Intimate artificial intelligence requires secure data privacy to protect users’ freedom of expression and sexual privacy. This article uses critical political economy theory to evaluate the privacy and platformization of RealDoll’s sex robot. A critical discourse analysis of 496 artifacts collected from RealDoll revealed a lack of transparent data procedures. While regulation is a significant point of tension in the sex robot industry, without government oversight, the issue remains a discursive strategy to debate the rationale of sex robots at large. Data also shows corporate stakeholders’ interest in expanding beyond the sex industry into the technology sector, viewing their robot as a platform with general applications. This research adds to institutional critical studies on AI privacy and the regulation of sexual products.
BendelO (2021) Love dolls and sex robots in unproven and unexplored fields of application. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics12(1): 1–12.
9.
BergH (2016) ‘A scene is just a marketing tool’: alternative income streams in porn’s gig economy. Porn Studies3(2): 160–174.
10.
BojovicNGarudRChededM (2025) The body as a cultural resource for entrepreneurs in stigmatized settings: the case of sex toys by women for women. Journal of Business Venturing40(1): 106449.
11.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
CaloMR (2017) Robots and privacy. In: WallachWAsaroP (eds) Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics. London: Routledge, pp. 491–506.
14.
CaloR (2010) Robots and privacy. In: LinPAbneyKBekeyGA (eds) Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 187–201.
15.
Chabot JaworskiÉERenaudP (2024) Pervasive teledildonics: how AI aims to impact human sexuality. In: 2024 IEEE/WIC international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology (WI-IAT), Bangkok, Thailand, 9–12 December, pp. 898–903. New York: IEEE.
16.
ChatterjeeBB (2020) Child sex dolls and robots: challenging the boundaries of the child protection framework. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology34(1): 22–43.
ClementW (2001) Canadian political economy’s legacy for sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology26(3): 405–420.
19.
CohenS (2002) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. 3rd ed.London: Routledge.
20.
CorriganTF (2018) Making implicit methods explicit: trade press analysis in the political economy of communication. International Journal of Communication12: 2751–2772. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6496
21.
DanaherJ (2017) Should we be thinking about robot sex? In: DanaherJMcArthurN (eds) Robot Sex. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 3–14.
22.
DanaherJ (2019) Building better sex robots: lessons from feminist pornography. In: ZhouYFischerMH (eds) AI Love You. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 133–147.
23.
DehnertM (2022) Sex with robots and human-machine sexualities: encounters between human-machine communication and sexuality studies. Human-Machine Communication4: 131–150.
24.
DehnertMGunkelDJ (2025) Beyond ownership: human–robot relationships between property and personhood. New Media & Society27(2): 1110–1126.
DowneyRJr (Narrator) (2019) Love, art and stories: Decoded (Season 1, Episode 4) [TV series episode]. In: DowneyRJrDowneyS (Executive Producers), The Age of A.I., YouTube Originals. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr1fmKVY3cA
27.
DrotnerK (1992) Modernity and media panics. In: SkovmanMSchroderKC (eds) Media Cultures Reappraising Transnational Media. London: Routledge, pp. 42–62.
28.
DubéSAnctilD (2021) Foundations of erobotics. International Journal of Social Robotics13: 1205–1233.
29.
Easterbrook-SmithG (2022) OnlyFans as gig-economy work: a nexus of precarity and stigma. Porn Studies. Epub ahead of print 28 July. DOI: 10.1080/23268743.2022.2096682.
30.
EdwardsA (2023) Human-robot interaction. In: GuzmanALMcEwenRJonesS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Human-Machine Communication. London: Sage Publications, Limited, pp. 310–317.
ErdoganB (2017) Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect. Cham: Palgrave.
37.
FaircloughIFaircloughN (2012) Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
38.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society3(2): 193–217.
39.
FaircloughN (2012) Critical discourse analysis. In: GeeJPHandfordM (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 9–20.
40.
FaircloughN (2023) Critical discourse analysis. In: HandfordMGeeJP (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 11–22.
41.
FaircloughNJessopBSayerA (2004) Critical realism and semiosis. In: JosephJRobertsJM (eds) Realism Discourse and Deconstruction. London: Routledge, pp. 23–42.
42.
FaustinoMJ (2018) Rebooting an old script by new means: teledildonics – the technological return to the “coital imperative.”Sexuality & Culture22(1): 243–257.
43.
FernbackJPapacharissiZ (2007) Online privacy as legal safeguard: the relationship among consumer, online portal, and privacy policies. New Media & Society9(5): 715–734.
44.
FortunatiLEdwardsA (2021) Moving ahead with human-machine communication. Human-Machine Communication2: 7–28.
45.
FortunatiLManganelliAMHöflichJ, et al. (2024) How the social robot Sophia is mediated by a YouTube video. New Media & Society26(6): 3390–3409.
46.
FortunatiLSorrentinoAFioriniL, et al. (2021) The rise of the roboid. International Journal of Social Robotics13(6): 1457–1471.
47.
FoucaultM (1976) The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (2018) European Union. Available at: https://gdpr-info.eu
50.
GersenJS (2019) Sex lex machina: intimacy and artificial intelligence. Columbia Law Review119(7): 1793–1810. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26810849
51.
GidarisC (2024) The problem of consent with teledildonics and adult webcam platforms. Surveillance & Society22(1): 6–17.
52.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of “platforms.”New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
HardyJ (2014) Critical Political Economy of the Media. London: Routledge.
56.
HelmondA (2015) The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society. Epub ahead of print 30 September. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603080.
57.
HowarthD (2000) Discourse. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
58.
