In this article, we present an analysis of distinctive WhatsApp uses with a focus on group dynamics, and how they are correlated with exposure to, belief in, accidental, and purposeful sharing of misinformation as well as misinformation corrections. Based on two nationally representative surveys in Brazil, and after controlling for a range of factors, we find that (a) being part of WhatsApp groups with no ties is significantly correlated with higher exposure to, belief in, and engagement with online misinformation, including sharing misinformation and being corrected for misinformation, as well as correcting others for misinformation on WhatsApp; (b) frequency of posting on WhatsApp is also significantly correlated with all our dependent variables, suggesting the role of hyperactive minorities in the spread of misinformation; and (c) discussing current affairs in strong tie groups and having frequent one-to-one discussions are significantly correlated with only a limited number of misinformation-related attitudes and beliefs.
AgurCFrischN (2019) Digital disobedience and the limits of Persuasion: social media activism in Hong Kong’s 2014 umbrella movement. Social Media + Society5(1): 2056305119827002.
2.
BadrinathanS (2021) Educative interventions to combat misinformation: evidence from a field experiment in India. American Political Science Review115: 1325–1341.
3.
BadrinathanSChauchardS (2023) “I don’t think that’s true, bro!” social corrections of misinformation in India. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Epub ahead of print 27 February. DOI: 10.1177/19401612231158770.
4.
BanajiSBhatRAgarwalA, et al. (2019) WhatsApp vigilantes: an exploration of citizen reception and circulation of WhatsApp misinformation linked to mob violence in India. Department of Media and Communications. London, UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.
5.
BarnidgeM (2020) Testing the inadvertency hypothesis: incidental news exposure and political disagreement across media platforms. Journalism21(8): 1099–1118.
6.
BaulchEMatamoros-FernándezAJohnsA (2020) Introduction: ten years of WhatsApp: the role of chat apps in the formation and mobilization of online publics. First Monday25(1): fm.v25i12.10412.
7.
BoczekKKoppersL (2020) What’s new about WhatsApp for news? A mixed-method study on news outlets’ strategies for using WhatsApp. Digital Journalism8(1): 126–144.
8.
BodeLVragaEK (2018) See something, say something: correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication33(9): 1131–1140.
9.
BoulianneS (2015) Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society18(5): 524–538.
10.
BoulianneS (2019) Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society22(1): 39–54.
11.
ChagasV (2022) WhatsApp and digital astroturfing: a social network analysis of Brazilian political discussion groups of Bolsonaro’s supporters. International Journal of Communication16: 2431–2455.
12.
ChauchardSGarimellaK (2022) What circulates on partisan WhatsApp in India? Insights from an unusual dataset. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media2: 1–42.
13.
CheesemanNFisherJHitchenJ, et al. (2020) Social media disruption: Nigeria’s WhatsApp politics. Journal of Democracy31(3): 145–159.
14.
EllisonNBBoydDM (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–172.
FletcherRNielsenRK (2018) Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society20(7): 2450–2468.
17.
Gil de ZúñigaHArdèvol-AbreuACasero-RipollésA (2021) WhatsApp political discussion, conventional participation and activism: exploring direct, indirect and generational effects. Information, Communication & Society24(2): 201–218.
18.
Gil de ZúñigaHMolyneuxLZhengP (2014) Social media, political expression, and political participation: panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication64(4): 612–634.
19.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
20.
GuessAMungerKNaglerJ, et al. (2019) How accurate are survey responses on social media and politics?Political Communication36(2): 241–258.
21.
HillSJRobertsME (2023) Acquiescence bias inflates estimates of conspiratorial beliefs and political misperceptions. Political Analysis. Epub ahead of print 9 January. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2022.28.
KalogeropoulosA (2021) Who shares news on mobile messaging applications, why and in what ways? A cross-national analysis. Mobile Media & Communication9(2): 336–352.
26.
KarapanosETeixeiraPGouveiaR (2016) Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: a case on Facebook and WhatsApp. Computers in Human Behavior55: 888–897.
27.
Kligler-VilenchikN (2021) Friendship and politics don’t mix? The role of sociability for online political talk. Information, Communication & Society24(1): 118–133.
28.
Kligler-VilenchikNTenenboimO (2020) Sustained journalist–Audience reciprocity in a meso news-space: the case of a journalistic WhatsApp group. New Media & Society22(2): 264–282.
29.
LuYHeatherlyKALeeJK (2016) Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: the effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior59: 74–81.
30.
MarwickAEBoydD (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society13(1): 114–133.
31.
MasipPSuauJRuiz-CaballeroC, et al. (2021) News engagement on closed platforms. Human factors and technological affordances influencing exposure to news on WhatsApp. Digital Journalism9(8): 1062–1084.
32.
MilanSBarbosaS (2020) Enter the WhatsApper: reinventing digital activism at the time of chat apps. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 6 January. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v25i12.10414.
33.
MillerPRBobkowskiPSMaliniakD, et al. (2015) Talking politics on Facebook: network centrality and political discussion practices in social media. Political Research Quarterly68(2): 377–391.
