Fake news represents a threat to our society since people can face unverified and sensational information. News media can play a crucial role in disclosing and correcting misinformation. This paper argues that higher media coverage can anticipate an increase in public attention to the issue of fake news. Such relationship can be moderated by the country’s economic conditions and by the type of media system. We provide an original dataset and perform regression models for panel data on 12 countries, spanning from January 2016 to December 2022. The results indicate that the public will pay higher attention to the issue of fake news when media coverage on these topics increases; during economic turmoil the positive association between media coverage and public attention is higher; furthermore, the role of media coverage is stronger in countries with public-backed media as state sponsorship of the media strengthens their agenda-setting power.
AalbergTCurranJ (Eds) (2012) How Media Inform Democracy: A Comparative Approach (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
2.
AalbergTPapathanassopoulosSSorokaS, et al (2013) International TV news, foreign affairs interest and public knowledge: a comparative study of foreign news coverage and public opinion in 11 countries. Journalism Studies14(3): 387–406.
3.
AdamusMChayinskaMŠrolJ, et al (2025) All you’ll feel is doom and gloom: multiple perspectives on the associations between economic anxiety and conspiracy beliefs. Political Psychology. Epub ahead of print 17 February. DOI: 10.1111/pops.70003.
4.
Al-RawiAGroshekJZhangL (2019) What the fake? Assessing the extent of networked political spamming and bots in the propagation of #fakenews on Twitter. Online Information Review43(1): 53–71.
5.
AlkhaliliORobilaSA (2021) Tracking the impact of fake news on US election cycles. In: Proceedings of the conference on information technology for social good, Rome, Italy, 9-11 September 2021, pp. 192–197. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
6.
AltaySBerricheMHeuerH, et al (2023) A survey of expert views on misinformation: definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review4(4): 1–34.
7.
AzzimontiMFernandesM (2023) Social media networks, fake news, and polarization. European Journal of Political Economy76: 102256.
8.
BakirVMcStayA (2018) Fake news and the economy of emotions: problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism6(2): 154–175.
9.
BraunJAEklundJL (2019) Fake news, real money: ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism. Digital Journalism7(1): 1–21.
10.
BraunJACoakleyJDWestE (2019) Activism, advertising, and far-right media: the case of sleeping giants. Media and Communication7(4): 68–79.
Diaz RuizC (2023) Disinformation on digital media platforms: a market-shaping approach. New Media & Society27: 2188–2211.
14.
Diaz RuizC (2024) Disinformation and fake news as externalities of digital advertising: a close reading of sociotechnical imaginaries in programmatic advertising. Journal of Marketing Management. Epub ahead of print 30 October. DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2024.2421860.
15.
DonsbachW (2004) Psychology of news decisions: factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism5(2): 131–157.
16.
EgelhoferJLEberlJM (2022) Fake news. In: Ceron A (ed), Elgar Encyclopedia of Technology and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 216–220.
17.
EgelhoferJLLechelerS (2019) Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association43(2): 97–116.
18.
FarhallKCarsonAWrightS, et al (2019) Political elites’ use of fake news discourse across communications platforms. International Journal of Communication13(1): 4353–4354.
19.
FarkasJSchouJ (2018) Fake news as a floating signifier: hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost—The Public25(3): 298–314.
20.
GelfertA (2018) Fake news: a definition. Informal Logic38(1): 84–117.
21.
GodlerYReichZ (2017) Journalistic evidence: cross-verification as a constituent of mediated knowledge. Journalism18(5): 558–574.
22.
GravesLAmazeenMA (2019) Fact-checking as idea and practice in journalism. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–16.
23.
GravinoPPrevedelloGGallettiM, et al (2022) The supply and demand of news during COVID-19 and assessment of questionable sources production. Nature Human Behaviour6(8): 1069–1078.
24.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HanitzschTHanuschFRamaprasadJ, et al (2019) Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures Around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
HardyJ (2021) Media systems and misinformation. In: Tumber H and Waisbord S (eds) The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism. New York: Routledge, pp. 59–70.
27.
HousholderEWatsonBRLoRussoS (2018) Does political advertising lead to online information seeking? A real-world test using Google search data. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media62(2): 337–353.
28.
HumprechtE (2019) Where “fake news” flourishes: a comparison across four Western democracies. Information, Communication & Society22(13): 1973–1988.
29.
