The effect of positive and negative daily social media emotional experiences on older adults’ subjective age: Unveiling the negativity bias in WhatsApp groups
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2026
The effect of positive and negative daily social media emotional experiences on older adults’ subjective age: Unveiling the negativity bias in WhatsApp groups
Social media has become instrumental for older adults in maintaining social connections, which are an integral component of older adults’ well-being. However, little is known about how daily positive/negative social media emotional experiences are associated with older adults’ subjective views of aging. The current study examined daily emotional experiences related to WhatsApp groups and their association with subjective age (feeling younger/older than one’s chronological age). Data were collected from 42 Israeli older adults who confirmed daily WhatsApp usage (Mage = 74.30, SD = 8.39). Participants reported their daily WhatsApp emotional experiences in family/other groups and daily subjective age over 14 consecutive days, resulting in 557 completed reports. Results demonstrated that on days older adults reported negative WhatsApp group emotional experiences they felt older. Positive emotional experiences were associated with feeling younger solely when these experiences were reported in relation to family WhatsApp groups. Time-lagged models further indicated that only negative (but not positive) WhatsApp emotional experiences on a given day predicted an older subjective age the following day. The results underscore the significance of daily social media emotional experiences in shaping older adults’ daily subjective age. They also indicate the presence of a negativity bias effect in social media interactions among older adults.
AlfasiY (2019) The grass is always greener on my Friends’ profiles: the effect of Facebook social comparison on state self-esteem and depression. Personality and Individual Differences147: 111–117.
2.
Alonso DebreczeniFBaileyPE (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective age and the association with cognition, subjective well-being, and depression. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B76(3): 471–482.
3.
Amichai-HamburgerYEtgarS (2018) Internet and well-being. In: ForgasJPBaumeisterRF (eds) The Social Psychology of Living Well (pp. 298–318). London: Routledge.
4.
Amichai-HamburgerYGazitTBar-IlanJ, et al (2016) Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior55: 268–277.
AvizoharCGazitTAharonyN (2023) Facebook medical support groups: the communication privacy management perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management75: 664–684.
7.
AyalonLCohn-SchwartzE (2021) The reciprocal temporal associations between subjective age and social relations in adult day care centers over a one-year period. International Journal of Behavioral Development45(1): 69–77.
8.
AyalonLPalgiYAvidorS, et al (2016) Accelerated increase and decrease in subjective age as a function of changes in loneliness and objective social indicators over a four-year period: results from the health and retirement study. Aging & Mental Health20(7): 743–751.
9.
Bar-IlanJGazitTAmichai-HamburgerY (2020) Leading factors that explain engagement in closed Facebook groups. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal25(3): 866.
10.
BarakBSchiffmanLG (1981) Cognitive age: a nonchronological age variable. Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1): 602–606.
11.
BaumeisterRFBratslavskyEFinkenauerC, et al (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology5(4): 323–370.
12.
BerglandANicolaisenMThorsenK (2014) Predictors of subjective age in people aged 40–79 years: a five-year follow-up study. The impact of mastery, mental and physical health. Aging & Mental Health18(5): 653–661.
13.
BergmanYSShriraA (2022) Cultural differences in the association between subjective age and health: evidence from the Israeli component of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE-Israel). Ageing & Society42(1): 32–47.
14.
BergmanYSCohen-FridelSShriraA, et al (2020) COVID-19 health worries and anxiety symptoms among older adults: the moderating role of ageism. International Psychogeriatrics32(11): 1371–1375.
BodnerEShriraAHoffmanY, et al (2021) Day-to-day variability in subjective age and ageist attitudes and their association with depressive symptoms. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B76(5): 836–844.
17.
BronsteinJGazitTPerezO, et al (2016) An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social platforms. Aslib Journal of Information Management68(6): 793–818.
18.
CarstensenLL (1992) Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging7: 331–338.
19.
CarstensenLLDeLiemaM (2018) The positivity effect: a negativity bias in youth fades with age. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences19: 7–12.
20.
CarstensenLLIsaacowitzDMCharlesST (1999) Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist54: 165–181.
CloosLCeulemansEKuppensP (2023) Development, validation, and comparison of self-report measures for positive and negative affect in intensive longitudinal research. Psychological Assessment35(3): 189–204.
23.
CohenSBodnerEShriraA (2022) An interpersonal approach to subjective views of aging. In: PalgiYShriraADiehlM (eds) Subjective Views of Aging: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 115–132.
24.
Cohn-SchwartzEGerstorfD (2022) Subjective views of aging: the utility of studying multiple time metrics. In: PalgiYShriraADiehlM (eds) Subjective Views of Aging: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 169–186.
25.
Cohn-SchwartzESchaferMHAyalonL (2022) Age integration in later life social networks and self-perceptions of aging: examining their reciprocal associations. European Journal of Ageing19(4): 1145–1153.
26.