Moore-GilbertKAbdul-NabiZ (2021) Authoritarian downgrading, (self)censorship and new media activism after the Arab Spring. New Media & Society23(5): 875–893.
36.
MoreyACEvelandWPHutchensMJ (2012) The “who” matters: types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication29(1): 86–103.
37.
NewmanNFletcherRKalogeropoulosA, et al. (2019) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
NorrisP (2002) The bridging and bonding role of online communities. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics7(3): 3–13.
40.
PangNWooYT (2020) What about WhatsApp? A systematic review of WhatsApp and its role in civic and political engagement. First Monday25(12): 10417.
41.
PriorM (2009) The immensely inflated news audience: assessing Bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly73(1): 130–143.
42.
QuandtT (2018) Dark participation. Media and Communication6(4): 36–48.
43.
RecueroRSoaresFVinhasO (2021) Discursive strategies for disinformation on WhatsApp and Twitter during the 2018 Brazilian presidential election. First Monday. Epub ahead of print 4 January. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v26i1.10551.
44.
ReisJCSMeloPGarimellaK, et al. (2020) A dataset of fact-checked images shared on WhatsApp during the Brazilian and Indian elections. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media14: 903–908.
45.
ResendeGMeloPSousaH, et al. (2019) (Mis)information dissemination in WhatsApp: gathering, analyzing and countermeasures. In: WWW ’19: the world wide web conference, San Francisco, CA, 13–17May, pp. 818–828. New York: ACM Press.
46.
ResendeGMessiasJSilvaM, et al. (2018) A system for monitoring public political groups in WhatsApp. In: WebMedia’18: Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian symposium on multimedia and the web, Salvador, Brazil, 16–19October, pp. 387–390. New York: ACM.
47.
RossiniPStromer-GalleyJBaptistaEA, et al. (2021) Dysfunctional information sharing on WhatsApp and Facebook: the role of political talk, cross-cutting exposure and social corrections. New Media & Society23(8): 2430–2451.
48.
RossiniP (2023) Farewell to big data? Studying misinformation in mobile messaging applications. Political Communication40(3): 361–366.
49.
SmallpageSMEndersAMDrochonH, et al. (2023) The impact of social desirability bias on conspiracy belief measurement across cultures. Political Science Research and Methods11: 555–569.
50.
SoaresFBRecueroRVolcanT, et al. (2021) Bolsonaro’s firehose: how Covid-19 disinformation on WhatsApp was used to fight a government political crisis in Brazil. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review2(1): 1–13.
51.
SwartJPetersCBroersmaM (2018) Shedding light on the dark social: the connective role of news and journalism in social media communities. New Media & Society20(11): 4329–4345.
52.
SwartJPetersCBroersmaM (2019) Sharing and discussing news in private social media groups. Digital Journalism7(2): 187–205.
53.
TheocharisYCardenalAJinS, et al. (2021) Does the platform matter? Social media and COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 9 October. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211045666.
54.
VaccariCChadwickA (2020) Deepfakes and disinformation: exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society6(1): 2056305120903408.
55.
VaccariCChadwickAKaiserJ (2023) The campaign disinformation divide: believing and sharing news in the 2019 UK general election. Political Communication40(1): 4–23.
56.
ValenzuelaSCorreaTZúñigaHG, et al. (2018) Ties, likes, and tweets: using strong and weak ties to explain differences in protest participation across Facebook and Twitter use. Political Communication35(1): 117–134.
57.
ValenzuelaSHalpernDKatzJE, et al. (2019) The paradox of participation versus misinformation: social media, political engagement, and the spread of misinformation. Digital Journalism7(6): 802–823.
58.
ValenzuelaSKimYand Gil de Zúñiga H (2012) Social networks that matter: exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research24(2): 163–184.
59.
ValenzuelaSMuñizCSantosM (2022) Social media and belief in misinformation in Mexico: a case of maximal panic, minimal effects?The International Journal of Press/Politics. Epub ahead of print 24 March. DOI: 10.1177/19401612221088988.
60.
ValerianiAVaccariC (2018) Political talk on mobile instant messaging services: a comparative analysis of Germany, Italy, and the UK. Information, Communication & Society21(11): 1715–1731.
61.
VelasquezAQuenetteARojasH (2021) WhatsApp political expression and political participation: the role of ethnic minorities’ group solidarity and political talk ethnic heterogeneity. International Journal of Communication15: 2743–2764.
62.
VermeerSAMKruikemeierSTrillingD, et al. (2021) WhatsApp with politics?!: examining the effects of interpersonal political discussion in instant messaging apps. The International Journal of Press/Politics26: 410–437.
63.
VitakJEllisonNB (2013) ‘There’s a network out there you might as well tap’: exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society15(2): 243–259.
64.
WardleCDerakhshanH (2017) Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
65.
WaterlooSFBaumgartnerSEPeterJ, et al. (2018) Norms of online expressions of emotion: comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society20(5): 1813–1831.
