shape and define in-group and out-group dynamics. ICCT Research Paper, 21April. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19165/2017.1.07
8.
BieberF (2022) Global nationalism in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nationalities Papers50(1): 13–25.
9.
BliucAMFaulknerNJakubowiczA, et al. (2018) Online networks of racial hate: a systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism. Computers in Human Behavior87: 75–86.
10.
BobbioN (1997) Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
BorgesonKValeriR (2004) Faces of hate. Journal of Applied Sociology21(2): 99–111.
12.
BoussalisCCraigCRudkinAF (2025) Collective victimhood narratives in far-right communities on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society28: 1407–1424.
13.
BreezeR (2022) Performing right-wing political identities on reader comments pages. Pragmatics & Society13(1): 85–106.
14.
BrewerMB (1999) The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues55(3): 429–444.
15.
BrownKMondonAWinterA (2023) The far right, the mainstream and mainstreaming: towards a heuristic framework. Journal of Political Ideologies28(2): 162–179.
CastleTParsonsT (2019) Vigilante or viking? Contesting the mediated constructions of soldiers of Odin Norge. Crime, Media, Culture15(1): 47–66.
18.
Chris HaleW (2012) Extremism on the World Wide Web: a research review. Criminal Justice Studies25(4): 343–356.
19.
ClausRVirchowF (2017) The far right’s ideological constructions of “deviant” male sexualities. In: KöttigMBitzanRPetöA (eds) Gender and Far-right Politics in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 305–319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43533-6_20
20.
ConwayM (2020) Routing the extreme right: challenges for social media platforms. The RUSI Journal165(1): 108–113.
21.
EkmanM (2022) The great replacement: strategic mainstreaming of far-right conspiracy claims. Convergence28(4): 1127–1143.
22.
EssexJ (2024) The kids are not alright: children as objects, audience, and agents in the 2022 Canadian convoy protests. Canadian Geographies/Géographies canadiennes68(3): 418–429.
23.
FischerVO’MaraSM (2023) “They deserve it for what they’re doing”: dehumanising rhetoric as a facilitator of the recourse to violence against the defenceless. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences51: 101280.
24.
FrenguelliN (2024) The construction of masculinity in far-right attacker manifestos in the West: the reification of hegemonic masculinity and the use of “the child” to mobilize others. Critical Studies on Terrorism17(3): 708–731.
25.
FroioC (2018) Race, religion, or culture? Framing Islam between racism and neo-racism in the online network of the French far right. Perspectives on Politics16(3): 696–709.
26.
GarapichMPJochymekASoborskiR (2024) Immigrants in the transnational far right: integration through racisms and negotiating white supremacy in a migratory context. International Migration Review58(4): 2012–2039.
27.
GiavazziFIglhautFLemoliG, et al. (2024) Terrorist attacks, cultural incidents, and the vote for radical parties: analyzing text from Twitter. American Journal of Political Science68(3): 1002–1021.
28.
GorodzeiskyA (2018) Opposition to immigration in contemporary Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs35(3): 205–222.
29.
GudkovL (2004) Negativnaia identichnost’ [Negative identity]. Moscow: New Literature Review.
30.
HalversonJRGoodallHLCormanSR (2011) Master narratives and strategic communication. In: HalversonJRGoodallHLCormanSR (eds) Master Narratives of Islamist Extremism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 179–205.
HammerDMatlachPGersterL, et al. (2022) Escape Routes—How Germany’s Network Enforcement Act Is Circumvented on Established Social Media Platforms Through the Posting of Links to Alternative Platforms. Berlin: Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
33.
HutchinsonJDrooganJ (2024) Far-right “reactions”: a comparison of Australian and Canadian far-right extremist groups on Facebook. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism & Political Aggression16(3): 352–379.
KakavandAE (2024) Far-right social media communication in the light of technology affordances: a systematic literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association48(1): 37–56.
36.