CostaEEsteve-Del-ValleMHagedoornB (2022) Scalable co-presence: WhatsApp and the mediation of personal relationships during the COVID-19 lockdown. Social Media + Society8(1): 205630512110690.
27.
CottenSRSchusterAMSeifertA (2022) Social media use and well-being among older adults. Current Opinion in Psychology45: 101293.
28.
CummingsJNSproullLKieslerSB (2002) Beyond hearing: where the real-world and online support meet. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice6(1): 78–88.
29.
DerksDBakkerABGorgievskiM (2021) Private smartphone use during worktime: a diary study on the unexplored costs of integrating the work and family domains. Computers in Human Behavior114: 106530.
30.
DworschakCHeimEMaerckerA (2022) Efficacy of internet-based interventions for common mental disorder symptoms and psychosocial problems in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Internet Interventions27: 100498.
Fernández-ArdèvolMBelottiFIeracitanoF, et al (2022) “I do it my way”: idioms of practice and digital media ideologies of adolescents and older adults. New Media & Society24(1): 31–49.
33.
FoongHFLimSYRokhaniFZ, et al (2022) For better or for worse? A scoping review of the relationship between Internet use and mental health in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(6): 6.
34.
FreedmanVAHuMKasperJD (2022) Changes in older adults’ social contact during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B77(7): e160–e166.
35.
GaleaSMerchantRMLurieN (2020) The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early interventions JAMA network. JAMA Internal Medicine180(6): 817–818.
36.
GarciaDKappasAKüsterD, et al (2016) The dynamics of emotions in online interaction. Royal Society Open Science3(8): 160059.
37.
GazitT (2021) Key motivations for leading Facebook communities: a uses and gratifications approach. Aslib Journal of Information Management73(3): 454–472.
38.
GazitTAharonyNAmichai-HamburgerY (2019) Tell me who you are and I will tell you which SNS you use: SNSs participation. Online Information Review44(1): 139–161.
39.
GazitTAharonyN (2018) Factors explaining participation in WhatsApp groups: an exploratory study. Aslib Journal of Information Management70(4): 390–413.
40.
GazitTBronsteinJAmichai-HamburgerY, et al (2018) Active participants and lurkers in online discussion groups: an exploratory analysis of focus group interviews and observation. Information Research23(2): Paper791.
41.
GazitTMassHBronsteinJ (2023) Examining Facebook groups engaging in reading experiences: The interactive therapeutic process perspective. Empirical Studies of the Arts41(1): 259–283.
42.
GazitTNisimSAyalonL (2023) Intergenerational family online community and older adults’ overall well-being. Online Information Review47(2): 221–237.
43.
GrossmanESHoffmanYSGPalgiY, et al (2021) COVID-19 related loneliness and sleep problems in older adults: worries and resilience as potential moderators. Personality and Individual Differences168: 110371.
44.
HämmerleVPauliCBraunwalderR, et al (2020) WhatsApp’s influence on social relationships of older adults. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on information and communication technologies for ageing well and e-health, Prague, Czech Republic, May 3–5, 2020, pp. 93–98. Setúbal: Science and Technology Publications.
45.
HarrisonMAGilmoreAL (2012) U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging. The Social Science Journal49(4): 513–518.
46.
HilbigBE (2009) Sad, thus true: negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45(4): 983–986.
47.
HoferMHargittaiE (2024) Online social engagement, depression, and anxiety among older adults. New Media & Society26(1): 113–130.
48.
HoffmanYAvidorSPalgiY (2022) Subjective views of aging in the context of adversity: in support of a resource-stress model. In: PalgiYShriraADiehlM (eds) Subjective Views of Aging: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 269–288.
49.
HoffmanYShriraABodnerE (2021) PTSD symptoms, daily subjective age, and psychological distress in community-dwelling older adults. GeroPsych34(4): 179–188.
50.
HornikJShaanan SatchiRCesareoL, et al (2015) Information dissemination via electronic word-of-mouth: good news travels fast, bad news travels faster!Computers in Human Behavior45: 273–280.
51.
HughesMLTouronDR (2021) Aging in context: incorporating everyday experiences into the study of subjective age. Frontiers in Psychiatry12: 633234.
52.
KafetsiosKChatzakouDTsigilisN, et al (2017) Experience of emotion in face to face and computer-mediated social interactions: an event sampling study. Computers in Human Behavior76: 287–293.
53.
KarapanosETeixeiraPGouveiaR (2016) Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: a case on Facebook and WhatsApp. Computers in Human Behavior55: 888–897.
54.
KleimanE (2021) EMAtools: data management tools for real-time monitoring/ecological momentary assessment data (Version 0.1.4) [Computer software].
55.
Knobloch-WesterwickSMothesCPolavinN (2020) Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research47(1): 104–124.
56.
KöttlHCohn-SchwartzEAyalonL (2021) Self-perceptions of aging and everyday ICT engagement: a test of reciprocal associations. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B76(9): 1913–1922.