JastramskisDPlepytė-DavidavičienėGKupetytėR (2025) The role of organisational factors and working conditions for the autonomy of journalists in an unstable economy. Journalism Studies26: 258–277.
30.
KimBXiongALeeD, et al (2021) A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: research efforts, challenges, and future directions. PLoS ONE16(12): e0260080.
31.
KoosSVihalemmTKellerM (2017) Coping with crises: consumption and social resilience on markets. International Journal of Consumer Studies41(4): 363–370.
32.
Kreuder-SonnenC (2018) Political secrecy in Europe: crisis management and crisis exploitation. West European Politics41(4): 958–980.
33.
LawrenceMHomer-DixonTJanzwoodS, et al (2024) Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability7: e6.
34.
LeeFL (2020) Social media and the spread of fake news during a social movement: the 2019 anti-ELAB protests in Hong Kong. Communication and the Public5(3–4): 122–125.
35.
LwinMOLeeSYPanchapakesanC, et al (2023) Mainstream news media’s role in public health communication during crises: assessment of coverage and correction of COVID-19 disinformation. Health Communication38(1): 160–168.
36.
MariSGildeZunigaHSuerdemA, et al (2022) Conspiracy theories and institutional trust: examining the role of uncertainty avoidance and active social media use. Political Psychology43(2): 277–296.
37.
MatthesJCorbuNJinS, et al (2023) Perceived prevalence of misinformation fuels worries about COVID-19: a cross-country, multi-method investigation. Information, Communication & Society26: 3133–3156.
38.
McCombsMShawD (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly36(2): 176–187.
39.
MillsAJPittCFergusonSL (2019) The relationship between fake news and advertising. Journal of Advertising Research59(1): 3–8.
40.
NghiemLTPPapworthSKLimFKS, et al (2016) Analysis of the capacity of Google Trends to measure interest in conservation topics and the role of online news. PLoS ONE11: e0152802.
41.
NielsenRGravesL (2017) “News You Don’t Believe”: Audience Perspectives on Fake News. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
42.
ParkCS (2024) Comparison of objectivity, transparency, contextualization, and trust between fact-checking sites and news organizations. Journalism Practice. Epub ahead of print 7 October. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2024.2411622.
43.
PascaleCM (2019) The weaponization of language: discourses of rising right-wing authoritarianism. Current Sociology67(6): 898–917.
44.
PriorMSoodGKhannaK (2015) You cannot be serious: the impact of accuracy incentives on partisan bias in reports of economic perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science10(4): 489–518.
45.
RossASRiversDJ (2018) Discursive deflection: accusation of “fake news” and the spread of mis-and disinformation in the tweets of President Trump. Social Media + Society4(2): 2056305118776010.
46.
RubinABrondiSPellegriniG (2023) Should I trust or should I go? How people perceive and assess the quality of science communication to avoid fake news. Quality & Quantity57(5): 4455–4476.
47.
SpringP (2023) Divergence or convergence between mainstream and independent journalism in Turkey? In: KhalilJFGuaaybessTYesilB, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Media and Culture in the Middle East. Wiley, pp. 205–218.
48.
StępińskaASzabóGAdamczewskaK (2024) Changes in journalism in politicized media systems: a study on newspapers in Poland and Hungary. Journalism Practice18: 2433–2453.
49.
TörnbergPUitermarkJ (2021) Tweeting ourselves to death: the cultural logic of digital capitalism. Media, Culture & Society44: 574–590.
50.
TrielliDDiakopoulosN (2019) Search as news curator: the role of Google in shaping attention to news information. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, 4-9 May 2019, pp. 1–15. New York: ACM.
51.
TsfatiYBoomgaardenHGStrömbäckJ, et al (2020) Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: literature review and synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association44(2): 157–173.
52.
VargoCJGuoLAmazeenMA (2018) The agenda-setting power of fake news: a big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society20(5): 2028–2049.
53.
VosoughiSRoyDAralS (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science359(6380): 1146–1151.
54.
WardleCDerakhshanH (2017) Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
55.
WeeksBSouthwellB (2010) The symbiosis of news coverage and aggregate online search behavior: Obama, rumors, and presidential politics. Mass Communication and Society13(4): 341–360.
56.
ZhuZLiuYKapucuN, et al (2020) Online media and trust in government during crisis: the moderating role of sense of security. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction50: 101717.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
