Taking facial recognition access control (FRAC) as an example, this article examines the changing and fluctuant infrastructuralization process of facial recognition technology (FRT) in China. Drawing on ethnographic interviews, observations, and qualitative content analysis, we provide empirical accounts of how local governments, commercial entities, and community residents perceive FRT in different logics and how FRAC terminals become a key site for social negotiations unfolding through combinations of relation, power, and capital. The article outlines a new framework “beta-infrastructure” to capture the semi-material and semi-social characters of technology artifacts in nowadays digital society. The concept emphasizes both the material functionalities of FRT and the role of local citizens in negotiating what it means to be a good smart city.
AmankwaaEFGoughKV (2021) Everyday contours and politics of infrastructure: informal governance of electricity access in urban Ghana. Urban Studies59(12): 2468–2488.
BoyerD (2018) Infrastructure, potential energy, revolution. In: AppelHAnandNGuptaA (eds) The Promise of Infrastructure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 223–244.
5.
BrayD (2005) Social Space and Governance in Urban China: The Danwei System From Origins to Reform. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
CCTV-Finance (2020) 10 billion Yuan of facial recognition market, Tencent, Alibaba and other giants have scrambled for it. Available at: https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2020-08/19/1301474925.html (accessed 15 February 2023).
8.
ChenJYQiuJL (2019) Digital utility: datafication, regulation, labor, and DiDi’s platformization of urban transport in China. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 274–289.
9.
ChenYMaoZQiuJL (2018) Super-Sticky Wechat and Chinese Society. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
10.
China Consumers Association (2019) Property service survey experience report of some residential communities in China. Available at: https://www.cca.org.cn/jmxf/detail/29362.html (accessed 15 February 2023).
CiborraCU (1992) From thinking to tinkering: the grassroots of strategic information systems. The Information Society8(4): 297–309.
13.
ColettaCHeaphyLKitchinR (2018) From the accidental to articulated smart city: the creation and work of “Smart Dublin.”European Urban and Regional Studies26(4): 349–364.
14.
CorneaN (2019) Territorialising control in urban West Bengal: social clubs and everyday governance in the spaces between state and party. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(2): 312–328.
15.
EdwardsPNJacksonSJBowkerGC, et al (2007) Understanding infrastructure: dynamics, tensions, and design. In: History and theory of infrastructure: lessons for new scientific cyberinfrastructures, Ann Arbor, MI, January, pp. 8–9. Ann Arbor, MI: Human and Social Dynamics Computer and Information Science and Engineering Office of Cyberinfrastructure.
HarveyPJensenCBMoritaA (2016) Infrastructures and Social Complexity: A Companion. London: Taylor & Francis.
18.
KazanskyBMilanS (2021) “Bodies not templates”: contesting dominant algorithmic imaginaries. New Media & Society23(2): 363–381.
19.
KostkaGSteinackerLMeckelM (2021) Between security and convenience: facial recognition technology in the eyes of citizens in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Public Understanding of Science30(6): 671–690.
20.
Lanzhou Morning News (2021) Residential community implements facial recognition mode, nearly 170,000 People in Lanzhou benefit from “smart security.” Available at: https://gs.ifeng.com/c/834wm7SrQBZ (accessed 30 August 2023).
21.
LarkinB (2008) Signal and Noise: Media, Infrastructure, and Urban Culture in Nigeria. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
LarkinB (2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology42(1): 327–343.
23.
LathamALaytonJ (2022) Social infrastructure: why it matters and how urban geographers might study it. Urban Geography43(5): 659–668.
24.
LaytonJLathamA (2021) Social infrastructure and public life—notes on Finsbury Park, London. Urban Geography43(5): 755–776.
25.
LemkeT (2023) Conceptualising suspended life: from latency to liminality. Theory, Culture & Society40(6): 69–86.
26.
LiHAtuahene-GimaK (2001) Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal44(6): 1123–1134.
27.
McFarlaneC (2018) Fragment urbanism: politics at the margins of the city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(6): 1007–1025.
28.
McFarlaneCRutherfordJ (2008) Political infrastructures: governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32(2): 363–374.
29.
Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (2022) Nine departments issued the notice, “On the in-depth promotion of the construction of intelligent communities.” Available at: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-05/21/content_5691593.htm (accessed 15 February 2023).
NyeJS (2020) Perspectives for a China strategy. Prism8(4): 120–131.
32.
PlantinJCde SetaG (2019) WeChat as infrastructure: the techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 257–273.
33.
PlantinJCPunathambekarA (2019) Digital media infrastructures: pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society41(2): 163–174.
34.
PollockNWiliamsR (2008) Software and Organisations: The Biography of the Enterprise-Wide System Or How SAP Conquered the World.Routledge.
35.
SadowskiJ (2019) When data is capital: datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society6(1): 205395171882054.
36.
SadowskiJ (2020) Who owns the future city? Phases of technological urbanism and shifts in sovereignty. Urban Studies58(8): 1732–1744.
37.
SadowskiJBendorR (2019) Selling smartness: corporate narratives and the smart city as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values44(3): 540–563.
38.
SchlægerJJiangM (2014) Official microblogging and social management by local governments in China. China Information28(2): 189–213.
39.
ScottSVWagnerEL (2003) Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration. Information and Organization13(4): 285–313.
40.
ShiLShiCWuX, et al (2021) Accelerating the development of smart city initiatives amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of health code in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy15(2): 266–283.
41.
StarSL (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 377–391.
42.
StarSLRuhlederK (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research7(1): 111–134.
43.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2013) Several opinions of the state council on promoting information consumption and boosting domestic demand. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2013/content_2473877.htm (accessed 15 February 2023).
44.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2021) CPC central committee and state council on strengthening the grass-roots governance system and the modernization of governance capacity. Available at: http://www.Gov.Cn/Zhengce/2021-07/11/Content_5624201.htm (accessed 15 February 2023).
45.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2022) Plan for development of the digital economy during the “14th five-year” period. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2022/content_5671108.htm (accessed 15 February 2023).
WinnerL (2007 [1980]) Do artifacts have politics? In: WeckertJ (ed.) Computer Ethics. New York: Routledge, pp. 177–192.
52.
YangXZhouY (2002) Danwei System in China. Beijing, China: China Economic Publishing House, p. 38.
53.
YeM (2016) The “highlight project” of policy implementation and its production logic: a discussion based on the policy process of new rural construction in X city. Journal of Gansu Institute of Public Administration6: 19–30, 125.
54.
ZhangZ (2021) Infrastructuralization of TikTok: transformation, power relationships, and platformization of video entertainment in China. Media, Culture & Society43(2): 219–236.