KarpovaASavelevAVilninA, et al. (2022) Method for detecting far-right extremist communities on social media. Social Sciences11(5): 200.
37.
KleinOMuisJ (2019) Online discontent: comparing Western European far-right groups on Facebook. European Societies21(4): 540–562.
KrämerB (2017) Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism. Information, Communication & Society20(9): 1293–1309.
40.
KruglanskiAWJaskoKWebberD, et al. (2018) The making of violent extremists. Review of General Psychology22(1): 107–120.
41.
KundnaniA (2012) Blind spot? Security narratives and far-right violence in Europe. Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism Studies3: 1–37.
42.
LaruelleM (2019) Russian Nationalism: Imaginaries, Doctrines, and Political Battlefields. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429426773
43.
LeahyRRestrepoNJSearR, et al. (2022) Connectivity between Russian information sources and extremist communities across social media platforms. Frontiers in Political Science4: 885362.
44.
LikhachevaAMakarovIMakarovaE (2015) Post-Soviet Russian identity and its influence on European-Russian relations. European Journal of Futures Research3(1): 4.
45.
LucassenGLubbersM (2012) Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threats. Comparative Political Studies45(5): 547–574.
46.
MacdonaldSYilmazKHerathC, et al. (2022) The European far-right online: an exploratory Twitter outlink analysis of German & French far-right online ecosystems. RESOLVE Network. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37805/remve2022.2
47.
McSwineyJSengulK (2024) Humor, ridicule, and the far right: mainstreaming exclusion through online animation. Television & New Media25(4): 315–333.
48.
MarcksHPawelzJ (2022) From myths of victimhood to fantasies of violence: how far-right narratives of imperilment work. Terrorism & Political Violence34(7): 1415–1432.
49.
MarwickAClancyBFurlK (2022) Far-right online radicalization: a review of the literature. The Bulletin of Technology & Public Life, 10May. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21428/bfcb0bff.e9492a11
50.
MichaelG (2019) Useful Idiots or Fellow Travelers? The Relationship between the American Far Right and Russia. Terrorism and Political Violence31(1): 64–83.
51.
MiletskiyVPisarevaA (2019) Problems of social network institutionalization in modern Russia as exemplified by Vkontakte social network. In: International Conference on Communicative Strategies of Information Society(CSIS 2018). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, pp. 400–402. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/csis-18.2019.81
52.
MuddeC (2019) The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MyagkovMShchekotinEChudinovS, et al. (2019) A comparative analysis of right-wing radical and Islamist communities’ strategies for survival in social networks (evidence from the Russian social network VKontakte). Media, War & Conflict13(4): 425–447.
55.
ObaidiMKunstJROzerS, et al. (2022) The “great replacement” conspiracy: how the perceived ousting of Whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations25(7): 1675–1695.
PatersonIKaryotisG (2022) “We are, by nature, a tolerant people”: securitisation and counter-securitisation in UK migration politics. International Relations36(1): 104–126.
PeroccoFDella PuppaF (2023) The racialized welfare discourse on refugees and asylum seekers: the example of “scroungers” in Italy. Social Sciences12(2): 59.
63.
PerryB (2022) Blurring the boundaries of mainstream and extreme: contexts and contours of right-wing extremism in Canada. In: PerryBGruenewaldJScrivensR (eds) Right-Wing Extremism in Canada and the United States. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 49–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99804-2_3
64.
PeuckerMFisherTJ (2023) Mainstream media use for far-right mobilisation on the alt-tech online platform Gab. Media, Culture & Society45(2): 354–372.
65.
PurdueSA (2022) Useful victims: symbolic rage and racist violence on the global extreme-right. In: PurdueSA (ed.) Race, Gender and Violence on the Transatlantic Extreme Right, 1969–2009: Intersectional Hate. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 55–79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13889-8_3
RekawekKRenardTMolasB (eds) (2024) Russia and the Far-Right: Insights from Ten European Countries. ICCT Press.
68.