JessopB (2008) State Power. Cambridge: Polity.
59.
KaraianL (2022) Plastic fantastic: sex robots and/as sexual fantasy. Sexualities. Epub ahead of print 12 June. DOI: 10.1177/13634607221106667.
LeyMRambukkanaN (2021) Touching at a distance: digital intimacies, haptic platforms, and the ethics of consent. Science and Engineering Ethics27(63): 1–17.
65.
LiHZhangR (2024) Finding love in algorithms: deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication29(5): 1–13.
66.
LiberatiN (2020) Making out with the world and valuing relationships with humans: mediation theory and the introduction of teledildonics. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics11(1): 140–146.
67.
LutzC (2023) Privacy and human-machine communication. In: GuzmanALMcEwenRJonesS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Human-Machine Communication. London: Sage Publications, Limited, pp. 310–317.
68.
LutzCTamó-LarrieuxA (2020) The robot privacy paradox: understanding how privacy concerns shape intentions to use social robots. Human-Machine Communication1: 87–111.
69.
MaJTojibDTsarenkoY (2022) Sex robots: are we ready for them? An exploration of the psychological mechanisms underlying people’s receptiveness of sex robots. Journal of Business Ethics178: 1091–1107.
70.
MarchantGEClimbingbearK (2022) Legal resistance to sex robots. Journal of Future Robotic Life3(1): 91–107.
71.
MastersonARobertL (2025) Rebranding sex robots: Realbotix’s corporate metamorphosis. In: International conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), Eindhoven, 25–29 August, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
72.
MastersonAM (2022) Designing a loving robot: a social construction analysis of a sex robot creator’s vision. Human-Machine Communication5: 99–114.
73.
MaysKKKatzJE (2023) Machines are us: an excursion in the history of HMC. In: GuzmanALMcEwenRJonesS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Human-Machine Communication. London: Sage Publications, Limited, pp. 3–11.
74.
McKeeALumbyC (2022) Pornhub, child sexual abuse materials and anti-pornography campaigning. Porn Studies9(4): 464–476.
MeehanEMoscoVWaskoJ (1994) Rethinking political economy: change and continuity. In: LevyMGurevitchM (eds) Defining Media Studies: Reflections on the Future of the Field. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–358.
77.
MeehanERTorrePJ (2011) Markets in theory and markets in television. In: WaskoJMurdockGSousaH (eds) The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 62–82.
MoscoV (2004) The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
80.
MoscoV (2009) The Political Economy of Communication. London: Sage.
81.
MurdockGGoldingP (1974) For a political economy of mass media. In: MilibandRSavilleJ (eds) The Socialist Register1973. London: Merlin, pp. 205–234.
82.
MurdockGGoldingP (2005) Culture, communications and political economy. In: CurranJGurevitchM (eds) Mass Media and Society. 4th ed.London: Hodder Arnold, pp. 60–83.
PapacharissiZFernbackJ (2005) Online privacy and consumer protection: an analysis of portal privacy statements. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(3): 259–281.
PopielPVasudevanK (2024) Platform frictions, platform power, and the politics of platformization. Information, Communication & Society27(10): 1867–1883.
89.
PowerJPymTJamesA, et al. (2024) Smart sex toys: a narrative review of recent research on cultural, health and safety considerations. Current Sexual Health Reports16(3): 199–215.
90.
PymTJamesAWalingA, et al. (2023) ‘Synced as a couple’: responsibility, control and connection in accounts of using wireless sex devices during heterosex. Sexualities28(3): 897–915.
91.
RambukkanaN (2023) Platform intimacies. Canadian Journal of Communication48(1): 175–190.
92.
RambukkanaNMatthewsS (2024) Platform intimacies: reckoning with the digital as intimate relation. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies48: 1–9.
RiordanEMeehanER (2002) Introduction. In: MeehanERRiordanE (eds) Sex & Money: Feminism and Political Economy in the Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. ix–xiv.
102.
Rodríguez-HidalgoC (2020) Me and my robot smiled at one another: the process of socially enacted communicative affordance in human-machine communication. Human-Machine Communication1: 55–69.
103.
RothschildKW (2002) The absence of power in contemporary economic theory. Journal of Socioeconomics31(5): 433–442.
SundarSS (2020) Rise of machine agency: a framework for studying the psychology of human–AI Interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer Mediated Communication25(1): 74–88.
110.
SundénJ (2020) Play, secrecy and consent: theorizing privacy breaches and sensitive data in the world of networked sex toys. Sexualities26(8): 926–940.
111.
SundénJAlburyKStardustZ (2025) Between commodified and improvisational pleasures: uses and experiences of sextech by queer, trans, and nonbinary people in Sweden and Australia. Sexualities28(8): 2328–2342.
112.
TangBSullivanDCagiltayB, et al. (2022) Confidant: a privacy controller for social robots. In: 2022 17th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), Sapporo, Japan, 7–10 March, pp. 205–214. New York: IEEE.
ThorneycroftR (2020) If not a fist, then what about a stump? Ableism and heteronormativity within Australia’s porn regulations. Porn Studies7(2): 152–167.
115.
TiidenbergK (2021) Sex, power and platform governance. Porn Studies8(4): 381–393.
116.
van DijkJ (2012 [1991]) The Network Society. 3rd ed.London: Sage.
117.
van DijkJ (2015) Critical discourse analysis. In: TannenDHamiltonHESchiffrinD (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, pp. 466–485.
118.
van DijkJ (2018) Platform mechanisms. In: van DijkJPoellTde WaalM (eds) Platform Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–49.
