The article argues for the sociocultural contextualization of Web3 affordances by examining play-to-earn gaming in the Philippines. It first outlines how socioeconomic factors promote blockchain technology and cryptocurrency. Against this background, and based on scholarship in cultural communication, anthropology, and critical platform studies, the article illustrates how sociocultural frames shape the interpretation and enactment of blockchain-based gameplay affordances. A Grounded Theory analysis of interviews and documents reveals that players identify persistent access and ownership as technical affordances, performing them through the cultural frame of cockfighting and its digital economy version, the side hustle. The study challenges universalist notions of Web3 adoption, highlighting how technical affordances both support and disrupt sociocultural and economic reproduction through narratives of family, competition, and inclusivity. The research calls for comparative studies on how platform corporations structure societies in emerging economies, how platforms exploit culture as use value, and how adopters strategically utilize Web3 technologies.
AltenriedMBojadzijevM (2017) Virtual migration, racism and the multiplication of labour. Spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures4(1): 1–16.
2.
AroraP (2024) From Pessimism to Promise. Lessons from the Global South on Designing Inclusive Tech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
AtilesJ (2022) Introduction: decoding crypto-paradises: fraud, crypto-colonialism, climate crisis, and dispossession in the Global South. The South Atlantic Quarterly121(3): 594–599.
CharmazK (2008) Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-BiberSNLeavyP (eds) Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 155–170.
14.
CostaE (2018) Affordances-in-practice: an ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media and Society20(10): 3641–3656.
15.
CouldryNMejiasU (2018) Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media20(4): 336–349.
De JesusSBAustriaDMarceloDR, et al (2022) Play-to-earn: a qualitative analysis of the experiences and challenges faced by Axie Infinity online gamers amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Psychology and Counseling12(1): 291–424.
19.
DelfabbroPDelicAKingDL (2022) Understanding the mechanics and consumer risks associated with play-to-earn (P2E) gaming. Journal of Behavioral Addictions11(3): 716–726.
20.
DelicADelfabbroP (2024) Profiling the potential risks and benefits of emerging “play to earn” games: a qualitative analysis of players’ experiences with Axie Infinity. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction22: 634–647.
21.
EglistonBCarterM (2024) Cryptogames: the promises of blockchain for the future of the videogame industry. New Media and Society26(11): 6756–6778.
22.
EvansSKPearceKEVitakJ, et al (2017) Explicating affordances: a conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication22(1): 35–52.
23.
FranciscoRRodelasNUbaldoJE (2022) The perception of Filipinos on the advent of cryptocurrency and non-fungible token (NFT) games. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research6: 1005–1018.
24.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
25.
GibsonJJ (1966) The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
GuggenheimS (1994) Cock or bull: cockfighting, social structure, and political commentary in the Philippines. In: DundesA (ed.) The Cockfight: A Casebook. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin press, pp. 133–173.
JutelO (2021) Blockchain imperialism in the Pacific. Big Data and Society8(1): 1–14.
33.
KallinikosJ (2006) The Consequences of Information. Cheltenham: Elgar.
34.
KeY (2024) ASEAN Four’s middle income trap dilemma: evidence of the middle technology trap. Asian Review of Political Economy3: 14.
35.
KingDLGainsburySMDelfabbroPH, et al (2015) Distinguishing between gaming and gambling activities in addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions4(4): 215–220.
36.
KleinN (2018) The Battle for Paradise: Puerto Rico Takes on the Disaster Capitalists. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
37.
KshetriN (2023) Economic and social impacts of Web3 and the metaverse in the Global South. In: 32nd European conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): “Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done?”Madrid, 19–20 June 2023. Calgary, AB, Canada: International Telecommunications Society.
McDonaldT (2016) Social Media in Rural China. London: UCL Press.
40.
McMillan CottomT (2020) Where platform capitalism and racial capitalism meet: the sociology of race and racism in the digital society. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity6(4): 441–449.
41.
MadianouM (2024) Technocolonialism: When Technology for Good Is Harmful. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
42.
MarčetaP (2021) Platform capitalism – towards the neo-commodification of labour? In: HaidarJKeuneM (eds) Work and Labour Relations in Global Platform Capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 69–91.
43.
MarvinG (1984) The cockfight in Andalusia, Spain: images of the truly male. Anthropological Quarterly57(2): 60–70.
MontgomeryTBaglioniS (2021) Defining the gig economy: platform capitalism and the reinvention of precarious work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy41(9–10): 1012–1025.
47.
MumfordD (2021) Data colonialism: compelling and useful, but whither epistemes?Information, Communication & Society25(10): 1511–1516.
48.
MurfinRRaySM (2003) The Bedford Glossary of Critical and Literary Terms. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins.
49.
MurrayAKimDCombsJ (2022) The promise of a better internet: what is Web 3.0 and what are we building? Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4082462
50.
NabbenK (2023) Web3 as ‘self-infrastructuring’: the challenge is how. Big Data and Society10(1). DOI: 10.1177/205395172311590.
51.
NagyPNeffG (2015) Imagined affordance: reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media and Society1(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603.
52.
NardiBA (2010) My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
53.
OxlandK (2004) Gameplay and Design. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
54.
PapamichailA (2023) Reinscribing global hierarchies: COVID-19, racial capitalism and the liberal international order. International Affairs99(4): 1673–1691.
55.
PeracchiaSPresaghiFCurcioG (2019) Pathologic use of video games and motivation: can the gaming motivation scale (GAMS) predict depression and trait anxiety?International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16(6): 1008.
56.
Philippine Statistics Authority (2023) Digital economy contributes 9.4 percent to the Gross Domestic Product in 2022. Philippine Digital Economy Satellite Accounts, 25 April. Available at: https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/digital-economy
57.
PhilipsenG (1992) Speaking Culturally: Explorations in Social Communication. Albany, NY: SUNY.
58.
PosadaJ (2024) Deeply embedded wages: navigating payments in data work. Big Data & Society11(2). DOI: 10.1177/20539517241242446.
59.
SadowskiJBeegleK (2023) Expansive and extractive networks of Web3. Big Data and Society10(1). DOI:10.1177/20539517231159.
60.
ShahN (2015) Identity and identification: the individual in the time of networked governance. The Socio Legal Review11(2): 22–40.
StraussA (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
TaiZHuF (2018) Play between love and labor: the practice of gold farming in China. New Media & Society20(7): 2370–2390.
66.
TurnerVW (1982) From Ritual to Theater: The Human Seriousness of Play. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
67.
TynerJA (2013) Population geography I: surplus populations. Progress in Human Geography37(5): 701–711.
68.
van DoornN (2017) Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 898–914.
69.
WittebornS (2021) Data privacy and displacement: a cultural approach. Journal of Refugee Studies34(2): 2291–2307.
70.
WittebornS (2023) Unruly Speech: Displacement and the Politics of Transgression. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
71.
YasayJJR (2021) The dawn of digital coins: a literature review on cryptocurrency in the Philippines. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology6(5): 199–203.
72.
ZauchaT (2024) Racial capitalism, platform capitalism, and NFTs. In: ChohanUW (ed.) Non-fungible Tokens Multidisciplinary Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 139–154.
73.
ZauchaTAgurC (2025) Playbor, gamble-play, and the financialization of digital games. New Media and Society27(3): 1279–1298.
74.
ZhangLFungAY (2014) Working as playing? Consumer labor, guild and the secondary industry of online gaming in China. New Media & Society16(1): 38–54.