RiegerDKümpelASWichM, et al. (2021) Assessing the extent and types of hate speech in fringe communities: a case study of alt-right communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit. Social Media + Society7(4): 1–14.
69.
RothutSSchulzeHRiegerD, et al. (2024) Mainstreaming as a meta-process: a systematic review and conceptual model of factors contributing to the mainstreaming of radical and extremist positions. Communication Theory34(2): 49–59.
70.
RousisGJRichardFDWangDYD (2022) The truth is out there: the prevalence of conspiracy theory use by radical violent extremist organizations. Terrorism & Political Violence34(8): 1739–1757.
71.
RyanJDowningBWilliamsHJ, et al. (2021) The Online Extremist Ecosystem: Its Evolution and a Framework for Separating Extreme from Mainstream. RAND Perspectives (PE-A1458-1). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7249/PEA1458-1
72.
SaucierGAkersLGShen -MillerS, et al. (2009) Patterns of thinking in militant extremism. Perspectives on Psychological Science4(3): 256–271.
73.
SchmidUK (2023) Humorous hate speech on social media: a mixed-methods investigation of users’ perceptions and processing of hateful memes. New Media & Society27(3): 1588–1606.
74.
SchmidUKSchulzeHDrexelA (2025) Memes, humor, and the far right’s strategic mainstreaming. Information, Communication & Society28(4): 537–556.
75.
SchulzeHHohnerJGreiplS, et al. (2022) Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: a longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on Telegram. Convergence28(4): 1103–1126.
76.
SchwemmerC (2021) The limited influence of right-wing movements on social media user engagement. Social Media + Society7(3): 1–13.
77.
SedgwickM (2024) The great replacement narrative: fear, anxiety and loathing across the West. Politics, Religion & Ideology25(4): 548–562.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47.
TolzV (1998) Forging the nation: national identity and nation building in post-communist Russia. Europe-Asia Studies50(6): 993–1022.
82.
TörnbergAWahlströmM (2018) Unveiling the radical right online: exploring framing and identity in an online anti-immigrant discussion group. Sociologisk Forskning55: 267–292.
83.
UrmanA (2019) News consumption of Russian Vkontakte users: polarization and news avoidance. International Journal of Communication 13: 5158–5182. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11161
84.
UrnovM (2014) “Greatpowerness” as the key element of Russian self-consciousness under erosion. Communist and Post-Communist Studies47(3–4): 305–322.
VerkhovskyA (2024b) Who are you? Russians? Metamorphoses of post-Soviet Russian nationalism: less violence, more “binding.” Resentment is inevitable. Novaya Gazeta, 13September. Available at: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2024/09/13/kto-vy-russkie
VolkSWeisskircherM (2023) Far-right PEGIDA: non-violent protest and the blurred lines between the radical and extreme right. In: OrofinoEAllchornW (eds) Routledge Handbook of Non-violent Extremism. London: Routledge, pp. 322–333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003032793-25
90.
VoskresenskiiV (2023) Migrating counterpublics: German far-right online groups on Russian social media. International Journal of Communication17: 926–946.
91.
WahlströmMTörnbergAEkbrandH (2021) Dynamics of violent and dehumanizing rhetoric in far-right social media. New Media & Society23(11): 3290–3311.
92.
WaltherSMcCoyA (2021) US extremism on Telegram: fueling disinformation, conspiracy theories, and accelerationism. Perspectives on Terrorism15(2): 100–124. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27007298
93.
WeimannGMasriN (2021) TikTok’s spiral of antisemitism. Journalism and Media2(4): 697–708.
94.
WodakR (2021) The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-right Discourse. 2nd ed. London: Sage. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664
95.
YankovskiyRM (2017) Social media user rights and their protection under Russian law. In: AfanasievaEG (ed.) Intellectual Property Law: Collection of Studies. Moscow: Moscow State University, pp. 119–131. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3633232
ZlokazovKVRozhkovAA (2020) Extremist concepts and their lexical features: empirical research. Political Linguistics1(79): 97–103.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
