Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Politically influenced by nonpolitical actors? Longitudinal reciprocal associations between social media personalities’ political social media posts and political interest in adolescence
Social media personalities—including influencers, athletes, and celebrities who are typically nonpolitical figures, such as Taylor Swift—now serve as a primary news source for many adolescents on social media This study, grounded in Social Cognitive Theory, explores how exposure to political content from adolescents’ favorite influencers and celebrities on social media may reciprocally relate to their political interest. A three-wave panel study collected data among 520 French adolescents (Mage = 15.14, SDage = 1.90, 58.7% girls) in 2021–22 and was linked to content analytical data on the political posts of adolescents’ favorite accounts. The random intercept cross-lagged panel model revealed no significant between-person differences or within-person reciprocal effects between exposure to influencers’ and celebrities’ political content and adolescents’ political interest. Furthermore, neither peer nor parental political interest moderated these relationships. Explanations for the absence of media and selection effects are discussed.
AndersenKOhmeJBjarnoeC, et al. (2021) Generational Gaps in Political Media Use and Civic Engagement: From Baby Boomers to Generation Z. London: Routledge.
2.
BanduraA (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BanduraA (2009) Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In: BryantJOliverMB (eds) Media Effects. London: Routledge, pp. 110–140.
4.
BoulianneS (2011) Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. Political Communication28(2): 147–162.
5.
Colombo-DougovitoAMEverbachTWeiller-AbelsK (2022) Not Playing around: Intersectional Identities, Media Representation, and the Power of Sport. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
CoombsD (2024) Athletes as activists and political influencers: leveraging the power of public platforms to promote issues, ideas, and political candidates. In: LillekerDJacksonDKalsnesB, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Campaigning. London: Routledge.
7.
CroesEBartelsJ (2021) Young adults’ motivations for following social influencers and their relationship to identification and buying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior124: 106910.
8.
de VreeseCHBoukesMSchuckA, et al. (2017) Linking survey and media content data: opportunities, considerations, and pitfalls. Communication Methods and Measures11(4): 221–244.
9.
DekoninckHSchmuckD (2023) The “greenfluence”: following environmental influencers, parasocial relationships, and youth’s participation behavior. New Media & Society26(11): 1–21.
10.
Dostie-GouletE (2009) Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of Youth Studies12(4): 405–421.
EndersCK (2001) A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling8: 128–141.
13.
EnkeNBorchersNS (2019) Social media influencers in strategic communication: a conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication13(4): 261–277.
14.
EriksonEH (1968) Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
15.
FerchaudAGrzesloJOrmeS, et al. (2018) Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior80: 88–96.
16.
GonzalezASchmuckDVandenboschL (2023) Posting and framing politics: a content analysis of celebrities,’ athletes,’ and influencers’ Instagram political content. Information, Communication & Society27(8): 1605–1627.
17.
GonzalezAHarffDVandenboschL (2025) The Reciprocal Links Between Exposure to Mediated Role Models' Political Content and Adolescents' Political Self-Efficacy. Preprint October 28. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/tv4x6_v1.
18.
GrahamT (2008) Needles in a haystack: a new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in non-political discussion forums. Javnost – The Public15(2): 17–36.
19.
HammondABJohnsonSKWeinerMB, et al. (2022) From Taylor Swift to MLK: understanding adolescents’ famous character role models. Journal of Moral Education53: 157–175.
20.
HarffD (2022) Political content from virtual “friends”: how influencers arouse young women’s political interest via parasocial relationships. The Journal of Social Media in Society11(2): 97–121.
21.
HarffDSchmuckD (2024a) Prevalence, presentation, and popularity of political topics in social media influencers’ content across two countries. Political Communication42: 351–381.
22.
HarffDSchmuckD (2024b) Who relies on social media influencers for political information? A cross-country study among youth. International Journal of Press/politics30(3): 841–864.
23.
HarrisJR (1995) Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review102: 458–489.
24.
HidiSRenningerKA (2006) The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist41(2): 111–127.
25.
HortonDWohlRR (1956) Mass communication and parasocial interaction: observation on intimacy at a distance. In: GumpertRCatchcartG (eds) Inter Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–56.
26.
JenningsMKStokerLBowersJ (2009) Politics across generations: family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics71: 782–799.
27.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1973) Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly37(4): 509–523.
28.
KhamisSAngLWellingR (2017) Self-branding, “micro-celebrity” and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies8(2): 191–208.
29.
KlüserKJ (2025) From entertainment to engagement? Entertainment figures’ political messaging and audience responses in the digital age. Political Communication. Epub ahead of print 6 May. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2025.2498526.
30.
