Following the end of the Cold War, the rise of democracy and globalization fostered optimism about global cooperation and economic integration but also sparked debates on equity, leading to challenges such as economic disparities, cultural displacement, and populist movements. Collective narcissism, a concept introduced to understand self-identity and politics amid perceived threats to status, describes beliefs that the in-group is exceptional but lacks external recognition and is associated with adverse outcomes. Drawing from the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects, this study investigates collective narcissism expressions on social media, focusing on the “Stop the Steal” movement after the 2020 US Presidential Election. Analyzing 11,836 original posts and their conversation threads, we studied the nature of collective narcissistic expression and its contagion effects. Results highlight national identity as a central theme, showing that such expressions spread through increased user engagement and are contagious from original posts to replies.
ChenAChenKZhangJ, et al. (2023) When national identity meets conspiracies: the contagion of national identity language in public engagement and discourse about COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication28(1): zmac034.
4.
ChuaiYZhaoJ (2022) Anger can make fake news viral online. Frontiers in Physics10: 970174.
5.
CichockaADhontKMakwanaAP (2017) On self-love and outgroup hate: opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality31(4): 366–384. Available at: https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/10.1002/per.2114
6.
CressU (2005) Ambivalent effect of member portraits in virtual groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning21(4): 281–291.
7.
DennyMJSpirlingA (2018) Text preprocessing for unsupervised learning: why it matters, when it misleads, and what to do about it. Political Analysis26(2): 168–189.
8.
FedericoCMGolec de ZavalaA (2018) Collective narcissism and the 2016 US presidential vote. Public Opinion Quarterly82(1): 110–121.
9.
FellbaumC (1998) A semantic network of English: the mother of All WordNets. In: VossenP (ed.) EuroWordNet: A Multilingual Database With Lexical Semantic Networks. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 137–148.
10.
FrommE (1964) The Heart of Man: Its Genius for Good and Evil. New York: AMHF.
11.
FukuyamaF (2018) Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
12.
Golec de ZavalaA (2024) The Psychology of Collective Narcissism: Insights from Social Identity Theory. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Golec de ZavalaAKeenanO (2021) Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology5(2): 54–64.
14.
Golec de ZavalaALantosD (2020) Collective narcissism and its social consequences: the bad and the ugly. Current Directions in Psychological Science29(3): 273–278.
15.
Golec de ZavalaADyduch-HazarKLantosD (2019) Collective narcissism: political consequences of investing self-worth in the ingroup’s image. Political Psychology40: 37–74.
16.
Golec de ZavalaACichockaAEidelsonR, et al. (2009) Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology97(6): 1074–1096.
17.
HuYDingJDouZ, et al. (2022) Short-text classification detector: a Bert-based mental approach. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience2022(1): 8660828.
18.
HuntingtonSP (1991) Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy2(2): 12–34.
19.
KeenanOGolec de ZavalaAG (2021) Collective narcissism and weakening of American democracy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy21(1): 237–258.
20.
LyonsPAKenworthyJBPopanJR (2010) Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of US citizens’ attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(9): 1267–1280. Available at: https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/10.1177/0146167210380604
21.
McCainJLCampbellWK (2018) Narcissism and social media use: a meta-analytic review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture7(3): 308–327.
22.
McKennaKYABarghJA (1998) Coming out in the age of the Internet: identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(3): 681–694.
23.
MarchalN (2022) “Be nice or leave me alone”: an intergroup perspective on affective polarization in online political discussions. Communication Research49(3): 376–398.
24.
MorfCCRhodewaltF (2001) Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: a dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry12(4): 177–196.
25.
MunnL (2021) More than a mob: Parler as preparatory media for the U.S. Capitol storming. First Monday26(3). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v26i3.11574.
26.
NguyenDQVuTNguyenAT (2020) BERTweet: a pre-trained language model for English Tweets. arXiv:2005.10200.
27.
Prentice-DunnSRogersRW (1982) Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43(3): 503–513.
28.
ReicherSHaslamSA (2017) The politics of hope: Donald Trump as an entrepreneur of identity. In: FitzduffM (ed.) Why Irrational Politics Appeals: Understanding the Allure of Trump. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, pp. 25–40.
29.
ReicherSD (1984) Social influence in the crowd: attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology23(4): 341–350.
30.
ReicherSDSpearsRPostmesT (1995) A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology6(1): 161–198.
31.
RobertsMEStewartBMTingleyD (2019) stm: an R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software91: 1–40.
32.
RösnerLKrämerNC (2016) Verbal venting in the social web: effects of anonymity and group norms on aggressive language use in online comments. Social Media+ Society2(3): 2056305116664220.
33.
SmithDNHanleyE (2018) The anger games: who voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 election, and why?Critical Sociology44(2): 195–212.
34.
SpearsRPostmesT (2015) Group identity, social influence, and collective action online: extensions and applications of the SIDE model. In SundarSS (ed.) The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 23–46.
35.
StieglitzSDang-XuanL (2013) Emotions and information diffusion in social media – sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems29(4): 217–248.
36.
StrakaMHajičJStrakováJ (2016) UDPipe: trainable pipeline for processing CoNLL-U files performing tokenization, morphological analysis, POS tagging and parsing. In:Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation, May, pp. 4290–4297. European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Available at: https://aclanthology.org/L16-1680/
37.
TanisMPostmesT (2005) A social identity approach to trust: interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology35(3): 413–424.
38.
WilsonTStarbirdK (2021) Cross-platform information operations: mobilizing narratives & building resilience through both “Big” & “Alt” Tech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction5(CSCW2): 1–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
