Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-6
Does high-quality news attract engagement on social media? Mediatization,media logic,and the contrasting values that shape news sharing,liking,and commenting on Facebook
Despite the concern over deteriorating news quality on social media, few studies have empirically examined how much high-quality news is rewarded on social media. Guided by the mediatization literature, we compared the extent to which normative values (i.e. factual reporting and public importance) in news stories as opposed to social media values (i.e. popularity) contribute to actual engagement such as sharing, liking, and commenting on Facebook. The normative values and social media values were drawn from survey participants’ evaluations of the news content, recruiting both consumers (n = 5816) and journalists (n = 742). Each news post’s engagement metrics were extracted from Facebook. Our analysis shows that consumers’ news judgments are overall consistent with those of journalists. More importantly, the study finds that a social media value dominates news engagement whereas normative values are eminently weak. We discuss the implications of the disproportionally powerful social media logic shaping news engagement in comparison to normative logics for news.
AllenJArecharAAPennycookG, et al. (2021) Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds. Science Advances7(36): eabf4393.
2.
Al-RawiA (2019) Viral news on social media. Digital Journalism7(1): 63–79.
3.
AltaySDe AraujoEMercierH (2022) “If this account is true, it is most enormously wonderful”: interestingness-if-true and the sharing of true and false news. Digital Journalism10(3): 373–394.
4.
BachmannPEiseneggerMIngenhoffD (2022) Defining and measuring news media quality: comparing the content perspective and the audience perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics27(1): 9–37.
5.
BensonRNeveuE (2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BoukesMVliegenthartR (2020) A general pattern in the construction of economic newsworthiness? Analyzing news factors in popular, quality, regional, and financial newspapers. Journalism21(2): 279–300.
7.
BourdieuP (1987) Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BourdieuP (1998 [1996]) On Television. London: Pluto Press.
9.
CarlsonM (2017) Journalistic Authority: Legitimating News in the Digital Era. New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
CarlsonMLewisSC (eds) (2015) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. New York: Routledge.
11.
ChoiS (2021) News gap in a digital news environment: calibrating editorial importance from user-rated news quality and identifying user characteristics that close the news gap. New Media & Society23(12): 3677–3701.
12.
ChungM (2017) Not just numbers: The role of social media metrics in online news evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior75: 949–957
13.
DoddsTde VreeseCHelbergerN, et al. (2023) Popularity-driven Metrics: audience Analytics and shifting opinion power to digital platforms. Journalism Studies24(3): 403–421.
14.
EdgerlySVragaEK (2020) Deciding what’s news: news-ness as an audience concept for the hybrid media environment. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(2): 416–434.
15.
EsserFStrömbäckJ (2014) Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. London: Springer.
Gil de ZúñigaHHinsleyA (2013) The press versus the public: what is “good journalism?”Journalism Studies14(6): 926–942.
18.
González-BailónS (2017) Decoding the Social World: Data Science and the Unintended Consequences of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2017) What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies18(12): 1470–1488.
20.
HjarvardS (2013) The Mediatization of Culture and Society. New York: Routledge.
21.
HurcombeE (2022) Social News: How Born-Digital Outlets Transformed Journalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2015) The emergence of network media logic in political communication: a theoretical approach. New Media & Society17(8): 1241–1257.
23.
KovachBRosenstielT (2021) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. 4th ed.New York: Crown.
24.
LandererN (2013) Rethinking the logics: a conceptual framework for the mediatization of politics. Communication Theory23(3): 239–258.
25.
Lehman-WilzigSNSeletzkyM (2010) Hard news, soft news, general news: The necessity and utility of an intermediate classification. Journalism11(1): 37–56.
26.
LewisSC (2012) The tension between professional control and open participation: journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
27.
LewisSCMolyneuxL (2018) A decade of research on social media and journalism: assumptions, blind spots, and a way forward. Media and Communication6(4): 11–23.
28.
LischkaJA (2021) Logics in social media news making: how social media editors marry the Facebook logic with journalistic standards. Journalism22(2): 430–447.
29.
LivingstoneS (2009) Foreword: coming to terms with ‘mediatization.’. In: LundbyK (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 9–13.
30.
LundbyK (2009) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang.
31.
MazzoleniG (2008) Mediatization of politics. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Epub ahead of print 5June. DOI: 10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecm062.
32.
MetzgerMJFlanaginAJMenaP, et al. (2021) From dark to light: the many shades of sharing misinformation online. Media and Communication9(1): 134–143.
33.
MolyneuxLZamithR (2022) Surveying journalists in the “new normal”: considerations and recommendations. Journalism23(1): 153–170.
34.
MukerjeeSYangTPengY (2023) Metrics in action: how social media metrics shape news production on Facebook. Journal of Communication73: 260–272.
35.
NapoliP (2019) Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press.
36.
PennycookGRandDG (2019) Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(7): 2521–2526.
RenZBDimantESchweitzerM (2023) Beyond belief: How social engagement motives influence the spread of conspiracy theories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 104.
39.
ResnickPAlfayezAImJGilbertE (2023) Searching for or reviewing evidence improves crowdworkers’ misinformation judgments and reduces partisan bias. Collective Intelligence2(2).
40.
RoiteroKMaddalenaEMizzaroSScholerF (2021) On the effect of relevance scales in crowdsourcing relevance assessments for Information Retrieval evaluation. Information Processing & Management58(6).
41.
SalganikMJWattsDJ (2009) Web-based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets. Topics in Cognitive Science1(3): 439–468.
42.
SaxtonGDGuoC (2020) Social media capital: conceptualizing the nature, acquisition, and expenditure of social media-based organizational resources. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems36: 100443.
43.
SchultzI (2007) The journalistic gut feeling: journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice1(2): 190–207.
44.
ShehataAStrömbäckJ (2021) Learning political news from social media: network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research48(1): 125–147.
45.
ShinJOgnyanovaK (2022) Social media metrics in the digital marketplace of attention: does journalistic capital matter for social media capital?Digital Journalism10(4): 579–598.
46.
ShinJThorsonK (2017) Partisan selective sharing: the biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication67(2): 233–255.
47.
ShoemakerPJCohenAA (2012) News Around the World: Content, Practitioners, and the Public. New York: Routledge.
48.
SingerJB (2003) Who are these guys? The online challenge to the notion of journalistic professionalism. Journalism4(2): 139–163.
49.
StrömbäckJ (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 228–246.
50.
TrillingDTolochkoPBurscherB (2017) From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: how to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly94(1): 38–60.
51.
UrbanJSchweigerW (2014) News quality from the recipients’ perspective: Investigating recipients’ ability to judge the normative quality of news. Journalism Studies15(6): 821–840.
52.
Van DijckJPoellT (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication1(1): 2–14.
53.
VosoughiSRoyDAralS (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science359(6380): 1146–1151.
54.
WaltersP (2022) Reclaiming control: how journalists embrace social media logics while defending journalistic values. Digital Journalism10(9): 1482–1501.
55.
WebsterJG (2010) User information regimes: how social media shape patterns of consumption. Northwestern University Law Review104: 593–612.
56.
WebsterJG (2014) The Marketplace of Attention: How Audiences Take Shape in a Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
ZhangWWangRLiuH (2023) Moral expressions, sources, and frames: Examining COVID-19 vaccination posts by Facebook public pages. Computers in Human Behavior138.
58.
ZhouALiuWKimHM, et al. (2022) Moral foundations, ideological divide, and public engagement with US government agencies’ COVID-19 vaccine communication on social media. Mass Communication and Society: 1–26.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
