Research on news sharing has focused on the societal relevance of news as the core value of traditional journalism or the informational characteristics of viral news on social media. In contrast, this study reinterprets news-sharing behaviors as interpersonal communication of news sharers presenting themselves to their personal networks beyond the distribution of societally important information. Through analyzing survey responses from 463 news sharers and the actual news they shared on social media, results suggest that news sharers consider their relationship with their audience and the personal and audience relevance of news to present their ideal selves and please their audience. By expanding the traditional emphasis on the societal relevance and informational characteristics of news, this study develops a theoretical framework to understand news sharing as interpersonal communication. It also provides future directions to conceptualize issue relevance at different levels and capture changed news-sharing behaviors in the era of networked individualism.
ApukeODOmarB (2021) User motivation in fake news sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An application of the uses and gratification theory. Online Information Review45(1): 220–239.
2.
BaumeisterRF (1982) A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin91(1): 3–26.
3.
BaumeisterRFHuttonDG (1987) Self-presentation theory: Self-construction and audience pleasing. In: MullenBGoethalsGR (eds) Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer. pp. 71–87.
4.
BazarovaNNChoiYH (2014) Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication64(4): 635–657.
5.
BeamMAChildJTHutchensMJ, et al. (2018) Context collapse and privacy management: Diversity in Facebook friends increases online news reading and sharing. new media & society20(7): 2296–2314.
6.
BergerJ (2014) Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology24(4): 586–607.
7.
BrightJ (2016) The social news gap: How news reading and news sharing diverge. Journal of Communication66(3): 343–365.
8.
CappellaJNKimHSAlbarracínD (2015) Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology18(3): 396–424.
9.
CareyJW (2007) A short history of journalism for journalists: A proposal and essay. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12: 3–16.
10.
ChadwickAVaccariCO’LoughlinB (2018) Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing. new media & society20(11): 4255–4274.
11.
ChenZBergerJ (2013) When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Journal of Consumer Research40(3): 580–593.
12.
ChewF (1994) The relationship of information needs to issue relevance and media use. Journalism Quarterly71(3): 676–688.
13.
ChoiBLeeI (2017) Trust in open versus closed social media: The relative influence of user- and marketer-generated content in social network services on customer trust. Telematics and Informatics34(5): 550–559.
14.
ChoiJ (2016) Why do people use news differently on SNSs? An investigation of the role of motivations, media repertoires, and technology cluster on citizens’ news-related activities. Computers in Human Behavior54: 249–256.
15.
Costera MeijerI (2020) Understanding the audience turn in journalism: From quality discourse to innovation discourse as anchoring practices 1995–2020. Journalism Studies21(16): 2326–2342.
16.
Costera MeijerIGroot KormelinkT (2015) Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digital Journalism3(5): 664–679.
17.
Dafonte GómezA (2018) Audience as medium: Motivations and emotions in news sharing. International Journal of Communication12: 2133–2152.
18.
EisingaRGrotenhuisMTPelzerB (2013) The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health58: 637–642.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
21.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78: 1360–1380.
22.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2017) What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies18(12): 1470–1488.
23.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenM (2008) Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6(1): 53–60.
24.
IhmJKimEM (2018) The hidden side of news diffusion: Understanding online news sharing as an interpersonal behavior. new media & society20(11): 4346–4365.
25.
JangJW (2023) Proximate or primary source? How multiple layers of news sources on social media predict news influence. Social Science Computer Review41(1): 201–216.
26.
KimCLeeJK (2016) Social media type matters: Investigating the relationship between motivation and online social network heterogeneity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media60(4): 676–693.
27.
KimEMIhmJ (2019) More than virality: Online sharing of controversial news with activated audience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(1): 118–140.
28.
KimEMIhmJ (2020) Online news sharing in the face of mixed audiences: Context collapse, homophily, and types of social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media64(5): 756–776.
29.
KimHS (2015) Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. Journal of Communication65(3): 512–534.
30.
KimYM (2009) Issue publics in the new information environment: Selectivity, domain specificity, and extremity. Communication Research36(2): 254–284.
31.
KümpelASKarnowskiVKeylingT (2015) News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media+ Society1(2): 1–14.
32.
LamotK (2022) What the metrics say. The softening of news on the Facebook pages of mainstream media outlets. Digital Journalism10(4): 517–536.
33.
LeeCSMaL (2012) News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior28(2): 331–339.
34.
LinRUtzS (2015) The emotional responses of browsing Facebook: Happiness, envy, and the role of tie strength. Computers in Human Behavior52: 29–38.
35.
LittE (2012) Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media56(3): 330–345.
36.
MaLSian LeeCGohDHL (2014) Understanding news sharing in social media: An explanation from the diffusion of innovations theory. Online Information Review38(5): 598–615.
37.
MarsdenPVCampbellKE (1984) Measuring tie strength. Social Forces63: 482–501.
38.
MarwickAEBoydD (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. new media & society13: 114–133.
NewmanN (2023) Overview and key findings of the 2023 Digital News Report. Report for Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 14 June. Available at: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023/dnr-executive-summary (accessed 8 November 2023).
41.
PiconeI (2011) Produsage as a form of self-publication. A qualitative study of casual news produsage. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia17: 99–120.
42.
PiconeIDe WolfRRobijtS (2016) Who shares what with whom and why? News sharing profiles amongst Flemish news users. Digital Journalism4(7): 921–932.
43.
RainieHWellmanB (2012) Networked: The New Social Operating System (Vol. 10). Cambridge: MIT Press.
44.
SchultzI (2007) The journalistic gut feeling: Journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice1(2): 190–207.
45.
SwartJGroot KormelinkTCostera MeijerI, et al. (2022) Advancing a radical audience turn in journalism. Fundamental dilemmas for journalism studies. Digital Journalism10(1): 8–22.
46.
TrillingDTolochkoPBurscherB (2017) From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(1): 38–60.
47.
WangLRzeszotarskiJM (2023) Understanding motivational factors in social media news sharing decisions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interact 7(CSCW1):1–30.
48.
WestlundO (2015) News consumption in an age of mobile media: Patterns, people, place, and participation. Mobile Media & Communication3(2): 151–159.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
