This research investigates the strategic use of protest imagery on social media by movement parties, bridging the gap between protest and institutional politics. We apply a mixed-methods analysis of 9584 Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram image posts by seven movement parties between 2015 and 2021. We find that protest images frequently serve to amplify movement grievances. Yet, parties’ involvement with contentious protest forms undergoes temporal shifts, influenced mainly by their evolving positions within the polity. Moreover, parties’ engagement with protest images differs by country and ideological leaning. Movement parties on the Right express a conflictual position between supporting and delegitimizing different protests. Conversely, Left-leaning counterparts tend to support protest, yet veer toward deradicalization and emphasizing symbolism over disruptive tactics, once they become more institutionalized. This research highlights the intricate relationship between movement parties, protest, and visual narratives on social media, in light of the interplay between movements and institutional politics.
Bíró-NagyABorosT (2016) Jobbik going mainstream; strategy shift of the Far right in Hungary. In: JaminJ (ed.) L’extreme droite en Europe. Bruxelles: Bruylant, pp. 244–263.
2.
BlaagaardB (2022) Embodied protests on social media: the visual political discourses of vulnerability and endurance in the cases of “hands up, don’t shoot” and #IRunWithMaud. In: MortensenMMcCrow-YoungA (eds) Social Media Images and Conflicts. New York: Routledge, pp. 77–91.
3.
BlaagaardBMortensenMNeumayerC (2017) Digital images and globalized conflict. Media, Culture & Society39(8): 1111–1121.
4.
BorbáthEGesslerT (2020) Different worlds of contention? Protest in Northwestern, Southern and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research59(4): 910–935.
5.
BorbáthEHutterS (2021) Protesting parties in Europe: a comparative analysis. Party Politics27(5): 896–908.
6.
BossettaM (2018) The digital architectures of social media: comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95(2): 471–496.
7.
CaianiMCísařO (2019) Radical Right Movement Parties in Europe. London: Routledge.
8.
CammaertsB (2012) Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication27(2): 117–134.
9.
Corrigall-BrownCWilkesR (2012) Picturing protest: the visual framing of collective action by first nations in Canada. American Behavioral Scientist56(2): 223–243.
10.
della PortaDRuchtD (1995) Left-libertarian movements in context: a comparison of Italy and west Germany, 1965–1990. In: JenkinsJCKlandermansB (eds) The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movement. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 229–272.
11.
della PortaDFernándezJKoukiH, et al (2017) Movement parties in times of (anti-)austerity: an introduction. In: della PortaDFernándezJKoukiH, et al (eds) Movement Parties Against Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–28.
12.
DennisJ (2020) A party within a party posing as a movement? Momentum as a movement faction. Journal of Information Technology & Politics17(2): 97–113.
13.
DoerrN (2021) The visual politics of the alternative for Germany (AfD): anti-Islam, ethno-nationalism, and gendered images. Social Sciences10(1): 1–15.
14.
DoerrNMattoniATeuneS (2013) Toward a visual analysis of social movements, conflict, and political mobilization. In: DoerrNMattoniATeuneS (eds) Advances in the Visual Analysis of Social Movements, vol. 35. Leeds: Emerald, pp. xi–xxvi.
15.
DragomanD (2020) “Save Romania” union and the persistent populism in Romania. Problems of Post-Communism68(4): 1–12.
16.
GamsonWAWolfsfeldG (1993) Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science528: 114–125.
17.
GerbaudoP (2018) Social media and populism: an elective affinity?Media, Culture & Society40(5): 745–753.
18.
GerbaudoPTreréE (2015) In search of the “we” of social media activism: introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society18(8): 865–871.
19.
GoldstoneJA (2003) Introduction: bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized Politics. In: GoldstoneJA (ed.) States, Parties, and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.
20.
HeinzeA-SWeisskircherM (2023) How political parties respond to pariah street protest: the case of anti-corona mobilisation in Germany. German Politics32: 563–584.
21.
HoffmannMNeumayerC (2023) Movement parties’ interactions on social media: positioning and trajectories in the polity arena. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. Epub ahead of print 23 July. DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2023.2239817.
22.
HoffmannMRoneJ (2023) Interconnected realities: the hybrid dynamics of far-right online and offline mobilization. In: WeisskircherM (ed.) Contemporary Germany and the Fourth Wave of Far-Right Politics From the Streets to Parliament. New York: Routledge, pp. 57–75.
23.
HoffmannMSteinhilperEBauerK (2022) Fields of contention as a prism: toward a nuanced role of parties and civil society actors in protest interactions. Social Movement Studies. Epub ahead of print 22 December. DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2022.2158074.
24.
HopsterJ (2021) Mutual affordances: the dynamics between social media and populism. Media, Culture & Society43(3): 551–560.
25.
HustedE (2018) “Some have ideologies, we have values”: the relationship between organizational values and commitment in a political party. Culture and Organization26(3): 175–195.
26.
