Public opinion on new technologies, like artificial intelligence (AI), is influenced by media coverage. However, it remains unclear as to what extent seeking news and information about AI on legacy media as opposed to social media can shape trust in AI. A cross-national survey conducted across Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore and India investigated the impact of information seeking behaviour on trust in AI, as well as the moderating role of concern about misinformation online. Results indicate a positive relationship exists between seeking AI information on social media and trust across all countries. However, for traditional media, this association was only present in Singapore. When considering misinformation, a positive moderation effect was found for social media in Singapore and India, whereas a negative effect was observed for traditional media in Singapore. These findings have implications for the adoption of novel technologies and highlight the importance of understanding the role of media in shaping public trust.
AllcottHGentzkowMYuC (2019) Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics6(2): 2053168019848554.
2.
BalmasM (2014) When fake news becomes real: combined exposure to multiple news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy, alienation, and cynicism. Communication Research41(3): 430–454.
BrennenJHowardPNielsenRK (2018) An Industry-Led Debate: How UK Media Cover Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Reuters Institute.
7.
BroussardMDiakopoulosNGuzmanAL, et al (2019) Artificial intelligence and journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96(3): 673–695.
8.
BrundageMAvinSClarkJ, et al (2018) The malicious use of artificial intelligence: forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.07228 (accessed 17 October 2023).
9.
BunzMBraghieriM (2022) The AI doctor will see you now: assessing the framing of AI in news coverage. AI & Society37(1): 9–22.
10.
CaliceMNBaoLFreilingI, et al (2021) Polarized platforms? How partisanship shapes perceptions of ‘algorithmic news bias’. New Media & Society25(11): 2833–2854.
11.
CaveSCraigCDihalK, et al (2018) Portrayals and Perceptions of AI and Why They Matter. London: The Royal Society.
12.
ChenYNKWenCHR (2021) Impacts of attitudes toward government and corporations on public trust in artificial intelligence. Communication Studies72(1): 115–131.
13.
ChesneyBCitronD (2019) Deep fakes: a looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review107: 1753.
14.
ChuanC-HTsaiW-HSChoSY (2019) Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers. In: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society (eds ConitzerVHadfieldGVallorS), New York, 27–28January, pp. 339–344. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
15.
CuiDWuF (2021) The influence of media use on public perceptions of artificial intelligence in China: evidence from an online survey. Information Development37(1): 45–57.
16.
DonkAMetagJKohringM, et al (2012) Framing emerging technologies: risk perceptions of nanotechnology in the German press. Science Communication34(1): 5–29.
17.
DunwoodyS (2021) Science journalism: prospects in the digital age. In: BucchiMTrenchB (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge, pp. 14–32.
18.
FeldmanLMaibachEWRoser-RenoufC, et al (2012) Climate on cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. The International Journal of Press/Politics17(1): 3–31.
19.
FloridiLChiriattiM (2020) GPT-3: its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines30: 681–694.
20.
FountaineTMcCarthyBSalehT (2019) Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard Business Review97(4): 62–73.
21.
FüllerJHutterKWahlJ, et al (2022) How AI revolutionizes innovation management—perceptions and implementation preferences of AI-based innovators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change178: 121598.
22.
GauchatG (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review77(2): 167–187.
23.
GhalebEABDominicPDDSarlanA (2020) Impact of emerging technology innovations on healthcare transformation in developing countries. In: 2020 second international sustainability and resilience conference: technology and innovation in building designs, Sakheer, Bahrain, 11–12November, pp. 1–5. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
24.
GoodmanJRGoodmanBP (2006) Beneficial or biohazard? How the media frame biosolids. Public Understanding of Science15(3): 359–375.
25.
GuessANaglerJTuckerJ (2019) Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances5(1): eaau4586.
26.
GulatiSSousaSLamasD (2019) Design, development and evaluation of a human-computer trust scale. Behaviour & Information Technology38(10): 1004–1015.
27.
