‘Conspiracy theories should be called spoiler alerts’: Conspiracy,coronavirus and affective community on Russell Brand’s YouTube comment section

Abstract

This article examines how conspiracy theories anchor affective communities through an analysis of the YouTube comment section for the actor and comedian turned political influencer, Russell Brand. Comparing videos before and after Brand’s shift to covid scepticism, I explore like counts, reply networks and other commenting patterns in a dataset of 217,157 comments and conduct an in-depth analysis of 2000 top comments. The findings show first, a shift towards right-wing viewpoints; second, a reduction in comment length and comment replies alongside an increase in likes; third, a sharp rise in proclamations of Brand fandom; and fourth, a steep increase in references to conspiracy. The in-depth analysis reveals that comments focused not on narrating the content of conspiracies but on celebrating conspiracy as the basis of a political community and as a defence against accusations of paranoia. I argue that conspiracy theories can function as formal categories that anchor affective communities.

Keywords

Affect comment section conspiracy coronavirus ideology micro-celebrity paranoid style politics social media YouTube

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argentino

(2021) Pastel QAnon. GNET, 17 March. Available at: https://gnet-research.org/2021/03/17/pastel-qanon/ (accessed 2 March 2023).

Barkun

(2013) A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Belew

(2019 [2018]) Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement in Paramilitary America. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Birchall

Knight

(2022) Do your own research: conspiracy theories and the internet. Social Research 89: 579–605.

Birchall

Knight

(2023) Conspiracy Theories in the Time of Covid-19. London: Routledge.

Bloom

Moskalenko

(2022 [2021]) Pastels and Pedophiles: Inside the Mind of QAnon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Burgess

Green

(2018) Youtube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

Callison

Slobodian

(2021) Coronapolitics from the Reichstag to the capitol. Boston Review, 12 January. Available at: https://bostonreview.net/politics/william-callison-quinn-slobodian-coronapolitics-reichstag-capitol (accessed 18 January 2023).

Chadwick

Kaiser

Vaccari

, et al. (2021) Online social endorsement and Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom. Social Media + Society 7(2): 20563051211008817.

10.

Charmaz

(2006) Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.

11.

Chilton

(2022) How did Russell Brand go from stand-up stardom to peddling YouTube conspiracy theories? The Independent, 25 March. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/features/russell-brand-youtube-conspiracy-theories-b2043777.html (accessed 27 January 2023).

12.

Chun

WHK

(2021) Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Daniels

(2009) Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

14.

Edelman

(2022) On solidarity. Representations 158: 93–105.

15.

Fenster

(2008) Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

16.

Finlayson

(2022) YouTube and political Ideologies: technology, populism and rhetorical form. Political Studies 70: 62–80.

17.

Ganesh

(2020) Weaponizing white thymos: flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt-right. Cultural Studies 34: 892–924.

18.

Gray

Sandvoss

Harrington

(2017) Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. 2nd ed. New York: NYU Press.

19.

Hofstadter

(1964) The paranoid style in American politics. Harper’s Magazine, November. Available at: https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/ (accessed 18 February 2023).

20.

Kellner

(2021) Trump, authoritarian populism, and COVID-19 from a US Perspective. Cultural Politics 17: 28–36.

21.

Kelly

(2022) QAnon and on: an ever-evolving conspiracy theory built on denial. Sociological Review, 10 May. Available at: https://thesociologicalreview.org/magazine/may-2022/belief/qanon-and-on/ (accessed 23 February 2023).

22.

Laclau

(1996) Emancipation(s). New York: Verso Books.

23.

Lewis

(2020) ‘This is what the news won’t show you’: YouTube creators and the reactionary politics of micro-celebrity. Television & New Media 21: 201–217.

24.

Marres

(2018) Why we can’t have our facts back. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 423–443.

25.

McKenzie-McHarg

(2022) From status politics to the paranoid style: Richard Hofstadter and the pitfalls of psychologizing history. Journal of the History of Ideas 83: 451–475.

26.

Michallon

(2022) Russell Brand is the new Joe Rogan—and I’m the one he warned you about. The Independent, 14 March. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/author/clemence-michallon (accessed 17 February 2023).

27.

Mudde

(2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Munger

Phillips

(2022) Right-wing YouTube: a supply and demand perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics 27: 186–219.

29.

Murthy

Sharma

(2019) Visualizing YouTube’s comment space: online hostility as a networked phenomena. New Media & Society 21: 191–213.

30.

Olmsted

(2018) A conspiracy so dense: the dubious half-life of Richard Hofstadter’s ‘paranoid style’. The Baffler, November. Available at: https://thebaffler.com/salvos/a-conspiracy-so-dense-olmsted (accessed 16 February 2023).

31.

Pertwee

Simas

Larson

(2022) An epidemic of uncertainty: rumors, conspiracy theories and vaccine hesitancy. Nature Medicine 28: 456–459.

32.

Phillips

(2015) This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

33.

Rampin

(2021) Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis. Journal of Open Source Software 6(68): 3522.

34.

Ribuffo

(2017) Donald Trump and the ‘paranoid style’ in American (intellectual) politics. The Robert Jervis International Security Studies Forum, 13 June. Available at: https://issforum.org/policy/1-5an-paranoid (accessed 16 February 2023).

35.

Rieder

(2015) YouTube data tools (Version 1.30) [Software]. Available at: https://tools.digitalmethods.net/netvizz/youtube/

36.

Rogers

(2013) Digital Methods. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

37.

Rosenblum

Muirhead

(2019) A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

38.

Rothut

Schulze

Hohner

, et al. (2024) Ambassadors of ideology: a conceptualization and computational investigation of far-right influencers, their networking structures, and communication practices. New Media & Society 26(12): 7120–7147.

39.

Sedgwick

(2003 [2002]) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

40.

Thompson

(2014) Russell Brand, Fox’s sean hannity trade barbs over Israel-Hamas conflict. CNN, 4 August. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2014/08/04/world/meast/russell-brand-sean-hannity-israel-hamas/index.html (accessed 17 February 2023).

41.

Tuters

Willaert

(2022) Deep state phobia: narrative convergence in coronavirus conspiracism on Instagram. Convergence 28: 1214–1238.

42.

Venturini

(2022) Online conspiracy theories, digital platforms and secondary orality: toward a sociology of online monsters. Theory, Culture & Society 39: 61–80.

43.

Wondreys

Mudde

(2022) Victims of the pandemic? European far-right parties and COVID-19. Nationalities Papers 50: 86–103.