Unlike most social media, the new platform BeReal encourages users to present an authentic self. Since such self-presentations are assumed to have positive effects, this study examined whether adolescents’ authentic self-presentations on BeReal relate to a higher self-esteem and whether self-concept clarity plays a role in that relationship. The relationships between exposure to perceived authentic self-presentations of others, social comparison on BeReal, and self-esteem were also explored. Of the 367 adolescents who participated in our cross-sectional survey, a total of 148 (40.33%, Mage = 16.23, SDage = 1.46; 82.4% girls) had an account on BeReal. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we found that these adolescents’ authentic self-presentations were not significantly related to their self-concept clarity nor indirectly to their self-esteem. Self-esteem and self-concept clarity were, however, positively correlated. Regarding exposure to others’ content on BeReal, only upward and lateral social comparisons on these platforms were significantly related to a lower and higher self-esteem, respectively.
AlfasiY (2019) The grass is always greener on my friends’ profiles: the effect of Facebook social comparison on state self-esteem and depression. Personality and Individual Differences147: 111–117.
2.
BarryCTWongMY (2020) Fear of missing out (FoMO): a generational phenomenon or an individual difference?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships37(12): 2952–2966.
3.
BuunkAPGibbonsFX (2007) Social comparison: the end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes102: 3–21.
4.
CampbellJDTrapnellPDHeineSJ, et al. (1996) Self-concept clarity: measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology70(1): 141–156.
5.
CarrCTHayesRA (2019) Identity shift effects of self-presentation and confirmatory and disconfirmatory feedback on self-perceptions of brand identification. Media Psychology22: 418–444.
6.
CarrCTKimYValovJJ, et al. (2021) An explanation of identity shift theory: getting our shift together. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications33(4): 202–214.
7.
FestingerL (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations7: 117–140.
8.
FullwoodCJamesBMChen-WilsonCH (2016) Self-concept clarity and online self-presentation in adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking19: 716–720.
9.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
10.
GonzalesALHancockJT (2011) Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14(1–2): 79–83.
JacksonLAWangJL (2013) Cultural differences in social networking site use: a comparative study of China and the United States. Computers in Human Behavior29(3): 910–921.
13.
KleemansKDaalmansSCarbaatI, et al. (2018) Picture perfect: the direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychology21(1): 93–110.
14.
KoutamanisMVossenHValkenburgPM (2015) Adolescents’ comments in social media: why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk?Computers in Human Behavior53: 486–494.
15.
LockwoodP (2002) Could it happen to you? Predicting the impact of downward comparisons on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(3): 343–358.
16.
MeeusABeullensKEggermontS (2019) Like me (please?): connecting online self-presentation to pre- and early adolescents’ self-esteem. New Media & Society21(11–12): 2386–2403.
17.
MeierAJohnsonBK (2022) Social comparison and envy on social media: a critical review. Current Opinion in Psychology45: 101302.
18.
MeierASchäferS (2018) The positive side of social comparison on social network sites: how envy can drive inspiration on Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking21(7): 411–417.
MidgleyCThaiSLockwoodP, et al. (2021) When every day is a high school reunion: social media comparisons and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology121(2): 285–307.
NoonEJVrankenISchreursL (2023) Age matters? The moderating effect of age on the longitudinal relationship between upward and downward comparisons on Instagram and identity processes during emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood11: 288–302.
25.
PerreauK (n.d.) BeReal. Your friends for real. Available at: https://bere.al/en (accessed 28 October 2022).
26.
ReineckeLTrepteS (2014) Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: a two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior30: 95–102.
27.
RiordanBCWinterTFlettJAM, et al. (2022) Does the fear of missing out moderate the relationship between social networking use and affect? A daily diary study. Psychological Reports125(6): 3084–3099.
28.
RobinsRWHendinHMTrzesniewskiKH (2001) Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(2): 151–161. DOI: 10.1177/0146167201272002.
29.
SchreursLVandenboschL (2022) The development and validation of measurement instruments to address interactions with positive social media content. Media Psychology25(2): 262–289.
30.
SchwartzSJKlimstraTALuyckxK, et al. (2011) Daily dynamics of personal identity and self–concept clarity. European Journal of Personality25(5): 373–385.
31.
SherlockMWagstaffDL (2019) Exploring the relationship between frequency of Instagram use, exposure to idealized images, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Popular Media Culture8(4): 482–490.
32.
SmithRH (2000) Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In: SulsJWheelerL (eds) Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York: Springer, pp. 173–200.
33.
SubrahmanyamKŠmahelD (2011) Constructing identity online: identity exploration and self-presentation. In SubrahmanyamKŠmahelD (eds) Digital Youth. Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development. New York: Springer, pp. 59–80.
34.
TreemJWLeonardiPM (2013) Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association36: 143–189.
35.
TwomeyCO’ReillyG (2017) Associations of self-presentations on Facebook with mental health and personality variables: a systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking20(10): 587–595.
36.
Van DrielIIPouwelsJLBeyensI, et al. (2019) ‘Posten, scrollen, appen en snappen’: Jongeren (14-15 jaar) en social media in 2019. Available at: http://www.project-awesome.nl/rapport
VerduynPGugushvili MassarKTähtK, et al. (2020) Social comparison on social networking sites. Current Opinion in Psychology36: 32–37.
39.
VogelEARoseJP (2016) Self-reflection and interpersonal connection: making the most of self-presentation on social media. Translational Issues in Psychological Science2(3): 294–302.
40.
WestSGTaylorABWuW (2012) Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In: HoyleRH (ed.) Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 209–231.
41.
WongAEVallacherRRNowakA (2016) Intrinsic dynamics of state self-esteem: the role of self-concept clarity. Personality and Individual Differences100: 167–172.
42.
XiaoSMetaxaDParkJS, et al. (2020) Random, messy, funny, raw: Finstas as intimate reconfigurations of social media. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference, Honululu, HI, 25–30April.
43.
YangCCHoldenSMCarterMD (2017) Emerging adults’ social media self-presentation and identity development at college transition: mindfulness as a moderator. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology52: 212–221.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