HameleersMBrosiusAde VreeseCH (2022) Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media. European Journal of Communication37(3): 237–268.
28.
HoSSScheufeleDACorleyEC (2010) Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research12: 2703–2715.
JohnsonJ (2019) Artificial intelligence & future warfare: implications for international security. Defense & Security Analysis35(2): 147–169.
31.
Jones-JangSMMortensenTLiuJ (2021) Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist65(2): 371–388.
32.
KapaniaSSiyOClapperG, et al (2022) ‘Because AI is 100% right and safe’: user attitudes and sources of AI authority in India. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (eds BarbosaSLampeCAppertC, et al.), New York, 9 April–5 May 2022, pp. 1–18. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
33.
KaranouhM (2023) Mapping ChatGPT in mainstream media: early quantitative insights through sentiment analysis and word frequency analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18340 (accessed 17 October 2023).
34.
LeeCSMaL (2012) News sharing in social media: the effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior28(2): 331–339.
35.
LuptonD (2013) Risk. London: Routledge.
36.
McknightDHCarterMThatcherJB, et al (2011) Trust in a specific technology: an investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems2(2): 12, 1–25.
NaderKTopracPScottS, et al (2022) Public understanding of artificial intelligence through entertainment media. AI & Society. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01427-w (accessed 17 October 2023).
NeyaziTANgYKAKuruO, et al (2022) Who gets exposed to political misinformation in a hybrid media environment? The case of the 2019 Indonesian election. Social Media + Society8(3): 20563051221122792.
41.
NguyenDHekmanE (2022) A ‘new arms race’? Framing China and the USA in AI news reporting: a comparative analysis of the Washington Post and South China morning post. Global Media and China7(1): 58–77.
42.
NielsenRGanterSA (2018) Dealing with digital intermediaries: a case study of the relations between publishers and platforms. New Media & Society20(4): 1600–1617.
43.
NisbetECCooperKEGarrettRK (2015) The partisan brain: how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science658(1): 36–66.
44.
PentzoldCBrantnerCFoelscheL (2019) Imagining Big Data: illustrations of ‘Big Data’ in US news articles, 2010–2016. New Media & Society21(1): 139–167.
45.
PickardV (2019) Democracy without Journalism? Confronting the Misinformation Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RussellSNorvigP (2021) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51.
ScharreP (2018) Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York: WW Norton & Company.
52.
ScheufeleDALewensteinBV (2005) The public and nanotechnology: how citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research7(6): 659–667.
53.
ShuKWangSLeeD, et al (2020) Mining disinformation and fake news: concepts, methods, and recent advancements. In: ShuKWangSLeeD, et al (eds) Disinformation, Misinformation, and Fake News in Social Media. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–19.
SunMMengXHuW (2023) Comparing the effects of traditional media and social media use on general trust in china during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Communication17: 1935–1955.
The International Institute of Communications (2020) Artificial Intelligence in the Asia-Pacific Region. London: IIC.
58.
VarakanthamPAnBLowB, et al (2017) Artificial intelligence research in Singapore: assisting the development of a smart nation. Ai Magazine38(3): 102–105.
59.
VergantiRVendraminelliLIansitiM (2020) Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management37(3): 212–227.
60.
VosoughiSRoyDAralS (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science359(6380): 1146–1151.
61.
WangX (2021) The motivations and uses of mainstream and social media during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a structural equation modeling approach. Computers in Human Behavior Reports4: 100098.
62.
WannerJHermL-VHeinrichK, et al (2022) The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: evidence from a user-based study. Electronic Markets32(4): 2079–2102.
63.
WaytzAHeafnerJEpleyN (2014) The mind in the machine: anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology52: 113–117.
64.
YangZJKahlorLLiH (2014) A United States-China comparison of risk information–seeking intentions. Communication Research41(7): 935–960.
65.
ZubiagaAProcterRMapleC (2018) A longitudinal analysis of the public perception of the opportunities and challenges of the Internet of things. PLoS ONE13(12): e0209472.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