57.
LangFRCarstensenLL (2002) Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging17(1): 125–139.
58.
Martinez-ComecheJ-ARuthvenI (2021) Engaging interaction and long-term engagement with WhatsApp in an everyday life context: exploratory study. Journal of Documentation77(4): 825–850.
59.
MatassiMBoczkowskiPJMitchelsteinE (2019) Domesticating WhatsApp: family, friends, work, and study in everyday communication. New Media & Society21(10): 2183–2200.
60.
MeierLLOrthUDenissenJJA, et al (2011) Age differences in instability, contingency, and level of self-esteem across the life span. Journal of Research in Personality45(6): 604–612.
61.
MeurerJSteinMRandallD, et al (2018) Designing for way-finding as practices – a study of elderly people’s mobility. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies115: 40–51.
62.
NakagawaSSchielzethH (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution4(2): 133–142.
63.
NaslundJAAschbrennerKAMarschLA, et al (2016) The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences25(2): 113–122.
64.
NewmanMGZainalNH (2020) The value of maintaining social connections for mental health in older people. The Lancet Public Health5(1): e12–e13.
65.
NorrisCJ (2021) The negativity bias, revisited: evidence from neuroscience measures and an individual differences approach. Social Neuroscience16(1): 68–82.
66.
NowlandRNeckaEACacioppoJT (2018) Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world?Perspectives on Psychological Science13(1): 70–87.
67.
OhlySSonnentagSNiessenC, et al (2010) Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology9(2): 79–93.
68.
PalgiYShriraADiehlM (2022) Subjective Views of Aging: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cham: Springer Nature.
69.
ParkCS (2015) Applying “negativity bias” to Twitter: negative news on Twitter, emotions, and political learning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics12(4): 342–359.
PengSSilversteinMSuitorJJ, et al (2018) Use of communication technology to maintain intergenerational contact: toward an understanding of “digital solidarity.” In: NevesBBCasimiroC (eds) Connecting Families?Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 159–180. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/display/book/9781447339953/ch009.xml
72.
PrimackBAKarimSAShensaA, et al (2019) Positive and negative experiences on social media and perceived social isolation. American Journal of Health Promotion33(6): 859–868.
73.
RipponISteptoeA (2018) Is the relationship between subjective age, depressive symptoms and activities of daily living bidirectional?Social Science & Medicine214: 41–48.
74.
RozinPRoyzmanEB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review5(4): 296–320.
75.
RyffCD (1989) Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(6): 1069–1081.
76.
SabatiniSWilton-HardingBBallardC, et al (2023) Bidirectional associations of awareness of age-related change and attitudes toward own aging with social media use. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 78: 1349–1359.
77.
SchemerCMasurPKGeißS, et al (2021) The impact of internet and social media use on well-being: a longitudinal analysis of adolescents across nine years. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication26(1): 1–21.
78.
Segel-KarpasDShriraABodnerE (2019) Daily fluctuations in subjective age and mental health: the roles of chronological age and attitudes to aging. Innovation in Aging3(Suppl. 1): S51.
79.
ShriraAPalgiYDiehlM (2022) Advancing the field of subjective views of aging: an overview of recent achievements. In:PalgiYShriraADiehlM (eds) Subjective Views of Aging: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–37.
80.
ShriraAPalgiYBen-EzraM, et al (2011) For better and for worse: the relationship between future expectations and functioning in the second half of life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 66B(2): 195–203.
81.
SorokaSFournierPNirL (2019) Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(38): 18888–18892.
82.
SpitzerNSegel-KarpasDPalgiY (2022) Close social relationships and loneliness: the role of subjective age. International Psychogeriatrics34(7): 651–655.
83.
SunJJiangWLiH (2022) Social isolation and loneliness among Chinese older adults: examining aging attitudes as mediators and moderators. Frontiers in Psychology13: 1043921.
84.
TsangVHLTseDCKChuL, et al (2022) The mediating role of loneliness on relations between face-to-face and virtual interactions and psychological well-being across age: a 21-day diary study. International Journal of Behavioral Development46(6): 500–509.
85.
Vitman SchorrAYehudaITamirS (2021) Loneliness, malnutrition and change in subjective age among older adults during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(1): 106.
86.
WesterhofGJNehrkorn-BaileyAMTsengH-Y, et al (2023) Longitudinal effects of subjective aging on health and longevity: an updated meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging38(3): 147–166.
87.
WoodSKisleyMA (2006) The negativity bias is eliminated in older adults: age-related reduction in event-related brain potentials associated with evaluative categorization. Psychology and Aging21: 815–820.
88.
ZhangKKimKSilversteinNM, et al (2021) Social media communication and loneliness among older adults: the mediating roles of social support and social contact. The Gerontologist61(6): 888–896.
89.
ZhaoNZhouG (2020) Social media use and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being12(4): 1019–1038.