KruikemeierSShehataA (2017) News media use and political engagement among adolescents: an analysis of virtuous circles using panel data. Political Communication34(2): 221–242.
31.
LeeJWalterNHayesJL, et al. (2024) Do influencers influence? A meta-analytic comparison of celebrities and social media influencers effects. Social Media + Society10(3).
32.
LoaderBDVromenAXenosMA (2016) Performing for the young networked citizen? Celebrity politics, social networking and the political engagement of young people. Media, Culture & Society38(3): 400–419.
33.
MajicSO’NeillDBernhardM (2020) Celebrity and politics. Perspectives on Politics18(1): 1–8.
34.
MansbridgeJ (1999) Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In: MacedoS (ed.) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–239.
35.
MoellerJShehataAKruikemeierS (2018) Internet use and political interest: growth curves, reinforcing spirals, and causal effects during adolescence. Journal of Communication68(6): 1052–1078.
36.
MulderJDHamakerEL (2021) Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling28: 638–648.
37.
MuthLPeterC (2023) Social media influencers’ role in shaping political opinions and actions of young audiences. Media and Communication11(3): 164–174.
38.
NadererB (2023) Influencers as political agents? The potential of an unlikely source to motivate political action. Communications48(1): 93–111.
39.
NanzAMatthesJ (2022) Seeing political information online incidentally. Effects of first- and second-level incidental exposure on democratic outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior133: 107285.
NisbettGSchartel DunnS (2021) Reputation matters: parasocial attachment, narrative engagement, and the 2018 Taylor Swift political endorsement. Atlantic Journal of Communication29(1): 26–38.
42.
NisbettGSDeWaltCC (2016) Exploring the influence of celebrities in politics: a focus group study of young voters. Atlantic Journal of Communication24(3): 144–156.
43.
NownesAJ (2021) Can celebrities set the agenda?Political Research Quarterly74(1): 117–130.
44.
ParryDADavidsonBISewallCJR, et al. (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nature Human Behaviour5(11): 1535–1547.
45.
RosengrenSCampbellC (2021) Navigating the future of influencer advertising: consolidating what is known and identifying new research directions. Journal of Advertising50(5): 505–509.
46.
RussoSStattinH (2017) Stability and change in youths’ political interest. Social Indicators Research132(2): 643–658.
47.
SchäferMSTaddickenM (2015) Opinion leadership| mediatized opinion leaders: new patterns of opinion leadership in new media environments?International Journal of Communication9: 22.
48.
SchmuckDHirschMStevicA, et al. (2022) Politics – Simply explained? How influencers affect youth’s perceived simplification of politics, political cynicism, and political interest. The International Journal of Press/politics27(3): 738–762.
49.
ShehataAAmnåE (2019) The development of political interest among adolescents: a communication mediation approach using five waves of panel data. Communication Research46(8): 1055–1077.
50.
ShehataAAnderssonDGloggerI, et al. (2021) Conceptualizing long-term media effects on societal beliefs. Annals of the International Communication Association45(1): 75–93.
51.
SlaterMD (2015) Reinforcing spirals model: conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology18(3): 370–395.
52.
Soler-i-MartíR (2015) Youth political involvement update: measuring the role of cause-oriented political interest in young people’s activism. Journal of Youth Studies18(3): 396–416.
53.
ThomasFShehataAOttoLP, et al. (2021) How to capture reciprocal communication dynamics: comparing longitudinal statistical approaches in order to analyze within- and between-person effects. Journal of Communication71(2): 187–219.
54.
Van AelstPStrömbäckJAalbergT, et al. (2017) Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association41(1): 3–27.
55.
Van DrielLDumitricaD (2021) Selling brands while staying “Authentic”: the professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence27(1): 66–84.
56.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyHE (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
VermeerSvan den HeijkantL (2023) Break a story: examining the effects of Instagram stories from news accounts on adolescents’ political learning. Journalism Studies25(9): 1029–1052.
58.
VragaEKTullyM (2020) Who is exposed to news? It depends on how you measure: examining self-reported versus behavioral news exposure measures. Social Science Computer Review38(5): 550–566.
59.
Weintraub-AustinEVan De VordRPinkletonBE, et al. (2008) Celebrity endorsements and their potential to motivate young voters. Mass Communication and Society11(4): 420–436.
60.
WunderlichLHöligSHasebrinkU (2022) Does journalism still matter? The role of journalistic and non-journalistic sources in young peoples’ news related practices. International Journal of Press/politics27(3): 569–588.
61.
ZimmermannDNollCGräßerL, et al. (2022) Influencers on YouTube: a quantitative study on young people’s use and perception of videos about political and societal topics. Current Psychology41(10): 6808–6824.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