HutterSBorbáthE (2019) Challenges from left and right: the long-term dynamics of protest and electoral politics in Western Europe. European Societies21(4): 487–512.
27.
HutterSKriesiH (2013) Movements of the left, movements of the right reconsidered. In: Van StekelenburgJRoggebandCKlandermansB (eds) The Future of Social Movement Research: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Processes. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 281–298.
28.
KitscheltH (2006) Movement parties. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 278–290.
29.
KleinOPirroALP (2020) Reverting trajectories? UKIP’s organisational and discursive change after the Brexit referendum. Information, Communication & Society24(10): 1382–1400.
30.
KostelkaFRovnyJ (2019) It’s not the left: ideology and protest participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies52(11): 1677–1712.
31.
LarssonAO (2022) Picture-perfect populism: tracing the rise of European populist parties on Facebook. New Media & Society24(1): 227–245.
32.
LarssonAO (2023) The rise of Instagram as a tool for political communication: a longitudinal study of European political parties and their followers. New Media & Society25(10): 2744–2762.
33.
MattoniATeuneS (2014) Visions of protest. A media-historic perspective on images in social movements. Sociology Compass8(6): 876–887.
McAdamDTarrowSTillyC (2004) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
McSwineyJVaughanMHeftA, et al (2021) Sharing the hate? Memes and transnationality in the far right’s digital visual culture. Information, Communication & Society24: 2502–2521.
37.
MerceaDMoscaL (2021) Understanding movement parties through their communication. Information, Communication & Society24(10): 1327–1343.
38.
MeyerDSTarrowS (eds) (1998) The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
39.
MinkenbergM (2019) Between party and movement: conceptual and empirical considerations of the radical right’s organizational boundaries and mobilization processes. European Societies21(4): 463–468.
40.
MirzoeffN (2011) The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
MortensenM (2015) Conflictual media events, eyewitness images, and the Boston marathon bombing (2013). Journalism Practice9(4): 536–551.
42.
MortensenMMcCrow-YoungA (eds) (2022) Social Media Images and Conflicts. London: Routledge.
43.
MortensenMNeumayerC (2021) The playful politics of memes. Information, Communication & Society24(16): 2367–2377.
NeumayerCRossiL (2018) Images of protest in social media: struggle over visibility and visual narratives. New Media & Society20(11): 4293–4310.
46.
NeumayerCRossiLKarlssonB (2016) Contested hashtags: Blockupy Frankfurt in social media. International Journal of Communication10: 5558–5579.
47.
NeumayerCRossiLStruthersDM (2021) Invisible data: a framework for understanding visibility processes in social media data. Social Media + Society7: 2056305120984472.
48.
PearceWÖzkulaSMGreeneAK, et al (2020) Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society23(2): 161–180.
49.
PedersenMN (1982) Towards a new typology of party lifespans and minor parties. Scandinavian Political Studies5(1): 1–16.
50.
PirroALP (2019) Ballots and barricades enhanced: far-right “movement parties” and movement-electoral interactions. Nations and Nationalism25(3): 782–802.
51.
PirroALPGattinaraPC (2018) Movement parties of the far right: the organization and strategies of nativist collective actors. Mobilization: An International Quarterly23(3): 367–383.
52.
PirroALPPavanEFaganA, et al (2021) Close ever, distant never? Integrating protest event and social network approaches into the transformation of the Hungarian far right. Party Politics27(1): 22–34.
53.
PoellTBorraE (2012) Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: the social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism13(6): 695–713.
54.
PoellTVan DijckJ (2015) Social media and activist communication. In: AttonC (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media. London: Routledge, pp. 527–537.
55.
RichardsonJWodakR (2009) The impact of visual racism: visual arguments in political leaflets of Austrian and British Far-Right Parties. Controversia6(2): 45–77.
56.
RossiLNeumayerCHenrichsenJ, et al (2023) Measuring violence: a computational analysis of violence and propagation of image tweets from political protest. Social Science Computer Review41(3): 905–925.
57.
SchillD (2012) The visual image and the political image: a review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. The Review of Communication12(2): 118–142.
58.
SchmidtkeO (2020) Politicizing social inequality: competing narratives from the alternative for Germany and left-wing movement stand up. Frontiers in Sociology5: 1–11.
59.
SontagS (1977) On Photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
60.
Spector-MerselG (2011) Mechanisms of selection in claiming narrative identities: a model for interpreting narratives. Qualitative Inquiry17(2): 172–185.
61.
TarrowS (2021) Movements and parties in contentious politics. In: TarrowS (ed.) Movements and Parties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–26.
62.
TillyC (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House.
63.
TillyC (2004) Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(2): 211–236.
64.
TrillòTStaritaGD (2023) The middle region populism of Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Renzi on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Epub ahead of print 22 July. DOI: 10.1177/19401612231186938.
65.
VersteegenPL (2023) The excluded ordinary? A theory of populist radical right supporters’ position in society. European Journal of Social Psychology53: 1327–1341.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
